    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c38+43?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Noise concerns, bird habitat hold up alternative-energy plans</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23558</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Bell Acres Council will soon decide whether one more footprint will disturb the great blue herons and other residents. 

An alternative-energy demonstration site - involving a single 66-foot-high wind turbine, a 15-foot-high turbine, some solar panels and a trailer - has been proposed by a collaboration of Metal Foundations (Ambridge), Vox Energy (Allison Park) and Jet Industries (Ellwood City) for a site near the intersection of Big Sewickley Creek Road, also designated as the Red Belt, and Turkeyfoot Road. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Bell Acres Council will soon decide whether one more footprint will disturb the great blue herons and other residents. 

An alternative-energy demonstration site - involving a single 66-foot-high wind turbine, a 15-foot-high turbine, some solar panels and a trailer - has been proposed by a collaboration of Metal Foundations (Ambridge), Vox Energy (Allison Park) and Jet Industries (Ellwood City) for a site near the intersection of Big Sewickley Creek Road, also designated as the Red Belt, and Turkeyfoot Road. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23558</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind power has its own environmental problems</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21921</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:12:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind power generation is expected to be a clean and environmentally friendly natural energy source, but a new kind of environmental problem has surfaced as infrasonic waves caused by windmills are suspected of causing health problems for some people. ...Wind power generation also poses a danger to birds, which are often struck and killed by the spinning vanes of the windmills. The Japanese Environment Ministry confirmed 13 such bird strikes in which white-tailed eagles, a rare species, were killed since fiscal 2003. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind power generation is expected to be a clean and environmentally friendly natural energy source, but a new kind of environmental problem has surfaced as infrasonic waves caused by windmills are suspected of causing health problems for some people. ...Wind power generation also poses a danger to birds, which are often struck and killed by the spinning vanes of the windmills. The Japanese Environment Ministry confirmed 13 such bird strikes in which white-tailed eagles, a rare species, were killed since fiscal 2003.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21921</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm 'kills Taiwanese goats'</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21305</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 17:45:56 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Abnormal noises could affect growth and feeding of the goats, officials say 
A large number of goats in Taiwan may have died of exhaustion because of noise from a wind farm.
A farmer on an outlying island told the BBC he had lost more than 400 animals after eight giant wind turbines were installed close to his grazing land. ...Mr Kuo said the power company had offered to help him move but that there would be no compensation for the loss of his goats. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Abnormal noises could affect growth and feeding of the goats, officials say 
A large number of goats in Taiwan may have died of exhaustion because of noise from a wind farm.
A farmer on an outlying island told the BBC he had lost more than 400 animals after eight giant wind turbines were installed close to his grazing land. ...Mr Kuo said the power company had offered to help him move but that there would be no compensation for the loss of his goats. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21305</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine noise suspected of killing 400 goats</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21303</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Late-night noise from spinning wind turbines on an outlying island of Taiwan may have killed 400 goats over the past three years by depriving them of sleep, an agricultural inspection official said on Thursday. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Late-night noise from spinning wind turbines on an outlying island of Taiwan may have killed 400 goats over the past three years by depriving them of sleep, an agricultural inspection official said on Thursday.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21303</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Part I: Borough Council VP Bill Latchford sits down for a Q &amp; A about Gamesa's proposed wind farm on Ice Mountain</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13164</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ What is your main concern right now with a wind farm on Ice Mountain?

My main concern would be the noise levels of the wind mills, based on the noise problem at the Allegheny Ridge project right now. Gamesa doesn't say there's not a problem, they admit there is a problem and they're working on it, but until they get that problem fixed, I'm pretty much a &quot;no&quot; until I hear that. If Gamesa fixes that problem, and the opponents up there that told me they don't like the noise are happy, and the noise is not there anymore, I can't think of anything standing in my way of a wind farm, in just my vote, coming here.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>What is your main concern right now with a wind farm on Ice Mountain?

My main concern would be the noise levels of the wind mills, based on the noise problem at the Allegheny Ridge project right now. Gamesa doesn't say there's not a problem, they admit there is a problem and they're working on it, but until they get that problem fixed, I'm pretty much a &quot;no&quot; until I hear that. If Gamesa fixes that problem, and the opponents up there that told me they don't like the noise are happy, and the noise is not there anymore, I can't think of anything standing in my way of a wind farm, in just my vote, coming here.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13164</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind power to increase across state in 2008</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12774</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ There has been very few wind projects built in the state since 2000, though more are planned in the next 12 to 24 months, said Ed Blume, spokesperson for the nonprofit environmental group RENEW Wisconsin. ...According to Blume, the biggest challenges to increasing wind power in the state are more at the local level. The largest complaints in regard to wind turbines are noise level, moving shadows created by the blades and harm to birds.

The state typically requires turbines to be 1,000 feet from homes, with noise levels varying on the speed of the wind and how close a home is to the turbine. Bjurlin said the turbines at the Springfield site are loudest in 18 mile per hour winds, with winds over that amount being louder than the sound of the blades.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>There has been very few wind projects built in the state since 2000, though more are planned in the next 12 to 24 months, said Ed Blume, spokesperson for the nonprofit environmental group RENEW Wisconsin. ...According to Blume, the biggest challenges to increasing wind power in the state are more at the local level. The largest complaints in regard to wind turbines are noise level, moving shadows created by the blades and harm to birds.

The state typically requires turbines to be 1,000 feet from homes, with noise levels varying on the speed of the wind and how close a home is to the turbine. Bjurlin said the turbines at the Springfield site are loudest in 18 mile per hour winds, with winds over that amount being louder than the sound of the blades.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12774</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>GAINES: Wind opposition continues</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12359</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The majority of the Gaines Wind Advisory Committee said at Wednesday's meeting that they don't believe wind energy is in the best interest of the Town of Gaines. ...Concerned Gaines residents filled the town hall to capacity Wednesday evening as they listened to prepared statements from each of the committee members listing worries about noise, costs, property values, vibration effects and the impact on wildlife. 

Of the eight-member board, two said they would be in favor of the 400-foot wind turbines. The remaining, including alternate Ted Swierznski sitting in for Royce Klatt, voiced opposition to the towers, while acknowledging their research is incomplete. &quot;Federal and state subsidies are the only reason wind energy is taking a foothold in this country,&quot; said advisory member Marilynn Miller.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The majority of the Gaines Wind Advisory Committee said at Wednesday's meeting that they don't believe wind energy is in the best interest of the Town of Gaines. ...Concerned Gaines residents filled the town hall to capacity Wednesday evening as they listened to prepared statements from each of the committee members listing worries about noise, costs, property values, vibration effects and the impact on wildlife. 

Of the eight-member board, two said they would be in favor of the 400-foot wind turbines. The remaining, including alternate Ted Swierznski sitting in for Royce Klatt, voiced opposition to the towers, while acknowledging their research is incomplete. &quot;Federal and state subsidies are the only reason wind energy is taking a foothold in this country,&quot; said advisory member Marilynn Miller.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12359</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Power- Will Nimbys Win?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6725</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:20:13 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Nimby-ism (Notin My Back) is almost understandable when talking about a gas pipeline or an ugly McMansion. But when it comes to environmentally friendly, quiet and- some say- beautiful windmills, an astonishing number of people are saying &quot;no&quot;. Melanie Wold asks, &quot;Why? Is it all the dead seagulls?&quot;<br>
<br>
<strong>Editor's Note:</strong> This article appeared in the October 2006 issue of Shattered Magazine. The pdf version is available via the link below. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Nimby-ism (Notin My Back) is almost understandable when talking about a gas pipeline or an ugly McMansion. But when it comes to environmentally friendly, quiet and- some say- beautiful windmills, an astonishing number of people are saying &quot;no&quot;. Melanie Wold asks, &quot;Why? Is it all the dead seagulls?&quot;

Editor's Note: This article appeared in the October 2006 issue of Shattered Magazine. The pdf version is available via the link below.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6725</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Plans for five wind farms are thrown out</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/643</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Wind Farms Awareness Group before the meeting.
 
The encroachment of wind farms into Perthshire was again halted by councillors as another five proposed schemes were knocked back.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Wind Farms Awareness Group before the meeting.
 
The encroachment of wind farms into Perthshire was again halted by councillors as another five proposed schemes were knocked back.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/643</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Blaengwen windfarm refused</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/630</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:24:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A DRAMATIC stop has been put on an application to erect 10 of the largest wind turbines in Wales on a site near Pencader.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A DRAMATIC stop has been put on an application to erect 10 of the largest wind turbines in Wales on a site near Pencader.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/630</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine syndrome: Noise pollution could be blowing in the wind but more evidence is needed</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22948</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This report appeared in this month's edition of Advance for Audiologists, a trade magazine for professional audiologists. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This report appeared in this month's edition of Advance for Audiologists, a trade magazine for professional audiologists. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22948</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Staff recommends WV PSC deny siting permit for Liberty Gap Wind Force</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9728</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 22:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Excerpts below are from the May 16, 2007 Proposed Order of WV PSC denying Liberty Gap's application for CPCN (siting permit) for 50 wind turbine project atop Jack Mtn in Pendleton County: ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Excerpts below are from the May 16, 2007 Proposed Order of WV PSC denying Liberty Gap's application for CPCN (siting permit) for 50 wind turbine project atop Jack Mtn in Pendleton County:</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9728</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Throwing Caution to the Wind: the growing threat of Industrial Wind Energy Development in Pennsylvania to Wildlife, Habitat and Public Lands</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5493</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 12:54:37 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <br>
This is a comprehensive, well documented and thoughtful presentation on a wide range of industrial wind issues by Dan Boone, Consulting Conservation Biologist, 

at the public meeting held by

Save Our Allegheny Ridges in Bedford, PA on September 18, 2006 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>
This is a comprehensive, well documented and thoughtful presentation on a wide range of industrial wind issues by Dan Boone, Consulting Conservation Biologist, 

at the public meeting held by

Save Our Allegheny Ridges in Bedford, PA on September 18, 2006</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5493</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Representative Mollohan's Letter to the Public Service Commission of West Virginia</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4325</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ WV's Congressman Mollohan submitted a letter on July 26, 2006 to the WV Public Service Commission (PSC) concerning the Beech Ridge wind energy project proposed for Greenbrier County, WV by Chicago-based Invenergy, Inc.  This wind energy developer successfully pushed through a windplant in Wisconsin nearby the Horicon Marsh - a globally-significant wildlife area and National Wildlife Refuge - despite the widespread outcry by national and local wildlife groups who opposed such close siting.<br />
<br />
 
Mollohan's letter points out that Invenergy disregarded recommendations by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for multi-year pre-construction studies regarding the project's potential impacts on migratory birds and bats.  He also observed that although WV's one operating wind project in Tucker County has been the site of record-setting bat mortality due to collision with turbine blades, the project operator (FPL Energy) has cut off access to the site for scientific study or investigation, even by the National Research Council/National Academies committee charged by the U.S. Congress to study the environmental impacts of wind projects in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands (see footnote #2 in his letter).
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>WV's Congressman Mollohan submitted a letter on July 26, 2006 to the WV Public Service Commission (PSC) concerning the Beech Ridge wind energy project proposed for Greenbrier County, WV by Chicago-based Invenergy, Inc.  This wind energy developer successfully pushed through a windplant in Wisconsin nearby the Horicon Marsh - a globally-significant wildlife area and National Wildlife Refuge - despite the widespread outcry by national and local wildlife groups who opposed such close siting.&lt;
&gt;
&lt;
&gt;
 
Mollohan's letter points out that Invenergy disregarded recommendations by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for multi-year pre-construction studies regarding the project's potential impacts on migratory birds and bats.  He also observed that although WV's one operating wind project in Tucker County has been the site of record-setting bat mortality due to collision with turbine blades, the project operator (FPL Energy) has cut off access to the site for scientific study or investigation, even by the National Research Council/National Academies committee charged by the U.S. Congress to study the environmental impacts of wind projects in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands (see footnote #2 in his letter).
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4325</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>The Wayward Wind</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/3575</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Because time seems to be running out on fossil fuels and the lure of 
non-polluting windpower is so seductive, some people are now promoting windpower 
initiatives at any cost, without investigating potential negative consequences-- and with 
no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental history......Throughout my experience, I could not substantiate a single claim developers made for 
industrial wind energy, including the one justifying its existence: that massive wind 
installations would meaningfully reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. When you 
understand this, you realize the wind business is not really that complex. But there are a 
lot of complicated issues swirling around it that obscure and distract from this main point, 
issues such as global warming, property values, the nature of wind leases, local revenues 
and taxes, wildlife, natural views, and a host of others. So how does one know the truth of 
it all? How does one go about separating the reality from spin? 


 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Because time seems to be running out on fossil fuels and the lure of 
non-polluting windpower is so seductive, some people are now promoting windpower 
initiatives at any cost, without investigating potential negative consequences-- and with 
no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental history......Throughout my experience, I could not substantiate a single claim developers made for 
industrial wind energy, including the one justifying its existence: that massive wind 
installations would meaningfully reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. When you 
understand this, you realize the wind business is not really that complex. But there are a 
lot of complicated issues swirling around it that obscure and distract from this main point, 
issues such as global warming, property values, the nature of wind leases, local revenues 
and taxes, wildlife, natural views, and a host of others. So how does one know the truth of 
it all? How does one go about separating the reality from spin? 


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/3575</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Documentation Related to the Proposed Bald Hills Wind Farm, Victoria, Australia</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/1948</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:06:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Compliments of Andrew Chapman, the attached pdf files contain extensive documentation particularly with respect to the impact of wind turbines on wildlife as part of an ongoing effort to prevent the construction of the Bald Hills Wind Farm, South Gippsland, Victoria. 
While it has been approved by the Victorian State Government the presence in the Bald Hills area of migratory species of national and international significance that are protected by treaties with Japan and China in the Bald Hills has placed the final decision in the hands of the Federal Government.  This decision is pending. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Compliments of Andrew Chapman, the attached pdf files contain extensive documentation particularly with respect to the impact of wind turbines on wildlife as part of an ongoing effort to prevent the construction of the Bald Hills Wind Farm, South Gippsland, Victoria. 
While it has been approved by the Victorian State Government the presence in the Bald Hills area of migratory species of national and international significance that are protected by treaties with Japan and China in the Bald Hills has placed the final decision in the hands of the Federal Government.  This decision is pending.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/1948</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Power Facility Siting Case Studies: Community Response</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/106</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ BBC Research &amp; Consulting's 2005 report for the National Wind Coordinating Committee that studies 9 wind plant sitings in an effort to identify circumstances that distinguish welcomed projects from projects that were not accepted by communities. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>BBC Research &amp; Consulting's 2005 report for the National Wind Coordinating Committee that studies 9 wind plant sitings in an effort to identify circumstances that distinguish welcomed projects from projects that were not accepted by communities.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/106</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Personal impressions from the Maple Ridge wind farm bus tour</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12295</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:35:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Each time I've visited the Maple Ridge Wind Farm I've become more depressed about wind energy development. I could never seem to reconcile the professed benefits of these projects with their obvious adverse impacts. But today I learned the most valuable reason to oppose this industry. 

The Maple Ridge project site is 12 miles long by 3 miles wide. Up and down the roads we went today and I viewed this industrial power facility once again. In viewing the entire expanse of impacted area I couldn't help but notice that there was no sense of a living community - no routine life. No people walking their dogs, no hikers, no bicyclers, no children laughing and playing (school was out), no clothes hanging out to dry, no school buses, no dogs barking, and very few birds, no one on their four wheelers on their own lands enjoying the open air. There were no roadside stands selling pumpkins. The serenity of rural community life that we all know and love here in northern Jefferson County was strangely absent. 

In its stead, we saw massive machines everywhere we looked, on both sides of the road. This was Bill Moore's world and PPM literally owned it all. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Each time I've visited the Maple Ridge Wind Farm I've become more depressed about wind energy development. I could never seem to reconcile the professed benefits of these projects with their obvious adverse impacts. But today I learned the most valuable reason to oppose this industry. 

The Maple Ridge project site is 12 miles long by 3 miles wide. Up and down the roads we went today and I viewed this industrial power facility once again. In viewing the entire expanse of impacted area I couldn't help but notice that there was no sense of a living community - no routine life. No people walking their dogs, no hikers, no bicyclers, no children laughing and playing (school was out), no clothes hanging out to dry, no school buses, no dogs barking, and very few birds, no one on their four wheelers on their own lands enjoying the open air. There were no roadside stands selling pumpkins. The serenity of rural community life that we all know and love here in northern Jefferson County was strangely absent. 

In its stead, we saw massive machines everywhere we looked, on both sides of the road. This was Bill Moore's world and PPM literally owned it all. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12295</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbines have their tradeoffs</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6722</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:51:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Be wary of individuals preaching the benefits while avoiding mention of ill effects from wind turbines. They probably are set to make a bundle off the things. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Be wary of individuals preaching the benefits while avoiding mention of ill effects from wind turbines. They probably are set to make a bundle off the things. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6722</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Searsburg windmills aren't silent, intelligent</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/3413</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Mr. Nye's paean to the electric companies aside, these huge industrial generators are not silent, they are not intelligent, and they are most certainly not friends to the environment. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Mr. Nye's paean to the electric companies aside, these huge industrial generators are not silent, they are not intelligent, and they are most certainly not friends to the environment. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/3413</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
