    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c38+122?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Garrett must say yes to windfarm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22348</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett must approve the Stockyard Hill Wind Farm, under national laws, before it can go ahead.

The project has gone to the Federal Government because it has been found likely to have significant environmental impact.

It now must be assessed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett must approve the Stockyard Hill Wind Farm, under national laws, before it can go ahead.

The project has gone to the Federal Government because it has been found likely to have significant environmental impact.

It now must be assessed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22348</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Highland New Wind's loss of green credentials</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22096</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A month ago HNWD development made national news when its public relations firm announced that Virginia's first utility scale wind project was ready to start construction. As indicated here, that was a blatant misrepresentation. HNWD does not have a building permit, does not have an Erosion and Sediment Control permit, does not have approval from the FAA, has not satisfied the permit conditions imposed by the State Corporation Commission (SCC), and has not obtained an Endangered Species Act permit.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A month ago HNWD development made national news when its public relations firm announced that Virginia's first utility scale wind project was ready to start construction. As indicated here, that was a blatant misrepresentation. HNWD does not have a building permit, does not have an Erosion and Sediment Control permit, does not have approval from the FAA, has not satisfied the permit conditions imposed by the State Corporation Commission (SCC), and has not obtained an Endangered Species Act permit. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22096</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm approved despite court challenge</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21905</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The New South Wales Government has given planning approval for a wind farm at Gullen Range, near Goulburn in the state's south, despite an ongoing case in the Land and Environment Court.

The Government has given the $250 million plan the green light after putting in place measures to protect the powerful owl and the wedgetail eagle.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The New South Wales Government has given planning approval for a wind farm at Gullen Range, near Goulburn in the state's south, despite an ongoing case in the Land and Environment Court.

The Government has given the $250 million plan the green light after putting in place measures to protect the powerful owl and the wedgetail eagle.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21905</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>North Harmony Debates Projects; Town Asks For Public's Opinion</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20946</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Town officials would like to regulate wind energy and adult entertainment, asking for the public's opinions regarding both issues. ...Supervisor Sally Carlson said about seven people from the Jamestown Audubon Society raised concerns during Tuesday's wind energy hearing about the possibility of commercial windmills within two miles of Chautauqua Lake affecting migratory birds.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Town officials would like to regulate wind energy and adult entertainment, asking for the public's opinions regarding both issues. ...Supervisor Sally Carlson said about seven people from the Jamestown Audubon Society raised concerns during Tuesday's wind energy hearing about the possibility of commercial windmills within two miles of Chautauqua Lake affecting migratory birds.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20946</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm deliberations to wrap up on April 29 </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20902</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Dr. Kent also said he believed it would be important for the state Fish and Game Department and scientists from the Appalachian Mountain Club to verify - ground-truth - the condition of the 1,700 acres that would be set aside as a mitigation package to compensate for habitat loss on Mt. Kelsey and Dixville Peak. 

&quot;We need to know the details, what's really on the ground, to understand if it's &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; - that is, the same spruce-fir habitat that will be lost on those ridgelines,&quot; Dr. Kent said. &quot;No evidence has been presented.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Dr. Kent also said he believed it would be important for the state Fish and Game Department and scientists from the Appalachian Mountain Club to verify - ground-truth - the condition of the 1,700 acres that would be set aside as a mitigation package to compensate for habitat loss on Mt. Kelsey and Dixville Peak. 

&quot;We need to know the details, what's really on the ground, to understand if it's &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; - that is, the same spruce-fir habitat that will be lost on those ridgelines,&quot; Dr. Kent said. &quot;No evidence has been presented.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20902</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm plan clears ‘major hurdle'; DEP OKs $130M Rollins Mountain wind farm </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20853</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:04:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Maine Department of Environmental Protection issued First Wind of Massachusetts a permit Tuesday to build a 40-turbine industrial wind site for $130 million on Rollins Mountain in Burlington, Lee, Lincoln and Winn. 

&quot;The Department finds that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed project will provide significant tangible benefits to the host community and surrounding area,&quot;.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Maine Department of Environmental Protection issued First Wind of Massachusetts a permit Tuesday to build a 40-turbine industrial wind site for $130 million on Rollins Mountain in Burlington, Lee, Lincoln and Winn. 

&quot;The Department finds that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed project will provide significant tangible benefits to the host community and surrounding area,&quot;.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20853</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>'Wind farm' project progressing quietly</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20812</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:54:57 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A &quot;wind farm&quot; that would take advantage of the gusts that have been blowing through the Central Coast at 30 to 50 mph is moving right along despite a lawsuit filed against the county's approval of the project.

Construction won't begin for at least a year, but in the meantime officials of the developer say they are working to meet all the requirements imposed by the county with the intention of protecting the environment surrounding the &quot;clean energy&quot; project.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A &quot;wind farm&quot; that would take advantage of the gusts that have been blowing through the Central Coast at 30 to 50 mph is moving right along despite a lawsuit filed against the county's approval of the project.

Construction won't begin for at least a year, but in the meantime officials of the developer say they are working to meet all the requirements imposed by the county with the intention of protecting the environment surrounding the &quot;clean energy&quot; project.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20812</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Supes okay Lompoc wind farm; Dismiss objections by neighbors, bird advocates</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19951</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Lompoc Wind Farm was on the supervisors' plate this Tuesday after neighbors of the project site, George and Cheryl Bedford, and the California Department of Fish and Game filed appeals of its unanimous approval at the County Planning Commission last fall. The latter objected to the undeniable impact that the wind turbines, with their 135-foot blades approaching 200 miles per hour at the tip, would have on bird and bat populations. The former was more concerned about the desecration of viewsheds and noise pollution. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Lompoc Wind Farm was on the supervisors' plate this Tuesday after neighbors of the project site, George and Cheryl Bedford, and the California Department of Fish and Game filed appeals of its unanimous approval at the County Planning Commission last fall. The latter objected to the undeniable impact that the wind turbines, with their 135-foot blades approaching 200 miles per hour at the tip, would have on bird and bat populations. The former was more concerned about the desecration of viewsheds and noise pollution.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19951</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind utility permit conditions still a concern</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19721</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:56:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Despite Highland New Wind Development's request for streamlined treatment from state agencies, the Department of Historic Resources has determined the company must still submit a detailed site plan and visual impact study, particularly because its proposed 39-megawatt wind energy utility would be near a protected Civil War battlefield. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Despite Highland New Wind Development's request for streamlined treatment from state agencies, the Department of Historic Resources has determined the company must still submit a detailed site plan and visual impact study, particularly because its proposed 39-megawatt wind energy utility would be near a protected Civil War battlefield. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19721</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Sevenmile wind project dies; First Wind letter withdraws application (includes link to letter)</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19688</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A controversial proposal to site wind turbines on Sevenmile Hill near The Dalles has been cancelled.

A letter from Massachusetts-based applicant First Wind dated Jan. 20 formally withdrew the company's application. ...&quot;We're dancing in the street,&quot; said attorney Mark Womble, a Sevenmile resident who was part of fierce opposition to the plan. &quot;We're excited. We're very happy.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A controversial proposal to site wind turbines on Sevenmile Hill near The Dalles has been cancelled.

A letter from Massachusetts-based applicant First Wind dated Jan. 20 formally withdrew the company's application. ...&quot;We're dancing in the street,&quot; said attorney Mark Womble, a Sevenmile resident who was part of fierce opposition to the plan. &quot;We're excited. We're very happy.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19688</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>RSPB to build wind farms on its bird reserves </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19098</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is drawing up plans that will see wind turbines constructed on its estates as part of a new green energy drive. 

The move, which will see the RSPB generating power for its own buildings and selling any surplus to the National Grid, is likely to anger some RSPB members who believe wind farms pose a threat to rare birds of prey. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is drawing up plans that will see wind turbines constructed on its estates as part of a new green energy drive. 

The move, which will see the RSPB generating power for its own buildings and selling any surplus to the National Grid, is likely to anger some RSPB members who believe wind farms pose a threat to rare birds of prey. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19098</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine details made public</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18836</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:21:01 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Details of a wind farm on rugged hills southwest of Brooklyn have been made public.

The 28-turbine proposal for Long Gully will be discussed at public meetings in Wellington this week before a resource consent application is lodged with the city council in mid-December.

State-owned Mighty River Power would own and operate the farm and Windflow Technology, a Christchurch turbine manufacturer, would construct it.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Details of a wind farm on rugged hills southwest of Brooklyn have been made public.

The 28-turbine proposal for Long Gully will be discussed at public meetings in Wellington this week before a resource consent application is lodged with the city council in mid-December.

State-owned Mighty River Power would own and operate the farm and Windflow Technology, a Christchurch turbine manufacturer, would construct it.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18836</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>For the birds, not so far</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18531</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Contrary to comments made Monday by Councilman-at-large Jacob Chicatelli, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources has not indicated wind turbines will be taboo on east side property. ...At Monday night's work session, while members were debating the merits of various wind farm proposals, Chicatelli said he was told by a member of the state Division of Wildlife that turbines will never be erected on city-owned land because of bird migratory patterns in the area. Recently, Chicatelli said he learned the comment was made by someone from a federal - not state - wildlife agency. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Contrary to comments made Monday by Councilman-at-large Jacob Chicatelli, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources has not indicated wind turbines will be taboo on east side property. ...At Monday night's work session, while members were debating the merits of various wind farm proposals, Chicatelli said he was told by a member of the state Division of Wildlife that turbines will never be erected on city-owned land because of bird migratory patterns in the area. Recently, Chicatelli said he learned the comment was made by someone from a federal - not state - wildlife agency.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18531</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind project backed for hills</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18178</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Even though an alternative energy project near Lompoc will most likely kill an unknown number of birds or bats, the Santa Barbara County planning staff has recommended that it be approved Tuesday. ...The project, which comprises 65 wind turbines, onsite collector power lines, electrical substation operations and maintenance building and other facilities, would pose several environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. ...Although the final environmental report concluded that a downsized project would be environmentally superior, county planning staff disagreed. 

&quot;The benefits of the full, proposed project far outweigh the adverse environmental impacts associated with it,&quot; the staff report stated. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Even though an alternative energy project near Lompoc will most likely kill an unknown number of birds or bats, the Santa Barbara County planning staff has recommended that it be approved Tuesday. ...The project, which comprises 65 wind turbines, onsite collector power lines, electrical substation operations and maintenance building and other facilities, would pose several environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. ...Although the final environmental report concluded that a downsized project would be environmentally superior, county planning staff disagreed. 

&quot;The benefits of the full, proposed project far outweigh the adverse environmental impacts associated with it,&quot; the staff report stated. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18178</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Project Hayes hearing on hold till 2009</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17277</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Project Hayes wind farm Environment Court hearing has been abandoned until next year after opponents won the right to present new evidence.

Effectively this means all the expert witnesses for both Meridian Energy and appellant groups relating to landscape and visual effects as well as transmission might have to be recalled.

The new evidence relates to cumulative effects based on the Mahinerangi wind farm.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Project Hayes wind farm Environment Court hearing has been abandoned until next year after opponents won the right to present new evidence.

Effectively this means all the expert witnesses for both Meridian Energy and appellant groups relating to landscape and visual effects as well as transmission might have to be recalled.

The new evidence relates to cumulative effects based on the Mahinerangi wind farm.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17277</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine skeptics question effects on environment </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16142</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As Florida Power &amp; Light Co. gets closer to a public hearing on its wind turbine plan, skeptics of the project have plenty of questions left unanswered.

What about the effect on birds? Or sea turtles? And why put turbines in St. Lucie County in the first place? Nick Blount, external affairs manager for FPL on the Treasure Coast, tried to answer some of those questions from about 20 members of the St. Lucie County Conservation Alliance on Wednesday night and promised to try to find answers to others raised by residents.

&quot;I respect people's opinion about our wind project, but what I do want to do is tell our side of the story,&quot; Blount said. &quot;That's what we want.&quot;



 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>As Florida Power &amp; Light Co. gets closer to a public hearing on its wind turbine plan, skeptics of the project have plenty of questions left unanswered.

What about the effect on birds? Or sea turtles? And why put turbines in St. Lucie County in the first place? Nick Blount, external affairs manager for FPL on the Treasure Coast, tried to answer some of those questions from about 20 members of the St. Lucie County Conservation Alliance on Wednesday night and promised to try to find answers to others raised by residents.

&quot;I respect people's opinion about our wind project, but what I do want to do is tell our side of the story,&quot; Blount said. &quot;That's what we want.&quot;



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16142</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine skeptics grill Florida Power &amp; Light official</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16077</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:59:20 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As Florida Power &amp; Light Co. gets closer to a public hearing on its wind turbine plan, skeptics of the project have plenty of questions left unanswered.

What about the effect on birds? Or sea turtles? And why put turbines in St. Lucie County in the first place?

Nick Blount, external affairs manager for FPL on the Treasure Coast, tried to answer some of those questions from about 20 members of the Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County on Wednesday night and promised to try to find answers to others raised by residents. ...
Indian Riverkeeper Kevin Stinnette said he has several issues he still thinks should be addressed, preferably by conducting a full environmental impact statement.

Blount said the company would do what is required, but he didn't commit to a full environmental impact study.

In addition to sensitive wetlands being in the area, Stinnette said he has concerns about the potential effects on sea turtles, fish and birds. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>As Florida Power &amp; Light Co. gets closer to a public hearing on its wind turbine plan, skeptics of the project have plenty of questions left unanswered.

What about the effect on birds? Or sea turtles? And why put turbines in St. Lucie County in the first place?

Nick Blount, external affairs manager for FPL on the Treasure Coast, tried to answer some of those questions from about 20 members of the Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County on Wednesday night and promised to try to find answers to others raised by residents. ...
Indian Riverkeeper Kevin Stinnette said he has several issues he still thinks should be addressed, preferably by conducting a full environmental impact statement.

Blount said the company would do what is required, but he didn't commit to a full environmental impact study.

In addition to sensitive wetlands being in the area, Stinnette said he has concerns about the potential effects on sea turtles, fish and birds. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16077</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Spin or lose?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15782</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ From the early 1980s through the early ‘90s, California was the national leader in wind energy development and power produced by wind farms. ...Are the turbines benefiting one aspect of the environment at the expense of another? Longtime Snow Creek resident Les Starks calls the wind farms &quot;industrial slums&quot; - claiming the windmills have displaced wildlife and degraded the quality of life for nearby residents. &quot;There was a canyon near Whitewater Canyon that used to have thousands of bats,&quot; says Starks, &quot;and now you don't see any.&quot; He's also noticed a decline in turkey buzzards migrating through the pass. ...With wind energy having been harnessed in the Desert for nearly three decades, the next few years will determine its future here. Presently, it accounts for just two percent of California's portfolio. That number surely will rise along with new and bigger windmills - love them or hate them. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>From the early 1980s through the early ‘90s, California was the national leader in wind energy development and power produced by wind farms. ...Are the turbines benefiting one aspect of the environment at the expense of another? Longtime Snow Creek resident Les Starks calls the wind farms &quot;industrial slums&quot; - claiming the windmills have displaced wildlife and degraded the quality of life for nearby residents. &quot;There was a canyon near Whitewater Canyon that used to have thousands of bats,&quot; says Starks, &quot;and now you don't see any.&quot; He's also noticed a decline in turkey buzzards migrating through the pass. ...With wind energy having been harnessed in the Desert for nearly three decades, the next few years will determine its future here. Presently, it accounts for just two percent of California's portfolio. That number surely will rise along with new and bigger windmills - love them or hate them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15782</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind project moving ahead; permit concerns still an issue</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15070</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Highland New Wind Development wind utility project is moving ahead, H.T. 'Mac' McBride told supervisors Tuesday. &quot;We have approval (from VDOT) for both entrances (state line and cattle crossing on Laurel Fork). The power purchase agreement is being worked on by our people in Minnesota.&quot; ...Highland resident Rick Webb told the board, &quot;It has been suggested on multiple occasions that it would be in the county's best interest to require that HNWD develop a habitat conservation plan and obtain an incidental take permit in compliance with the federal Endangered Species Act. The conditional use permit issued by the previous board of supervisors stipulated that HNWD would be required to obtain all required state and federal approvals before the project is allowed to go forward. Both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries have recommended that HNWD obtain an incidental take permit in order to avoid penalties and possible project shut down. The State Corporation Commission acknowledged that HNWD was assuming a business risk by not obtaining an ITP. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Highland New Wind Development wind utility project is moving ahead, H.T. 'Mac' McBride told supervisors Tuesday. &quot;We have approval (from VDOT) for both entrances (state line and cattle crossing on Laurel Fork). The power purchase agreement is being worked on by our people in Minnesota.&quot; ...Highland resident Rick Webb told the board, &quot;It has been suggested on multiple occasions that it would be in the county's best interest to require that HNWD develop a habitat conservation plan and obtain an incidental take permit in compliance with the federal Endangered Species Act. The conditional use permit issued by the previous board of supervisors stipulated that HNWD would be required to obtain all required state and federal approvals before the project is allowed to go forward. Both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries have recommended that HNWD obtain an incidental take permit in order to avoid penalties and possible project shut down. The State Corporation Commission acknowledged that HNWD was assuming a business risk by not obtaining an ITP.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15070</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Somerset windmill plan judged deficient by state</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14373</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A controversial proposal to build 30 wind turbines in an ecologically sensitive watershed containing a wilderness trout stream on Shaffer Mountain in northeastern Somerset County has been judged deficient by the state.
A Feb. 22 letter from the state Department of Environmental Protection identifies more than two dozen deficiencies and concerns in the wind turbine permit application of Gamesa Energy USA, a Spanish wind power developer and turbine manufacturer. It requests additional information. ...&quot;This is an untouched area with a cluster of environmentally sensitive issues,&quot; Mr. Buchan said. &quot;We hope to get Gamesa to see the light. If not, we'll fight it for as long as it takes.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A controversial proposal to build 30 wind turbines in an ecologically sensitive watershed containing a wilderness trout stream on Shaffer Mountain in northeastern Somerset County has been judged deficient by the state.
A Feb. 22 letter from the state Department of Environmental Protection identifies more than two dozen deficiencies and concerns in the wind turbine permit application of Gamesa Energy USA, a Spanish wind power developer and turbine manufacturer. It requests additional information. ...&quot;This is an untouched area with a cluster of environmentally sensitive issues,&quot; Mr. Buchan said. &quot;We hope to get Gamesa to see the light. If not, we'll fight it for as long as it takes.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14373</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
