    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c37+52?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>State windmill plan causing quite a flap</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11428</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Pennsylvania Biological Survey has gone to bat for the bats in a swirling policy debate over whether commercial wind power development should be permitted in state forests.

The debate pits advocates of wind power as an alternative energy source against those who fear that windmills are harmful to bats and birds.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Pennsylvania Biological Survey has gone to bat for the bats in a swirling policy debate over whether commercial wind power development should be permitted in state forests.

The debate pits advocates of wind power as an alternative energy source against those who fear that windmills are harmful to bats and birds. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11428</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>House chairman pushes tougher regulation for wind industry</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9923</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:02:06 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Birds and bats have a powerful advocate in the new Congress.

It's making people in the wind energy industry nervous.

Representative Nick Rahall is chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. Rahall is pushing legislation that would more strictly regulate wind energy to protect the birds and bats that are killed when they fly into wind turbines.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Birds and bats have a powerful advocate in the new Congress.

It's making people in the wind energy industry nervous.

Representative Nick Rahall is chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. Rahall is pushing legislation that would more strictly regulate wind energy to protect the birds and bats that are killed when they fly into wind turbines. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9923</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Bird protection in bill could foul wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9826</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 11:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The wind-energy industry is objecting to federal legislation that seeks to protect birds and bats from wind turbines, arguing the measure would place unnecessary burdens on clean-energy projects.

The Energy Policy Reform and Revitalization Act, a wide-ranging energy bill introduced this month, would create new standards for the placement and construction of turbines and mandate post-construction monitoring of their effects on wildlife.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The wind-energy industry is objecting to federal legislation that seeks to protect birds and bats from wind turbines, arguing the measure would place unnecessary burdens on clean-energy projects.

The Energy Policy Reform and Revitalization Act, a wide-ranging energy bill introduced this month, would create new standards for the placement and construction of turbines and mandate post-construction monitoring of their effects on wildlife. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9826</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Panel: Ducks don't dodge turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9309</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 11:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ WASHINGTON-Migratory birds have a relatively safe trek across the Midwest, but unless the government intervenes thousands of those birds could be reduced to puffs of feathers drifting down from the blades of wind power turbines, wildlife advocates say.

The birds often fly headlong into wind power devices, leaving behind victims with &quot;severed beaks&quot; and &quot;mid-body separation,&quot; said Michael Daulton, of the National Audubon Society.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>WASHINGTON-Migratory birds have a relatively safe trek across the Midwest, but unless the government intervenes thousands of those birds could be reduced to puffs of feathers drifting down from the blades of wind power turbines, wildlife advocates say.

The birds often fly headlong into wind power devices, leaving behind victims with &quot;severed beaks&quot; and &quot;mid-body separation,&quot; said Michael Daulton, of the National Audubon Society. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9309</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Understanding the trade-off: Environmental costs and benefits of industrial wind energy development</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18629</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wildlife expert Dan Boone presented these slides at the 38th North American Symposium on Bat Research held in Scranton, PA in October 2008. Mr. Boone's presentation focused on the trade-offs of wind energy development in Eastern US balancing the benefits of this energy resource against the environmental risks, particularly to bats. Note that slides # 27, 32 and 33 of the presentation provide graphs which quantitatively estimate the potential impacts on bats and forest habitat resulting from the projected intensity of wind energy development within the eastern US states which comprise the bulk of the Appalachian mountain region. The summary slide from the presentation is listed below. The full presentation can be accessed by clicking on the link at the bottom of this page. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wildlife expert Dan Boone presented these slides at the 38th North American Symposium on Bat Research held in Scranton, PA in October 2008. Mr. Boone's presentation focused on the trade-offs of wind energy development in Eastern US balancing the benefits of this energy resource against the environmental risks, particularly to bats. Note that slides # 27, 32 and 33 of the presentation provide graphs which quantitatively estimate the potential impacts on bats and forest habitat resulting from the projected intensity of wind energy development within the eastern US states which comprise the bulk of the Appalachian mountain region. The summary slide from the presentation is listed below. The full presentation can be accessed by clicking on the link at the bottom of this page.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18629</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Wind Energy Development in the Mountains of Virginia</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6215</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <br>
Rick Webb's presentation on October 17 at the Energy Virginia conference provides a thought provoking analysis of the costs and benefits of industrial wind energy.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>
Rick Webb's presentation on October 17 at the Energy Virginia conference provides a thought provoking analysis of the costs and benefits of industrial wind energy.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6215</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Power Facility Siting Case Studies: Community Response</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/106</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ BBC Research &amp; Consulting's 2005 report for the National Wind Coordinating Committee that studies 9 wind plant sitings in an effort to identify circumstances that distinguish welcomed projects from projects that were not accepted by communities. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>BBC Research &amp; Consulting's 2005 report for the National Wind Coordinating Committee that studies 9 wind plant sitings in an effort to identify circumstances that distinguish welcomed projects from projects that were not accepted by communities.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/106</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbines are killers</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9747</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Earlier this month, the National Academy of Science put forward some compelling evidence that industrial wind power has some serious flaws. Also, recent U.S. Congress hearings brought forth several expert testimonies that warn of a potential environmental disaster (birds, bats, etc.) due to poor siting of turbines and lack of accountability. There are gaping holes in the protection of wildlife, birds and bats in particular, from poorly sited, constructed and monitored wind turbines in both the U.S. and Canada. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Earlier this month, the National Academy of Science put forward some compelling evidence that industrial wind power has some serious flaws. Also, recent U.S. Congress hearings brought forth several expert testimonies that warn of a potential environmental disaster (birds, bats, etc.) due to poor siting of turbines and lack of accountability. There are gaping holes in the protection of wildlife, birds and bats in particular, from poorly sited, constructed and monitored wind turbines in both the U.S. and Canada.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9747</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
