    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c36+116?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Plans for a windfarm may raise concerns</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22993</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Nature conservationists are expected to raise concerns over potential plans to place four wind turbines close to an internationally important bird reserve. ...Martin Kerby, RSPB planning officer for the North-east said: ...
&quot;When the planning application is submitted we will be looking very carefully at it. It depends on how many birds are passing through.

&quot;It's about 1km from Saltholme but of most concern is the North Tees mudflats.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Nature conservationists are expected to raise concerns over potential plans to place four wind turbines close to an internationally important bird reserve. ...Martin Kerby, RSPB planning officer for the North-east said: ...
&quot;When the planning application is submitted we will be looking very carefully at it. It depends on how many birds are passing through.

&quot;It's about 1km from Saltholme but of most concern is the North Tees mudflats.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22993</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wyo. wind power boom could drive sage grouse to endangered list </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21455</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Development of wind energy and sage grouse protection are on a collision course in Wyoming, where state officials are worried that a future Endangered Species Act listing for the chicken-like bird could ruin the golden egg laid by the Obama administration's renewable energy mandates. ...&quot;The bird does well in the existing conditions that are out here. It's the new threat from wind energy that has got us so worried,&quot; said Aaron Clark, special adviser on energy infrastructure to Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal (D). &quot;I don't think you could justify a [federal endangered species] listing for that bird in Wyoming without the threat from wind development.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Development of wind energy and sage grouse protection are on a collision course in Wyoming, where state officials are worried that a future Endangered Species Act listing for the chicken-like bird could ruin the golden egg laid by the Obama administration's renewable energy mandates. ...&quot;The bird does well in the existing conditions that are out here. It's the new threat from wind energy that has got us so worried,&quot; said Aaron Clark, special adviser on energy infrastructure to Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal (D). &quot;I don't think you could justify a [federal endangered species] listing for that bird in Wyoming without the threat from wind development.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21455</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>MMS gives Cape Wind favorable review except for birds, navigation and visual impacts</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19587</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Minerals Management Service's 800 page Final Environmental Impact Statement on Cape Wind was released on Friday and in a largely favorable review found nearly all impacts to be negligible or minor.
The few exceptions, where the 130 turbine wind farm would potentially or certainly have moderate to major impact were on birds, especially marine birds such as terns or sea ducks, on navigation and safety of recreational or commercial fishing boats, although those effects could be mitigated, and on visual resources of Nantucket Sound.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Minerals Management Service's 800 page Final Environmental Impact Statement on Cape Wind was released on Friday and in a largely favorable review found nearly all impacts to be negligible or minor.
The few exceptions, where the 130 turbine wind farm would potentially or certainly have moderate to major impact were on birds, especially marine birds such as terns or sea ducks, on navigation and safety of recreational or commercial fishing boats, although those effects could be mitigated, and on visual resources of Nantucket Sound.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19587</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Maps aid habitat: Wind farms, birds a delicate mix</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17003</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A regional conservation group is pointing out where birds and wind farms might not mix. 

A Playa Lakes Joint Venture mapping project shows the few remaining acres of habitat for the lesser prairie chicken and where playa lakes can draw large numbers of migrating birds. 

&quot;There has been a lot of interest from the wind industry, local and state conservation groups and state agencies,&quot; said Megan McLachlan, a geographic-information system analyst for the group. &quot;We've gotten a lot of phone calls the last couple of months asking us to share the data. There's a lot of people working on the issue.&quot; 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A regional conservation group is pointing out where birds and wind farms might not mix. 

A Playa Lakes Joint Venture mapping project shows the few remaining acres of habitat for the lesser prairie chicken and where playa lakes can draw large numbers of migrating birds. 

&quot;There has been a lot of interest from the wind industry, local and state conservation groups and state agencies,&quot; said Megan McLachlan, a geographic-information system analyst for the group. &quot;We've gotten a lot of phone calls the last couple of months asking us to share the data. There's a lot of people working on the issue.&quot; 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17003</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>S. Texas wind farm case on hold; Judge studying arguments filed by King Ranch and environmentalists</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16199</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A federal court judge said Tuesday he needs time to sort through a complicated legal challenge brought by the King Ranch and several environmental groups that want to stop a massive wind farm near the South Texas Gulf Coast.

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel will have to decide if a mid-1990s federal Coastal Zone Management Act requires the state to conduct public hearings before a wind farm can be approved - if it affects private property and if the environmental groups have a right to sue. ...Lawyers for the wind farm developers said wind farms are not like electric utilities, which are subject to regulation.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A federal court judge said Tuesday he needs time to sort through a complicated legal challenge brought by the King Ranch and several environmental groups that want to stop a massive wind farm near the South Texas Gulf Coast.

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel will have to decide if a mid-1990s federal Coastal Zone Management Act requires the state to conduct public hearings before a wind farm can be approved - if it affects private property and if the environmental groups have a right to sue. ...Lawyers for the wind farm developers said wind farms are not like electric utilities, which are subject to regulation.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16199</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm raises environmental impact concerns</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14905</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A giant wind farm in northeast Weld County may be a groundbreaking model of how to generate clean, renewable energy while protecting wildlife occupying the same space.

But it's also been on the receiving end of some environmental criticism. ...Ken Strom, director of bird conservation for Audubon Colorado, said he is disappointed that Cedar Creek's developers did not move all the turbines away from the escarpment. 

&quot;In terms of the outcome of the hearings, I don't think (our concerns) were adequately addressed,&quot; he said. &quot;I think they tried to meet a number of our concerns but they fought to move a minimum of the turbines.&quot;

Strom notes that some birds will be killed as a result of having the turbines within their traditional nesting areas and others will simply avoid the area out of fear of the constantly whooshing towers.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A giant wind farm in northeast Weld County may be a groundbreaking model of how to generate clean, renewable energy while protecting wildlife occupying the same space.

But it's also been on the receiving end of some environmental criticism. ...Ken Strom, director of bird conservation for Audubon Colorado, said he is disappointed that Cedar Creek's developers did not move all the turbines away from the escarpment. 

&quot;In terms of the outcome of the hearings, I don't think (our concerns) were adequately addressed,&quot; he said. &quot;I think they tried to meet a number of our concerns but they fought to move a minimum of the turbines.&quot;

Strom notes that some birds will be killed as a result of having the turbines within their traditional nesting areas and others will simply avoid the area out of fear of the constantly whooshing towers.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14905</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Residents voice opposition to wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13041</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:15:29 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ It wasn't supposed to be a debate Wednesday night. Gamesa invited Tyrone residents to come to an open house and ask questions about what 15 windmills atop Ice Mountain might mean for them. ...But those curious residents were among the few. Dozens turned out, bringing their opposition.

&quot;Not only is it a unique area and a natural heritage area, but it's also an area that provides all the drinking water for the city of Tyrone,&quot; said Dr. Stan Kotala, president of the Juniata Valley Audubon Society.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>It wasn't supposed to be a debate Wednesday night. Gamesa invited Tyrone residents to come to an open house and ask questions about what 15 windmills atop Ice Mountain might mean for them. ...But those curious residents were among the few. Dozens turned out, bringing their opposition.

&quot;Not only is it a unique area and a natural heritage area, but it's also an area that provides all the drinking water for the city of Tyrone,&quot; said Dr. Stan Kotala, president of the Juniata Valley Audubon Society.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13041</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Conservation group sues to stop coastal wind farms</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13020</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The dispute over construction of two wind farms adjacent to the famed King Ranch in south Texas entered the courts Tuesday when an alliance of conservation and related groups filed lawsuits to stop the projects.

The Coastal Habitat Alliance, which includes King Ranch, filed separate lawsuits in state and federal court in Austin. The federal lawsuit claims the state has not done a thorough analysis of the impact the farms and their massive turbines will have on wetlands, habitat, endangered species and migratory birds. It seeks a declaratory judgment and, if needed, an injunction against the developers, whose combined initial investments are expected to top $1 billion.

The state lawsuit claims the Texas Public Utility Commission illegally denied the alliance a chance to intervene in the PUC's hearings on transmission lines for the wind farms. ...But the alliance claims that because Texas receives federal funds to help protect the coastal region through the Coastal Zone Management Act, a thorough environmental review of the wind projects is required.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The dispute over construction of two wind farms adjacent to the famed King Ranch in south Texas entered the courts Tuesday when an alliance of conservation and related groups filed lawsuits to stop the projects.

The Coastal Habitat Alliance, which includes King Ranch, filed separate lawsuits in state and federal court in Austin. The federal lawsuit claims the state has not done a thorough analysis of the impact the farms and their massive turbines will have on wetlands, habitat, endangered species and migratory birds. It seeks a declaratory judgment and, if needed, an injunction against the developers, whose combined initial investments are expected to top $1 billion.

The state lawsuit claims the Texas Public Utility Commission illegally denied the alliance a chance to intervene in the PUC's hearings on transmission lines for the wind farms. ...But the alliance claims that because Texas receives federal funds to help protect the coastal region through the Coastal Zone Management Act, a thorough environmental review of the wind projects is required.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13020</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Local organizations strongly oppose wind farm site on Ice Mountain</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13025</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Tyrone Mayor James Kilmartin has said that 70 percent of borough residents he has been in contact with oppose the wind farm project. This is a similar result to the Harrisburg Patriot News poll that revealed that 83 percent of Pennsylvanians oppose industrial wind farms on state forest lands. 

Juniata Valley Audubon Society (JVAS) President Stan Kotala, M.D. has been at the forefront of the opposition in Gamesa's proposed wind farm on Ice Mountain. He said that the JVAS is not opposed to wind energy, but asks that wind energy be developed in an ecologically sound manner, avoiding ecologically sensitive areas, such as Ice Mountain.

&quot;We ask that wind energy developers follow US Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines calling for the avoidance of migratory pathways and unfragmented forests,&quot; said Kotala.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Tyrone Mayor James Kilmartin has said that 70 percent of borough residents he has been in contact with oppose the wind farm project. This is a similar result to the Harrisburg Patriot News poll that revealed that 83 percent of Pennsylvanians oppose industrial wind farms on state forest lands. 

Juniata Valley Audubon Society (JVAS) President Stan Kotala, M.D. has been at the forefront of the opposition in Gamesa's proposed wind farm on Ice Mountain. He said that the JVAS is not opposed to wind energy, but asks that wind energy be developed in an ecologically sound manner, avoiding ecologically sensitive areas, such as Ice Mountain.

&quot;We ask that wind energy developers follow US Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines calling for the avoidance of migratory pathways and unfragmented forests,&quot; said Kotala. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13025</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Group forming to battle windmill farm project</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12501</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The wide open spaces and natural terrain and wildlife of Southeastern Washington are fading, and some residents would like the encroaching effects of urbanization toned down, such as a proposed project that would place 35 to 50 turbines on Rattlesnake Mountain. 

More than 30 people showed up Saturday at the Richland Community Center for a meeting to oppose a proposed windmill farm at the base of the mountain. ...Rick Leaumont, chairman of the Audubon Society's conservation committee, agreed that urgency in protesting the project is necessary because about 238 bird species have been documented in the area, and would be effected by the windmills. 

&quot;Wildlife needs some kind of solitude, a place that is theirs,&quot; Leaumont said. &quot;Any location on the mountain would be a problem.&quot; 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The wide open spaces and natural terrain and wildlife of Southeastern Washington are fading, and some residents would like the encroaching effects of urbanization toned down, such as a proposed project that would place 35 to 50 turbines on Rattlesnake Mountain. 

More than 30 people showed up Saturday at the Richland Community Center for a meeting to oppose a proposed windmill farm at the base of the mountain. ...Rick Leaumont, chairman of the Audubon Society's conservation committee, agreed that urgency in protesting the project is necessary because about 238 bird species have been documented in the area, and would be effected by the windmills. 

&quot;Wildlife needs some kind of solitude, a place that is theirs,&quot; Leaumont said. &quot;Any location on the mountain would be a problem.&quot; 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12501</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Saturday meeting to marshal Rattlesnake Mountain wind foes</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12465</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Debate over putting wind turbines on Rattlesnake Mountain appears to be maturing faster than plans for the project itself. ...Guettner said Rattlesnake Mountain may be an ideal spot for wind turbines, but not one the public is likely to accept. &quot;I feel like there's a supermajority of people who feel the way I do,&quot; he said. &quot;I think it's time we marshal these people.&quot; ...Rick Leaumont, Audubon's conservation committee chairman, said about 238 bird species have been documented in the area. He said they are regularly coming and going to and from the monument, often crossing the mountain.

&quot;Any location on the mountain would be a problem,&quot; he said. &quot;It's like an airport.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Debate over putting wind turbines on Rattlesnake Mountain appears to be maturing faster than plans for the project itself. ...Guettner said Rattlesnake Mountain may be an ideal spot for wind turbines, but not one the public is likely to accept. &quot;I feel like there's a supermajority of people who feel the way I do,&quot; he said. &quot;I think it's time we marshal these people.&quot; ...Rick Leaumont, Audubon's conservation committee chairman, said about 238 bird species have been documented in the area. He said they are regularly coming and going to and from the monument, often crossing the mountain.

&quot;Any location on the mountain would be a problem,&quot; he said. &quot;It's like an airport.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12465</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ridge Protectors Petition For Change In Barton Town Plan</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12214</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The petition basically duplicates the concerns the USFWS raised two months ago. 

It says that studies at existing wind facilities &quot;have shown high mortality rates for birds and, especially so, for bats. Not mentioned in the hearings nor in any developer studies is the fact that ducks, geese, and other water fowl migrate over these ridge lines and stop over in the wetlands in the Sheffield project area. Threatened species of interior forest birds come north to live here for the warmer months. We are very concerned that their habitat and nesting will be severely interrupted.

&quot;Given the political pressure in Vermont and New England to construct renewable electric generation developments, particularly industrial-scale wind plants, we are concerned that otherwise thoughtful biologists and wildlife experts are being compelled to ignore their best judgment,&quot; it says. &quot;We encourage you and your colleagues in EPA and the Corps of Engineers to exercise your authorities to the fullest and hope that our state and federal officials will encourage you as well.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The petition basically duplicates the concerns the USFWS raised two months ago. 

It says that studies at existing wind facilities &quot;have shown high mortality rates for birds and, especially so, for bats. Not mentioned in the hearings nor in any developer studies is the fact that ducks, geese, and other water fowl migrate over these ridge lines and stop over in the wetlands in the Sheffield project area. Threatened species of interior forest birds come north to live here for the warmer months. We are very concerned that their habitat and nesting will be severely interrupted.

&quot;Given the political pressure in Vermont and New England to construct renewable electric generation developments, particularly industrial-scale wind plants, we are concerned that otherwise thoughtful biologists and wildlife experts are being compelled to ignore their best judgment,&quot; it says. &quot;We encourage you and your colleagues in EPA and the Corps of Engineers to exercise your authorities to the fullest and hope that our state and federal officials will encourage you as well.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12214</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lompoc Wind Farm Could Break Ground this Spring</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11677</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ &quot;Their bird studies were like trying to determine how many kids would go to a school by driving by during Easter vacation,&quot; she said. Taaffe named the California condor, long-eared owl, horned lark, and golden eagle as species at risk. &quot;The blades move at 200 miles per hour at the tip ... Each blade is replaced within a second. That's not terribly slow.&quot; At the DEIR hearing, Audubon California board of directors member Steve Ferry asserted that bird surveys were conducted on only five days and during the afternoon, when birds are least likely to be present. He said the draft neglected mitigation measures such as radar, which could track avian traffic and shut down turbines as needed.

&quot;We know birds will be killed,&quot; Drude acknowledged of the biological impacts. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>&quot;Their bird studies were like trying to determine how many kids would go to a school by driving by during Easter vacation,&quot; she said. Taaffe named the California condor, long-eared owl, horned lark, and golden eagle as species at risk. &quot;The blades move at 200 miles per hour at the tip ... Each blade is replaced within a second. That's not terribly slow.&quot; At the DEIR hearing, Audubon California board of directors member Steve Ferry asserted that bird surveys were conducted on only five days and during the afternoon, when birds are least likely to be present. He said the draft neglected mitigation measures such as radar, which could track avian traffic and shut down turbines as needed.

&quot;We know birds will be killed,&quot; Drude acknowledged of the biological impacts.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11677</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Mollohan Testifies on Impacts of Wind Turbines on Wildlife</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9305</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:59:20 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Washington, DC (HNN) -- U.S. Rep. Alan B. Mollohan, D-WV on Tuesday, May 1, 2007, testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Subcommittee on the impacts of wind turbines on birds and bats. Below is Mollohan's testimony: ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Washington, DC (HNN) -- U.S. Rep. Alan B. Mollohan, D-WV on Tuesday, May 1, 2007, testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Subcommittee on the impacts of wind turbines on birds and bats. Below is Mollohan's testimony:</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9305</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farms feel the chill of public rejection</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/129</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ They introduced the world to &quot;environmentally friendly&quot; energy, but now some of Europe's &quot;greenest&quot; countries are under pressure to backtrack on wind farms as public anger grows over their impact on the countryside. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>They introduced the world to &quot;environmentally friendly&quot; energy, but now some of Europe's &quot;greenest&quot; countries are under pressure to backtrack on wind farms as public anger grows over their impact on the countryside.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/129</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>US Fish and Wildlife Service letter to Gamesa regarding Shaffer Mountain (PA) wind energy proposal</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14579</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ US Fish and Wildlife Service responded to Gamesa Energy USA in regard to whether an “Incidental take” permit could be granted for the Shaffer Mountain wind project proposed for Somerset County, PA. An “Incidental take” permit allows for the destruction of federally listed species. A subset of the letter is included on this page. The full letter, in PDF format, can be accessed by clicking on the link below. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>US Fish and Wildlife Service responded to Gamesa Energy USA in regard to whether an “Incidental take” permit could be granted for the Shaffer Mountain wind project proposed for Somerset County, PA. An “Incidental take” permit allows for the destruction of federally listed species. A subset of the letter is included on this page. The full letter, in PDF format, can be accessed by clicking on the link below.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14579</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ridge Protectors petition letter to FWS</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12334</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Ridge Protectors was an intervenor on the Sheffield Wind case before the Vermont Public Service Board. This petition letter was sent to the US Fish and Wildlife Service in response to the requirement that UPC Wind, the developer, secure a federal permit for wetlands impacts at the site. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Ridge Protectors was an intervenor on the Sheffield Wind case before the Vermont Public Service Board. This petition letter was sent to the US Fish and Wildlife Service in response to the requirement that UPC Wind, the developer, secure a federal permit for wetlands impacts at the site.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12334</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>NY DEC comments on DGEIS for Horse Creek wind power project</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12582</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:29:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) reviewed the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DGEIS) for PPM's Horse Creek wind facility proposed for the New York towns of Clayton and Orleans, Jefferson County. The project consists of approximately 62 wind turbines (130 MW) with 54 turbines in the Town of Clayton and 8 turbines in the Town of Orleans. The project scope also includes construction of two permanent meteorological (met) towers, an operations and maintenance facility, approximately 16 miles of gravel access roads and approximately 28 miles of buried electric collection lines, and an interconnection substation adjacent to the existing electric transmission line.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) reviewed the Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DGEIS) for PPM's Horse Creek wind facility proposed for the New York towns of Clayton and Orleans, Jefferson County. The project consists of approximately 62 wind turbines (130 MW) with 54 turbines in the Town of Clayton and 8 turbines in the Town of Orleans. The project scope also includes construction of two permanent meteorological (met) towers, an operations and maintenance facility, approximately 16 miles of gravel access roads and approximately 28 miles of buried electric collection lines, and an interconnection substation adjacent to the existing electric transmission line. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12582</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lempster Mountain Wind Power Project: Direct Pre-filed Testimony of Lisa Linowes</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7893</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ <br>
Why did you petition to become an intervenor in this matter before the NH SEC? <br>
<br>
With New Hampshire’s recent reinstatement of PILOT agreements and legislative efforts to a Renewable Portfolio Standard, the regulatory groundwork is being laid for more wind facilities to enter the state. Yet, New Hampshire, like many states, has no consistent regulatory process in place for reviewing these projects to ensure our environmental, societal, and economic interests are protected. The work the NH SEC has agreed to undertake in reviewing this application is precedent setting. How the committee approaches its review and the weight it places on arguments presented by all sides will impact other developments in the State as pertains to renewable energy projects. <br>
<br>
There are a multitude of conflicting issues at play when considering any wind project. My commitment to this process is to help provide, to the best of my ability, valuable and timely information that will assist the Committee in making an informed decision on this application. 


 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>
Why did you petition to become an intervenor in this matter before the NH SEC? 

With New Hampshire’s recent reinstatement of PILOT agreements and legislative efforts to a Renewable Portfolio Standard, the regulatory groundwork is being laid for more wind facilities to enter the state. Yet, New Hampshire, like many states, has no consistent regulatory process in place for reviewing these projects to ensure our environmental, societal, and economic interests are protected. The work the NH SEC has agreed to undertake in reviewing this application is precedent setting. How the committee approaches its review and the weight it places on arguments presented by all sides will impact other developments in the State as pertains to renewable energy projects. 

There are a multitude of conflicting issues at play when considering any wind project. My commitment to this process is to help provide, to the best of my ability, valuable and timely information that will assist the Committee in making an informed decision on this application. 


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7893</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Representative Mollohan's Letter to the Public Service Commission of West Virginia</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4325</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ WV's Congressman Mollohan submitted a letter on July 26, 2006 to the WV Public Service Commission (PSC) concerning the Beech Ridge wind energy project proposed for Greenbrier County, WV by Chicago-based Invenergy, Inc.  This wind energy developer successfully pushed through a windplant in Wisconsin nearby the Horicon Marsh - a globally-significant wildlife area and National Wildlife Refuge - despite the widespread outcry by national and local wildlife groups who opposed such close siting.<br />
<br />
 
Mollohan's letter points out that Invenergy disregarded recommendations by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for multi-year pre-construction studies regarding the project's potential impacts on migratory birds and bats.  He also observed that although WV's one operating wind project in Tucker County has been the site of record-setting bat mortality due to collision with turbine blades, the project operator (FPL Energy) has cut off access to the site for scientific study or investigation, even by the National Research Council/National Academies committee charged by the U.S. Congress to study the environmental impacts of wind projects in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands (see footnote #2 in his letter).
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>WV's Congressman Mollohan submitted a letter on July 26, 2006 to the WV Public Service Commission (PSC) concerning the Beech Ridge wind energy project proposed for Greenbrier County, WV by Chicago-based Invenergy, Inc.  This wind energy developer successfully pushed through a windplant in Wisconsin nearby the Horicon Marsh - a globally-significant wildlife area and National Wildlife Refuge - despite the widespread outcry by national and local wildlife groups who opposed such close siting.&lt;
&gt;
&lt;
&gt;
 
Mollohan's letter points out that Invenergy disregarded recommendations by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for multi-year pre-construction studies regarding the project's potential impacts on migratory birds and bats.  He also observed that although WV's one operating wind project in Tucker County has been the site of record-setting bat mortality due to collision with turbine blades, the project operator (FPL Energy) has cut off access to the site for scientific study or investigation, even by the National Research Council/National Academies committee charged by the U.S. Congress to study the environmental impacts of wind projects in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands (see footnote #2 in his letter).
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4325</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
