    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c35?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <a name="12889"></a>
<br />
<a class="xar-title" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/12889">Transmission line loss</a>
<p>The transmission and distribution grid system within the United States <a href="documents/12888">loses approximately 7.2% of the energy</a> to resistance. Given 500,000 MW of energy available on the U.S. grid system, up to 36,000 MW may be lost, representing nearly 3x the installed capacity of wind in the country. If wind facilities are built far from load centers and the energy delivered via an extensive transmission network, it&#39;s reasonable to ask how much of this energy actually reaches its destination. 
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c35?theme=rss#titles">Back to top</a></p>
            <item>
<title>World largest wind turbine (6 MW)</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13943</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:44:29 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The world’s largest wind turbine, the Enercon E-126. The turbine has a rotor blade width of 126 meters (413 feet). This new turbine is officially rated at 6 megawatts but is expected to produce at 7 megawatts.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The world’s largest wind turbine, the Enercon E-126. The turbine has a rotor blade width of 126 meters (413 feet). This new turbine is officially rated at 6 megawatts but is expected to produce at 7 megawatts. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13943</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Skystream 3.7 wind turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11758</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:23:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Unitil's wind turbine sits atop pole near Hampton Beach, NH. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Unitil's wind turbine sits atop pole near Hampton Beach, NH.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11758</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Skystream 3.7 wind turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5301</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ average output of 1.8 kilowatts and a height of 35 feet ]]></content:encoded>
<description>average output of 1.8 kilowatts and a height of 35 feet</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5301</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>How Wind Turbines Work</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5154</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:37:49 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5154</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Off-shore 5M Wind Turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4793</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The offshore wind turbine REpower 5M (rotor diameter: 126 m) after its successful erection in the Scottish North Sea

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The offshore wind turbine REpower 5M (rotor diameter: 126 m) after its successful erection in the Scottish North Sea

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4793</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Floating Wind Turbines Concept</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4788</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:50:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Among three designs for floating giant wind turbines in the deep ocean, MIT research is focusing on the tension leg platform (center), a system that oil companies use for deep-water rigs. Image courtesy / National Renewable Energy Laboratory ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Among three designs for floating giant wind turbines in the deep ocean, MIT research is focusing on the tension leg platform (center), a system that oil companies use for deep-water rigs. Image courtesy / National Renewable Energy Laboratory</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4788</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Underwater Turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4244</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:30:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A turbine being lowered into the East River for testing in 2004. A $1.5 million sonar system is planned to monitor effects on fish populations. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A turbine being lowered into the East River for testing in 2004. A $1.5 million sonar system is planned to monitor effects on fish populations. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4244</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>RE Power's 5.0 megawatt wind turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/3963</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/3963</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Three Different Designs for Floating Wind Turbines</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2942</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Three different designs for floating wind turbines. The following link is the the article in which this appeared:http://www.windwatch.org/news/2938 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Three different designs for floating wind turbines. The following link is the the article in which this appeared:http://www.windwatch.org/news/2938</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2942</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>New GE Wind Turbine-Scale</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2941</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind turbines compared with the Washington Monument in Washington DC. The new GE turbine would be shorter but have a larger rotor diameter (140 meters) than an experimental five-megawatt turbine. The following link is to the article in which this appeared:http://www.windaction.org/news/2938

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind turbines compared with the Washington Monument in Washington DC. The new GE turbine would be shorter but have a larger rotor diameter (140 meters) than an experimental five-megawatt turbine. The following link is to the article in which this appeared:http://www.windaction.org/news/2938

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2941</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Turbine Size (5)</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/764</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/764</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Turbine In Transit</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/829</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/829</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine Turbine Size (4)</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/589</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2005 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/589</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Turbine Size (1) vs Boeing 747</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/370</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/370</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vesta 100 meter Turbine</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/462</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/462</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vestas 1.5-MW model, Tjaereborg test site, western Denmark</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/515</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/515</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Repower 5-MW model prototype</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/516</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/516</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>GE 3.6 MW Model Barrax, Spain</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/487</link>
<pubDate> GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/487</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Energy's Shadow: Turbines Drag Down Power Potential</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38371</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:02:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In several recent published studies, Adams and other researchers have explored the issue of turbines stealing energy from the wind, creating drag or a &quot;wind shadow&quot; of air slowed by the spinning blades. Each turbine added to a particular landscape captures less energy. &quot;You reach a point that if you add any more turbines, you get no more energy,&quot; Adams said. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>In several recent published studies, Adams and other researchers have explored the issue of turbines stealing energy from the wind, creating drag or a &quot;wind shadow&quot; of air slowed by the spinning blades. Each turbine added to a particular landscape captures less energy. &quot;You reach a point that if you add any more turbines, you get no more energy,&quot; Adams said.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38371</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
