	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c35+81?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c35+81?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Ecological impacts of wind energy development on bats: questions, research needs, and hypotheses</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11179" title="Ecological impacts of wind energy development on bats: questions, research needs, and hypotheses"/> 
	<id>.11179</id> 
	<updated>2007-08-06T21:21:11Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-08-06T21:21:11Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">This important peer-reviewed paper written by bat expert Dr. Thomas H. Kunz et al identifies the significant risk wind turbines pose for migratory and local bat populations in the mid-Atlantic Highlands region of the United States. The projected number of annual fatalities of bats at wind energy facilities in the Highlands in the year 2020 can reach up to 111,000 bats.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11179">
		<![CDATA[ This important peer-reviewed paper written by bat expert Dr. Thomas H. Kunz et al identifies the significant risk wind turbines pose for migratory and local bat populations in the mid-Atlantic Highlands region of the United States. The projected number of annual fatalities of bats at wind energy facilities in the Highlands in the year 2020 can reach up to 111,000 bats. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Less For More: The Rube Goldberg Nature of Industrial Wind Development</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7013" title="Less For More: The Rube Goldberg Nature of Industrial Wind Development"/> 
	<id>.7013</id> 
	<updated>2006-12-20T18:42:30Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-12-20T18:42:30Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">
Rube Goldberg would admire the utter purity of the pretensions of wind technology in 
pursuit of a safer modern world, claiming to be saving the environment while wreaking 
havoc upon it. But even he might be astonished by the spin of wind industry spokesmen. 
Consider the comments made by the American Wind Industry Association.s Christina 
Real de Azua in the wake of the virtual nonperformance of California.s more than 13,000 
wind turbines in mitigating the electricity crisis precipitated by last July.s .heat storm.. 
.You really don.t count on wind energy as capacity,. she said. .It is different from other 
technologies because it can.t be dispatched.. (84) The press reported her comments 
solemnly without question, without even a risible chortle. Because they perceive time to 
be running out on fossil fuels, and the lure of non-polluting wind power is so seductive, 
otherwise sensible people are promoting it at any cost, without investigating potential 
negative consequences-- and with no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental 
history or grid operations. &amp;lt;
&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;
&amp;gt;

Eventually, the pedal of wishful thinking and political demagoguery will meet the 
renitent metal of reality in the form of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (85) and 
public resistance, as it has in Denmark and Germany. Ironically, support for industrial 
wind energy because of a desire for reductions in fossil-fueled power and their polluting 
emissions leads ineluctably to nuclear power, particularly under pressure of relentlessly 
increasing demand for reliable electricity. Environmentalists who demand dependable 
power generation at minimum environmental risk should take care about what they wish 
for, more aware that, with Rube Goldberg machines, the desired outcome is unlikely to 
be achieved. Subsidies given to industrial wind technology divert resources that could 
otherwise support effective measures, while uninformed rhetoric on its behalf distracts 
from the discourse.and political action-- necessary for achieving more enlightened 
policy. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7013">
		<![CDATA[ 
Rube Goldberg would admire the utter purity of the pretensions of wind technology in 
pursuit of a safer modern world, claiming to be saving the environment while wreaking 
havoc upon it. But even he might be astonished by the spin of wind industry spokesmen. 
Consider the comments made by the American Wind Industry Association.s Christina 
Real de Azua in the wake of the virtual nonperformance of California.s more than 13,000 
wind turbines in mitigating the electricity crisis precipitated by last July.s .heat storm.. 
.You really don.t count on wind energy as capacity,. she said. .It is different from other 
technologies because it can.t be dispatched.. (84) The press reported her comments 
solemnly without question, without even a risible chortle. Because they perceive time to 
be running out on fossil fuels, and the lure of non-polluting wind power is so seductive, 
otherwise sensible people are promoting it at any cost, without investigating potential 
negative consequences-- and with no apparent knowledge of even recent environmental 
history or grid operations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;

Eventually, the pedal of wishful thinking and political demagoguery will meet the 
renitent metal of reality in the form of the Second Law of Thermodynamics (85) and 
public resistance, as it has in Denmark and Germany. Ironically, support for industrial 
wind energy because of a desire for reductions in fossil-fueled power and their polluting 
emissions leads ineluctably to nuclear power, particularly under pressure of relentlessly 
increasing demand for reliable electricity. Environmentalists who demand dependable 
power generation at minimum environmental risk should take care about what they wish 
for, more aware that, with Rube Goldberg machines, the desired outcome is unlikely to 
be achieved. Subsidies given to industrial wind technology divert resources that could 
otherwise support effective measures, while uninformed rhetoric on its behalf distracts 
from the discourse.and political action-- necessary for achieving more enlightened 
policy.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbines have their tradeoffs</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/6722" title="Wind turbines have their tradeoffs"/> 
	<id>.6722</id> 
	<updated>2006-12-06T12:51:05Z</updated> 
	<published>2006-12-06T12:51:05Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Be wary of individuals preaching the benefits while avoiding mention of ill effects from wind turbines. They probably are set to make a bundle off the things. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/6722">
		<![CDATA[ Be wary of individuals preaching the benefits while avoiding mention of ill effects from wind turbines. They probably are set to make a bundle off the things. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
