    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c120+39?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Proposed Llandudno Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9800</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 11:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An artist's impression of a proposed windfarm off Llandudno ]]></content:encoded>
<description>An artist's impression of a proposed windfarm off Llandudno</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9800</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7333</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7333</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Cefn Croes in Wales from Pen y Garn</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/463</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/463</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Beinn an Tuirc, Scotland</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/480</link>
<pubDate> GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/480</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Big name backing for wind farm fight</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23390</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:05:06 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Big name backing has come forward in opposition to two proposed wind farms at Spaldington who claim the turbines would be &quot;visually horrific, inappropriate and ineffective&quot;.

Throwing their weight behind the STOP (Spaldington Turbines Opposition Project) group is not only Howden and Haltemprice MP David Davies but MEP Godfrey Bloom and international best-selling author Frederick Forsyth. ...David Davis told the Courier this week: &quot;Both of these proposed wind farms would seriously blight the lives of people who live nearby. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Big name backing has come forward in opposition to two proposed wind farms at Spaldington who claim the turbines would be &quot;visually horrific, inappropriate and ineffective&quot;.

Throwing their weight behind the STOP (Spaldington Turbines Opposition Project) group is not only Howden and Haltemprice MP David Davies but MEP Godfrey Bloom and international best-selling author Frederick Forsyth. ...David Davis told the Courier this week: &quot;Both of these proposed wind farms would seriously blight the lives of people who live nearby.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23390</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Cheers as windfarm plan is rejected</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22741</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Aberdeenshire councillors were cheered when they agreed to throw out plans for a windfarm on a scenically important hill between the Don and Dee valleys. 

The response came from campaigners opposed to a Welsh company's plans, attending a meeting at the Stewart's Hall in Huntly on Tuesday. 

Members of the Marr Area Committee accepted the view of their planners that the proposed wind turbines would have an unacceptable impact, on a sensitive site, close to the Cairngorms National Park. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Aberdeenshire councillors were cheered when they agreed to throw out plans for a windfarm on a scenically important hill between the Don and Dee valleys. 

The response came from campaigners opposed to a Welsh company's plans, attending a meeting at the Stewart's Hall in Huntly on Tuesday. 

Members of the Marr Area Committee accepted the view of their planners that the proposed wind turbines would have an unacceptable impact, on a sensitive site, close to the Cairngorms National Park. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22741</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Planners side with objectors over windfarm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22678</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:14:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Nearly 600 letters of objection have been sent to Aberdeenshire Council calling for the refusal of plans for seven wind turbines on the ridge of Pressendye hill, near Cushnie.

Council planners have agreed with objectors and recommended the proposal for refusal over fears that the 410ft turbines would have &quot;unacceptable adverse visual impacts&quot; on the surrounding countryside.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Nearly 600 letters of objection have been sent to Aberdeenshire Council calling for the refusal of plans for seven wind turbines on the ridge of Pressendye hill, near Cushnie.

Council planners have agreed with objectors and recommended the proposal for refusal over fears that the 410ft turbines would have &quot;unacceptable adverse visual impacts&quot; on the surrounding countryside.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22678</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>New hope for ‘devastating' wind farm campaigners </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22621</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:39:34 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The wind farm has faced opposition from environmental groups Plans for a massive Shetland Islands wind farm which campaigners believe will have a devastating effect on the environment could be blocked by a landmark report.
A report by the Scottish Parliament last week warned of the &quot;significant adverse&quot; impact of another wind farm on Lewis in the Hebrides. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The wind farm has faced opposition from environmental groups Plans for a massive Shetland Islands wind farm which campaigners believe will have a devastating effect on the environment could be blocked by a landmark report.
A report by the Scottish Parliament last week warned of the &quot;significant adverse&quot; impact of another wind farm on Lewis in the Hebrides. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22621</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Row over mansion 'ruined' by wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22586</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ It is a baroque masterpiece designed by one of the world's greatest architects and among the north of Scotland's biggest tourist attractions.
Looming above are pieces of 21st-century engineering kit that rise to 330 feet above the skyline.

Now, Scotland's cultural watchdog, Historic Scotland, has been accused of failing to protect the 18th-century Duff House from the effects of massive wind turbines.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>It is a baroque masterpiece designed by one of the world's greatest architects and among the north of Scotland's biggest tourist attractions.
Looming above are pieces of 21st-century engineering kit that rise to 330 feet above the skyline.

Now, Scotland's cultural watchdog, Historic Scotland, has been accused of failing to protect the 18th-century Duff House from the effects of massive wind turbines.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22586</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Landmark report bounces wind farm plans and sets a precedent for scenic areas</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22566</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Isle of Lewis is an area of outstanding beauty Conservation campaigners have welcomed a Scottish Parliament report that has slated plans for Lewis wind farm because it would destroy the scenic view. ...The Report - commissioned by Scottish Ministers - concluded: &quot;Support for renewable energy development and the need to protect and enhance Scotland's natural and historic environment must be regarded as compatible goals. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Isle of Lewis is an area of outstanding beauty Conservation campaigners have welcomed a Scottish Parliament report that has slated plans for Lewis wind farm because it would destroy the scenic view. ...The Report - commissioned by Scottish Ministers - concluded: &quot;Support for renewable energy development and the need to protect and enhance Scotland's natural and historic environment must be regarded as compatible goals.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22566</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Misleading images, but you'll grow to like wind turbines says Minister</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22580</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A wind farm company was 'counter-productive' in misleading people living in north Northumberland over the height of turbines planned near to their homes, the Government's energy minister has said. ...E.ON fell foul of the Advertising Standards Agency after promotional photomontages for the proposed West Ancroft installation showed turbines only 43 metres tall.

Two complaints against the company were upheld, that the images were misleading and breached rules on truthfulness.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A wind farm company was 'counter-productive' in misleading people living in north Northumberland over the height of turbines planned near to their homes, the Government's energy minister has said. ...E.ON fell foul of the Advertising Standards Agency after promotional photomontages for the proposed West Ancroft installation showed turbines only 43 metres tall.

Two complaints against the company were upheld, that the images were misleading and breached rules on truthfulness.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22580</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Extra turbines refused over visual impact</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22177</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The installation of three further turbines at a wind farm in west Wales has been rejected after an inspector concluded that their visual impact on users of a nearby road would be unacceptable. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The installation of three further turbines at a wind farm in west Wales has been rejected after an inspector concluded that their visual impact on users of a nearby road would be unacceptable.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22177</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Beauty spots could become wind farms </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21923</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) like the Lake District national park could be the sites of new energy infrastructure including wind farms, Ed Miliband has suggested. 

Asked if wind farms could be considered in AONBs, Mr Miliband said: &quot;In exceptional circumstances, it may be possible for some limited development to take place without unacceptable impacts on these important sites.&quot; 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) like the Lake District national park could be the sites of new energy infrastructure including wind farms, Ed Miliband has suggested. 

Asked if wind farms could be considered in AONBs, Mr Miliband said: &quot;In exceptional circumstances, it may be possible for some limited development to take place without unacceptable impacts on these important sites.&quot; 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21923</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Proposed wind turbine would damage natural beauty, say councillors</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21698</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A wind turbine proposed for a countryside location at Hooksway would damage an area of outstanding natural beauty and the setting of a listed building, district councillors ruled.
The northern area development control committee voted 6-4 to refuse planning permission for the turbine, at Hooksway Lane.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A wind turbine proposed for a countryside location at Hooksway would damage an area of outstanding natural beauty and the setting of a listed building, district councillors ruled.
The northern area development control committee voted 6-4 to refuse planning permission for the turbine, at Hooksway Lane. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21698</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Blimp shows turbine height</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21258</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Campaigners fighting plans for a wind farm near the Naseby battlefield site say new proposals to move the turbines further east will make no difference to their visual impact for villagers. ...the latest plans place the turbines on lower ground further east, still south of the A14 but closer to Kelmarsh Hall.

Eon says this will create less visual impact on the villages of Naseby and Haselbech.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Campaigners fighting plans for a wind farm near the Naseby battlefield site say new proposals to move the turbines further east will make no difference to their visual impact for villagers. ...the latest plans place the turbines on lower ground further east, still south of the A14 but closer to Kelmarsh Hall.

Eon says this will create less visual impact on the villages of Naseby and Haselbech.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21258</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm developer comes under fire over 'inaccurate' images</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21110</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 11:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Derek Woolerton, a chartered landscape architect, and expert witness for Northumberland County Council, was cross-examined by the appellants yesterday.

When questioned by Elizabeth Dunn, advocate for Moorsyde Wind Farm Ltd, he said some photomontages produced in support of the Moorsyde application were 'highly unsatisfactory and quite unhelpful.'
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Derek Woolerton, a chartered landscape architect, and expert witness for Northumberland County Council, was cross-examined by the appellants yesterday.

When questioned by Elizabeth Dunn, advocate for Moorsyde Wind Farm Ltd, he said some photomontages produced in support of the Moorsyde application were 'highly unsatisfactory and quite unhelpful.'
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21110</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm plan 'no threat' to historic village</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19551</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:17:07 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A campaign to stop a huge wind farm being built near Abbots Bromley has been dealt a blow after heritage experts claimed it did not pose a risk.
Council-hired consultants - in their first appraisal for 12 years - have ignored fears that plans to put up eight 115 metre-high turbines in Bagots Park could ruin the village's conservation area.

Instead, they say the damage caused to historic buildings by juggernauts rumbling down the high street is a more pressing concern.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A campaign to stop a huge wind farm being built near Abbots Bromley has been dealt a blow after heritage experts claimed it did not pose a risk.
Council-hired consultants - in their first appraisal for 12 years - have ignored fears that plans to put up eight 115 metre-high turbines in Bagots Park could ruin the village's conservation area.

Instead, they say the damage caused to historic buildings by juggernauts rumbling down the high street is a more pressing concern.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19551</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Protest group plans balloon demo against turbine plan</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19404</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19404</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Heritage agency hits out at attempt to extend windfarm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18949</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:04:37 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A bid to extend a controversial windfarm near a historic Banffshire castle has been criticised by Historic Scotland officials and council planning chiefs. ...Historic Scotland had raised concerns that the two turbines would have a &quot;severe&quot; visual impact on the unoccupied castle. ...The proposed turbine would be some 3,700ft from the castle, while the other two would be closer, around 2,600ft away.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A bid to extend a controversial windfarm near a historic Banffshire castle has been criticised by Historic Scotland officials and council planning chiefs. ...Historic Scotland had raised concerns that the two turbines would have a &quot;severe&quot; visual impact on the unoccupied castle. ...The proposed turbine would be some 3,700ft from the castle, while the other two would be closer, around 2,600ft away.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18949</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Hundreds oppose wind farm plans </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18928</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Energiekontor Uk Ltd wants to put five 328ft (100m) turbines at Brightenber Hill near Gargrave, Skipton. 

A 250-strong group of residents have formed Friends of Craven Landscape and are campaigning against the plans. 

Craven Council has received 600 letters of objection and a 600-signature petition, but its planning committee has been asked to approve the plans. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Energiekontor Uk Ltd wants to put five 328ft (100m) turbines at Brightenber Hill near Gargrave, Skipton. 

A 250-strong group of residents have formed Friends of Craven Landscape and are campaigning against the plans. 

Craven Council has received 600 letters of objection and a 600-signature petition, but its planning committee has been asked to approve the plans. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18928</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
