	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c117+46?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c117+46?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <entry>
	<title>Critics say wind turbines hurt land values </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23086" title="Critics say wind turbines hurt land values "/> 
	<id>.23086</id> 
	<updated>2009-09-11T06:59:40Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-09-11T06:59:40Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Land values have fallen on properties near wind turbines built as part of the largest wind power projects in the state, a study funded by wind-power critics says.

The study found property values have fallen by at least 19% for sales of land near the We Energies wind farm in Fond du Lac County, and at least 12% for sales of land near Invenergy LLC's Forward Wind project in Fond du Lac and Dodge counties, a report by Appraisal Group One says.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23086">
		<![CDATA[ Land values have fallen on properties near wind turbines built as part of the largest wind power projects in the state, a study funded by wind-power critics says.

The study found property values have fallen by at least 19% for sales of land near the We Energies wind farm in Fond du Lac County, and at least 12% for sales of land near Invenergy LLC's Forward Wind project in Fond du Lac and Dodge counties, a report by Appraisal Group One says.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Nuns decide to pass on Ridgeville property; Cite possibility of wind turbines for decision</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22622" title="Nuns decide to pass on Ridgeville property; Cite possibility of wind turbines for decision"/> 
	<id>.22622</id> 
	<updated>2009-08-06T17:51:18Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-08-06T17:51:18Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Cistercian nuns are moving from Prairie du Sac, but a site for a new monastery in the Town of Ridgeville is no longer one of several considered by the religious community.

According to Sister Roberta Boyer ...the Ridgeville site, land owned by Ryszard Borys, was taken off the table because of the wind farm situation in the township.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/22622">
		<![CDATA[ Cistercian nuns are moving from Prairie du Sac, but a site for a new monastery in the Town of Ridgeville is no longer one of several considered by the religious community.

According to Sister Roberta Boyer ...the Ridgeville site, land owned by Ryszard Borys, was taken off the table because of the wind farm situation in the township.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Prince Edward flip flop on windmill meetings</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21714" title="Prince Edward flip flop on windmill meetings"/> 
	<id>.21714</id> 
	<updated>2009-06-24T16:17:51Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-06-24T16:17:51Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A full gallery last night at Prince Edward County Council. The crowd was made up of local real estate professionals, and tourism business operators. They are dead set against industrial wind farms anywhere near homes and business in the County.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21714">
		<![CDATA[ A full gallery last night at Prince Edward County Council. The crowd was made up of local real estate professionals, and tourism business operators. They are dead set against industrial wind farms anywhere near homes and business in the County. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Property values could drop if windmills rise </title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21350" title="Property values could drop if windmills rise "/> 
	<id>.21350</id> 
	<updated>2009-05-25T11:47:53Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-05-25T11:47:53Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The group fighting Shear Wind's Glen Dhu turbine project says property values could drop in the area if the development goes ahead.

Susan Overmyer, media relations for the Eco Awareness Society, said several recent studies show home values could deteriorate by &amp;quot;20 to 30 per cent&amp;quot; if turbines are built in the proposed area near Baileys Brook.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/21350">
		<![CDATA[ The group fighting Shear Wind's Glen Dhu turbine project says property values could drop in the area if the development goes ahead.

Susan Overmyer, media relations for the Eco Awareness Society, said several recent studies show home values could deteriorate by &amp;quot;20 to 30 per cent&amp;quot; if turbines are built in the proposed area near Baileys Brook.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farms change land values</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18778" title="Wind farms change land values"/> 
	<id>.18778</id> 
	<updated>2008-11-14T02:29:03Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-11-14T02:29:03Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Wind farms are blowing land values off course, slashing property tags by up to a third in some areas and lifting others by as much $50,000 per turbine.
A new study shows the presence of wind turbines significantly influence land values - but it's not all bad.
The study co-incides with a new push by the Federal Government to speed up the building opf wind farms across Australia.

Ballarat-based value Alan Hives said there had now been enough sales of property featuring or near wind farms to draw some conclusions of their impact on property values.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18778">
		<![CDATA[ Wind farms are blowing land values off course, slashing property tags by up to a third in some areas and lifting others by as much $50,000 per turbine.
A new study shows the presence of wind turbines significantly influence land values - but it's not all bad.
The study co-incides with a new push by the Federal Government to speed up the building opf wind farms across Australia.

Ballarat-based value Alan Hives said there had now been enough sales of property featuring or near wind farms to draw some conclusions of their impact on property values.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbine homes threat</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18329" title="Wind turbine homes threat"/> 
	<id>.18329</id> 
	<updated>2008-10-10T01:37:54Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-10-10T01:37:54Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A proposed 120-metre wind turbine would knock 50 per cent off the value of thousands of nearby homes, an action group claims.

Save Our Skyline (SOS) was formed in response to a planned turbine taller than Wakefield Cathedral at Coca Cola's warehouse at Wakefield 41 Industrial Park.

SOS claims 3,800 homes within a mile radius would see 54 per cent knocked of their value by the turbine.

The information comes from a recent study by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/18329">
		<![CDATA[ A proposed 120-metre wind turbine would knock 50 per cent off the value of thousands of nearby homes, an action group claims.

Save Our Skyline (SOS) was formed in response to a planned turbine taller than Wakefield Cathedral at Coca Cola's warehouse at Wakefield 41 Industrial Park.

SOS claims 3,800 homes within a mile radius would see 54 per cent knocked of their value by the turbine.

The information comes from a recent study by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Hampshire commissioners asked to reverse opposition to power line</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/15712" title="Hampshire commissioners asked to reverse opposition to power line"/> 
	<id>.15712</id> 
	<updated>2008-05-07T19:37:50Z</updated> 
	<published>2008-05-07T19:37:50Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Apparently hoping that a proposed agreement between the staff of the West Virginia Public Service Commission and Allegheny Energy would put a better face on the utility's proposed Trans-Allegheny Interstate Power Line project, the Hampshire County Commission received an e-mail request to reverse its opposition to the project.

Commissioners Don Cookman, Steve Slonaker and Robert Hott, however, all agreed that would not happen. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/15712">
		<![CDATA[ Apparently hoping that a proposed agreement between the staff of the West Virginia Public Service Commission and Allegheny Energy would put a better face on the utility's proposed Trans-Allegheny Interstate Power Line project, the Hampshire County Commission received an e-mail request to reverse its opposition to the project.

Commissioners Don Cookman, Steve Slonaker and Robert Hott, however, all agreed that would not happen.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>RELEASE: Windfarms devalue land</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13217" title="RELEASE: Windfarms devalue land"/> 
	<id>.13217</id> 
	<updated>2007-12-17T05:42:34Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-12-17T05:42:34Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Victorian Nationals Energy spokesman Peter Hall has called on the Government to acknowledge that windfarms devalue properties surrounding the land on which they are sited, and to review planning guidelines to reflect the drop in value. 

Mr Hall said that irrefutable proof of property devaluation was contained in conditions attached to a recent planning permit issued by South Gippsland Shire Council. The condition, attached to a permit to subdivide land adjoining the proposed Bald Hills wind energy facility, requires future land owners to be advised that &amp;quot;residents on the lots may experience detrimental amenity affects arising from the facility such as noise, blade glint and blade flicker.&amp;quot; ...&amp;quot;The Government's renewable energy policies should be targeted at those renewables that have less negative environmental impacts such as solar, geothermal and bio-fuels,&amp;quot; Mr Hall concluded. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/13217">
		<![CDATA[ Victorian Nationals Energy spokesman Peter Hall has called on the Government to acknowledge that windfarms devalue properties surrounding the land on which they are sited, and to review planning guidelines to reflect the drop in value. 

Mr Hall said that irrefutable proof of property devaluation was contained in conditions attached to a recent planning permit issued by South Gippsland Shire Council. The condition, attached to a permit to subdivide land adjoining the proposed Bald Hills wind energy facility, requires future land owners to be advised that &amp;quot;residents on the lots may experience detrimental amenity affects arising from the facility such as noise, blade glint and blade flicker.&amp;quot; ...&amp;quot;The Government's renewable energy policies should be targeted at those renewables that have less negative environmental impacts such as solar, geothermal and bio-fuels,&amp;quot; Mr Hall concluded. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Turbines have 'horrific impact' on village life</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11129" title="Turbines have 'horrific impact' on village life"/> 
	<id>.11129</id> 
	<updated>2007-08-03T10:57:17Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-08-03T10:57:17Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">CAMPAIGNERS against plans for a new wind farm between Bagthorpe, Barmer and Syderstone have been told of the horrific impact turbines can have on village life.

A packed public meeting in Bircham Newton heard from a number of guest speakers who gave grave warnings about the health impact, noise disturbances and threat to wildlife which could stem from the five turbines earmarked for the villages.

Included among the speakers was Jane Davis, of Deeping St Nicholas, Lincolnshire, who described the persistent noise problems she has faced from a wind farm near her home.

She also spoke of how the value of her property has plummeted since the development was completed.

Syderstone resident Reg Thompson, a member of the action group formed to oppose the plans, said: &amp;quot;People are very concerned about this.

&amp;quot;There are moves being made in Europe to ban wind farms that are within two kilometres of housing and we hope that becomes legislation because every house in Syderstone falls within that radius.

&amp;quot;People are very upset. We have seen housing deals fall through as people no longer want to move here. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/11129">
		<![CDATA[ CAMPAIGNERS against plans for a new wind farm between Bagthorpe, Barmer and Syderstone have been told of the horrific impact turbines can have on village life.

A packed public meeting in Bircham Newton heard from a number of guest speakers who gave grave warnings about the health impact, noise disturbances and threat to wildlife which could stem from the five turbines earmarked for the villages.

Included among the speakers was Jane Davis, of Deeping St Nicholas, Lincolnshire, who described the persistent noise problems she has faced from a wind farm near her home.

She also spoke of how the value of her property has plummeted since the development was completed.

Syderstone resident Reg Thompson, a member of the action group formed to oppose the plans, said: &amp;quot;People are very concerned about this.

&amp;quot;There are moves being made in Europe to ban wind farms that are within two kilometres of housing and we hope that becomes legislation because every house in Syderstone falls within that radius.

&amp;quot;People are very upset. We have seen housing deals fall through as people no longer want to move here.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind energy developer faces counter-exhibition</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10614" title="Wind energy developer faces counter-exhibition"/> 
	<id>.10614</id> 
	<updated>2007-07-09T11:36:55Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-07-09T11:36:55Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">But campaigners from local pressure group Vortex massed outside the venue and canvassed the opinions of visitors leaving the exhibition.

Vortex member Roger Wytcherley, aged 55, of Napley Heath, said the majority of people were opposed to the plans.

&amp;quot;Everybody has been very willing to tell us their feelings, and not many are for the wind farm,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;A lot of people say their questions are evaded and washed over. People are most concerned about noise and loss of equity in their houses. People are not buying houses around here because of the threat of the wind farm. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10614">
		<![CDATA[ But campaigners from local pressure group Vortex massed outside the venue and canvassed the opinions of visitors leaving the exhibition.

Vortex member Roger Wytcherley, aged 55, of Napley Heath, said the majority of people were opposed to the plans.

&amp;quot;Everybody has been very willing to tell us their feelings, and not many are for the wind farm,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;A lot of people say their questions are evaded and washed over. People are most concerned about noise and loss of equity in their houses. People are not buying houses around here because of the threat of the wind farm.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm opponents to get day in court</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10045" title="Wind farm opponents to get day in court"/> 
	<id>.10045</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-08T10:47:42Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-08T10:47:42Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">In a 4-1 decision, state Supreme Court justices said a Grant County judge was wrong to dismiss a complaint filed by a group of homeowners opposed to a huge wind power facility planned for a site nearby.

Now a nuisance case against two companies that want to build the $300 million wind farm can go forward after a circuit judge dismissed the case last year.

&amp;quot;Our decision in this case is merely that the (homeowners) have alleged sufficient facts to avoid dismissal on the pleadings,&amp;quot; wrote Justice Spike Maynard for the majority in the opinion released today.

&amp;quot;In other words, the (homeowners) should have their day in court. Beyond this, we offer no opinion on the ultimate success or failure of the (homeowners') claim.&amp;quot; </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10045">
		<![CDATA[ In a 4-1 decision, state Supreme Court justices said a Grant County judge was wrong to dismiss a complaint filed by a group of homeowners opposed to a huge wind power facility planned for a site nearby.

Now a nuisance case against two companies that want to build the $300 million wind farm can go forward after a circuit judge dismissed the case last year.

&amp;quot;Our decision in this case is merely that the (homeowners) have alleged sufficient facts to avoid dismissal on the pleadings,&amp;quot; wrote Justice Spike Maynard for the majority in the opinion released today.

&amp;quot;In other words, the (homeowners) should have their day in court. Beyond this, we offer no opinion on the ultimate success or failure of the (homeowners') claim.&amp;quot;  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>State Supreme Court rules against wind farm</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10043" title="State Supreme Court rules against wind farm"/> 
	<id>.10043</id> 
	<updated>2007-06-08T10:43:36Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-06-08T10:43:36Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The state Supreme Court has breathed new life into a lawsuit challenging a $300 million wind farm in the Eastern Panhandle.

In a ruling issued Friday, the court said a Grant County Circuit judge had no legal basis to dismiss the suit and sent it back for more proceedings.

The decision is a victory for the plaintiffs, a group of homeowners who live near the proposed NedPower Mount Storm wind farm in the Grassy Ridge area. The homeowners contend their property values will plunge if the 10-mile string of 330-foot-high-turbines is completed. The Supreme Court's action gives them a chance to prove that claim. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/10043">
		<![CDATA[ The state Supreme Court has breathed new life into a lawsuit challenging a $300 million wind farm in the Eastern Panhandle.

In a ruling issued Friday, the court said a Grant County Circuit judge had no legal basis to dismiss the suit and sent it back for more proceedings.

The decision is a victory for the plaintiffs, a group of homeowners who live near the proposed NedPower Mount Storm wind farm in the Grassy Ridge area. The homeowners contend their property values will plunge if the 10-mile string of 330-foot-high-turbines is completed. The Supreme Court's action gives them a chance to prove that claim.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title> Wind farms offer more power, possible problems</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9325" title=" Wind farms offer more power, possible problems"/> 
	<id>.9325</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-03T10:35:13Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-03T10:35:13Z</published> 
	<summary type="text"></summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9325">
		<![CDATA[  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm protection plan will not be required</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9286" title="Wind farm protection plan will not be required"/> 
	<id>.9286</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-02T12:35:59Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-02T12:35:59Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">After an executive session Monday night, the Stephenson County Planning and Development Committee approved motions recommending that the county not require a homeowner protection plan for the local wind farms.

In a unanimous vote, the committee endorsed removing the stipulations in the wind farm special-use permits that require the county to create a protection plan. The full County Board will likely vote on this issue at its next meeting at 6:30 p.m. May 9. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9286">
		<![CDATA[ After an executive session Monday night, the Stephenson County Planning and Development Committee approved motions recommending that the county not require a homeowner protection plan for the local wind farms.

In a unanimous vote, the committee endorsed removing the stipulations in the wind farm special-use permits that require the county to create a protection plan. The full County Board will likely vote on this issue at its next meeting at 6:30 p.m. May 9.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Communities should generate wind projects</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9283" title="Communities should generate wind projects"/> 
	<id>.9283</id> 
	<updated>2007-05-02T11:23:38Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-05-02T11:23:38Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">THERE'S TROUBLE brewing in Nova Scotia's quest for wind energy.

We all know the importance of developing our valuable abundance of clean, green renewable energy in order to offset the greenhouse gases produced by Nova Scotia Power's coal-fired generation plants. Our government has legislated aggressive renewable energy targets for the near future.

So wind energy is good, right?

Well not always, according to many of the folks from Pugwash. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9283">
		<![CDATA[ THERE'S TROUBLE brewing in Nova Scotia's quest for wind energy.

We all know the importance of developing our valuable abundance of clean, green renewable energy in order to offset the greenhouse gases produced by Nova Scotia Power's coal-fired generation plants. Our government has legislated aggressive renewable energy targets for the near future.

So wind energy is good, right?

Well not always, according to many of the folks from Pugwash.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Foes of wind farm take case to state high court</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9038" title="Foes of wind farm take case to state high court"/> 
	<id>.9038</id> 
	<updated>2007-04-18T11:02:56Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-04-18T11:02:56Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Property values were at the center of a court case that pits homeowners against a planned $300 million wind farm in West Virginia's Eastern Panhandle that one lawyer labeled a &amp;quot;brothel on top of the hill.&amp;quot;

The state Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case that pits a group of property owners against NedPower Mount Storm LLC and its owner, Shell Windenergy Inc. The companies want to build a 10 1/2-mile string of 200 wind turbines along a ridge top in Grant County.

Residents claim the project would severely damage the value of their property. The companies argue the 330-foot-tall turbines will not only bring economic gain to the area, but the homeowners' concerns have already been dismissed by the state Public Service Commission. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/9038">
		<![CDATA[ Property values were at the center of a court case that pits homeowners against a planned $300 million wind farm in West Virginia's Eastern Panhandle that one lawyer labeled a &amp;quot;brothel on top of the hill.&amp;quot;

The state Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case that pits a group of property owners against NedPower Mount Storm LLC and its owner, Shell Windenergy Inc. The companies want to build a 10 1/2-mile string of 200 wind turbines along a ridge top in Grant County.

Residents claim the project would severely damage the value of their property. The companies argue the 330-foot-tall turbines will not only bring economic gain to the area, but the homeowners' concerns have already been dismissed by the state Public Service Commission.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>The Davisâ€™s story</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8980" title="The Davis&#226;€™s story"/> 
	<id>.8980</id> 
	<updated>2007-04-16T10:54:45Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-04-16T10:54:45Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A family who live in the shadow of a wind farm in Lincolnshire say they have &amp;quot;lost everything&amp;quot; just because of the noise it makes.

Farmer Julian Davis, his wife Jane and their teenage daughter have already had to rent a separate house to sleep in because they are kept awake by the sound of the eight turbines.

They claim their home, formerly worth &#194;&#163;170,000, cannot be sold because it is so blighted by noise pollution but they may abandon it anyway. 


http://www.windaction.org/documents/7337</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8980">
		<![CDATA[ A family who live in the shadow of a wind farm in Lincolnshire say they have &amp;quot;lost everything&amp;quot; just because of the noise it makes.

Farmer Julian Davis, his wife Jane and their teenage daughter have already had to rent a separate house to sleep in because they are kept awake by the sound of the eight turbines.

They claim their home, formerly worth &#194;&#163;170,000, cannot be sold because it is so blighted by noise pollution but they may abandon it anyway. 


http://www.windaction.org/documents/7337 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind turbines â€˜are ruining our quality of lifeâ€™</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8979" title="Wind turbines &#226;€˜are ruining our quality of life&#226;€™"/> 
	<id>.8979</id> 
	<updated>2007-04-16T10:48:52Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-04-16T10:48:52Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The majority of people living near wind turbines believe that the noise they make is ruining their health and quality of life, a report has revealed.

Neighbours also claim that the constant hum and the loud &amp;quot;whooshing&amp;quot; sound made by the blades in high winds is destroying the value of their homes.

A survey of people whose homes are situated within 1.2 miles of turbines has shown that three-quarters of them feel that the noise has damaged their quality of life while four out of five say it has affected their health. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8979">
		<![CDATA[ The majority of people living near wind turbines believe that the noise they make is ruining their health and quality of life, a report has revealed.

Neighbours also claim that the constant hum and the loud &amp;quot;whooshing&amp;quot; sound made by the blades in high winds is destroying the value of their homes.

A survey of people whose homes are situated within 1.2 miles of turbines has shown that three-quarters of them feel that the noise has damaged their quality of life while four out of five say it has affected their health.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Agent: Cottage values blown away by wind</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8931" title="Agent: Cottage values blown away by wind"/> 
	<id>.8931</id> 
	<updated>2007-04-13T11:08:57Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-04-13T11:08:57Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">PUGWASH - A proposed wind farm near here would hurt the area's well-established cottage industry, a real estate agent said Thursday.

&amp;quot;This is cottage country and on its own it is a major industry that has resulted in property values doubling several times over in recent years, but we will see property values drop 30 to 50 per cent as soon as this project is approved,&amp;quot; said Peter Finley.

&amp;quot;I've already seen buyers back away from deals and I know of people who have property in the area of the wind farm who have put their (development) plans on hold. They are scared that they will not be able to enjoy their property with a wind farm in their backyard.&amp;quot; </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8931">
		<![CDATA[ PUGWASH - A proposed wind farm near here would hurt the area's well-established cottage industry, a real estate agent said Thursday.

&amp;quot;This is cottage country and on its own it is a major industry that has resulted in property values doubling several times over in recent years, but we will see property values drop 30 to 50 per cent as soon as this project is approved,&amp;quot; said Peter Finley.

&amp;quot;I've already seen buyers back away from deals and I know of people who have property in the area of the wind farm who have put their (development) plans on hold. They are scared that they will not be able to enjoy their property with a wind farm in their backyard.&amp;quot;  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm plan set for election issue</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8878" title="Wind farm plan set for election issue"/> 
	<id>.8878</id> 
	<updated>2007-04-10T12:18:36Z</updated> 
	<published>2007-04-10T12:18:36Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Candidates lining up for a crack at the Clwyd West Assembly seat are being urged to blow political hot air in the direction of a controversial renewable energy issue.

Llanrhaeadr yng Nghinmeirch county councillor Paul Marfleet is urging current Clwyd West AM Alun Pugh and prospective candidates to consider the concerns of Nantglyn residents over proposals for more wind turbines to be situated near the village.

Residents are concerned over plans for 29 new wind turbines around the village by two companies, Windpower Wales and Tegni Cymru Cyf. </summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/8878">
		<![CDATA[ Candidates lining up for a crack at the Clwyd West Assembly seat are being urged to blow political hot air in the direction of a controversial renewable energy issue.

Llanrhaeadr yng Nghinmeirch county councillor Paul Marfleet is urging current Clwyd West AM Alun Pugh and prospective candidates to consider the concerns of Nantglyn residents over proposals for more wind turbines to be situated near the village.

Residents are concerned over plans for 29 new wind turbines around the village by two companies, Windpower Wales and Tegni Cymru Cyf.  ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
