    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c112+38?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Bird Simulation</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9281</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:05:52 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9281</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Will turbines harm endangered bats?</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/24059</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:21:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Opponents to a proposed electricity-generating turbine project in Champaign County questioned Thursday during state hearings whether the wind-turbines would harm an endangered species of bat, but a researcher who studied the issue said the windmills would not. ...UNU attorneys argued the study did not follow specific guidelines for net placement developed by the department of fish and wildlife. A follow-up study by wildlife officials, however, did find evidence of the Indiana bat in the area.

Meinke said she had worked closely with officials from the department of fish and wildlife when she conducted the study, which was deemed adequate at the time.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Opponents to a proposed electricity-generating turbine project in Champaign County questioned Thursday during state hearings whether the wind-turbines would harm an endangered species of bat, but a researcher who studied the issue said the windmills would not. ...UNU attorneys argued the study did not follow specific guidelines for net placement developed by the department of fish and wildlife. A follow-up study by wildlife officials, however, did find evidence of the Indiana bat in the area.

Meinke said she had worked closely with officials from the department of fish and wildlife when she conducted the study, which was deemed adequate at the time.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/24059</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Supplemental impact statement in the works</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23891</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The US Forest Service is one step closer to issuing a decision on the Deerfield Wind Project. The Manchester Ranger District of the Green Mountain National Forest has reviewed the Public Service Board's approval and the public comments it received regarding last year's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Now the forest service is ready to release a supplemental report on their latest findings. But despite the new information, some state officials are urging the forest service take extra precautions before they make a final decision. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The US Forest Service is one step closer to issuing a decision on the Deerfield Wind Project. The Manchester Ranger District of the Green Mountain National Forest has reviewed the Public Service Board's approval and the public comments it received regarding last year's Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Now the forest service is ready to release a supplemental report on their latest findings. But despite the new information, some state officials are urging the forest service take extra precautions before they make a final decision.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23891</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm project gets mixed reaction</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23757</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:34:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The 39-turbine Roaring Brook wind farm project in the town of Martinsburg received little public comment Wednesday.

And the four people who did speak at the town Planning Board public hearing on the project expressed mixed opinions.

&quot;There is insufficient evidence to suggest that birds won't be displaced by Roaring Brook Wind Farm,&quot; said Chris K. Lajewski, the Northern New York land steward for the Nature Conservancy.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The 39-turbine Roaring Brook wind farm project in the town of Martinsburg received little public comment Wednesday.

And the four people who did speak at the town Planning Board public hearing on the project expressed mixed opinions.

&quot;There is insufficient evidence to suggest that birds won't be displaced by Roaring Brook Wind Farm,&quot; said Chris K. Lajewski, the Northern New York land steward for the Nature Conservancy.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23757</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind and wildlife: Panhandle power - More research needed on effect of wind turbines on ecosystems</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22591</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As the wind-energy industry continues to grow, state officials are developing guidelines to help wildlife and wind turbines coexist on the High Plains, a first step that may serve as a blueprint for the rest of Texas.

&quot;We're trying to get Panhandle-specific guidelines that would include the lesser-prairie chicken,&quot; said Kathy Boydston, program leader for wildlife habitat assessment at the state Parks &amp; Wildlife Department. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>As the wind-energy industry continues to grow, state officials are developing guidelines to help wildlife and wind turbines coexist on the High Plains, a first step that may serve as a blueprint for the rest of Texas.

&quot;We're trying to get Panhandle-specific guidelines that would include the lesser-prairie chicken,&quot; said Kathy Boydston, program leader for wildlife habitat assessment at the state Parks &amp; Wildlife Department. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22591</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Commissioners deny conditional use permit for wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22568</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Uinta County Commissioners voted unanimously to deny two conditional use permits that would have allowed an additional 120 wind turbines on Bridger Butte.

Bridger Butte Wind Power and Bridger Butte Wind Power II, being run by Tasco Engineering, wanted to add the turbines in the general area of Bigelow Road, and extending southward from the current project.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Uinta County Commissioners voted unanimously to deny two conditional use permits that would have allowed an additional 120 wind turbines on Bridger Butte.

Bridger Butte Wind Power and Bridger Butte Wind Power II, being run by Tasco Engineering, wanted to add the turbines in the general area of Bigelow Road, and extending southward from the current project.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22568</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>State to hear plans for new wind farm in Coos County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20301</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ On Monday New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee is going to begin evaluating a proposed renewable energy project for Coos county. 
Granite Reliable Power wants to put up 33 wind turbines on nine miles of ridgeline across Millsfield, Dixville and Dummer. 

The project would go a long way to increasing the state's renewable energy portfolio.

But as NHPR Correspondent Chris Jensen reports, it has a great deal of opposition.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>On Monday New Hampshire's Site Evaluation Committee is going to begin evaluating a proposed renewable energy project for Coos county. 
Granite Reliable Power wants to put up 33 wind turbines on nine miles of ridgeline across Millsfield, Dixville and Dummer. 

The project would go a long way to increasing the state's renewable energy portfolio.

But as NHPR Correspondent Chris Jensen reports, it has a great deal of opposition.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20301</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Coalition still hammering against Green Path North</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20181</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:03:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Miller, who is president of Friends of Big Morongo Canyon Preserve, told the attendees that Los Angeles citizens are opposing the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's Green Path project, especially as it could be a threat to Joshua Tree National Park.

One plan to foil the energy path is to legally declare Big Morongo Canyon Preserve as a protected wilderness attached to Joshua Tree National Park, where no power lines are allowed. That would disrupt the contiguous transmission towers in one Green Path North alternative proposed by the Los Angeles power company.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Miller, who is president of Friends of Big Morongo Canyon Preserve, told the attendees that Los Angeles citizens are opposing the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's Green Path project, especially as it could be a threat to Joshua Tree National Park.

One plan to foil the energy path is to legally declare Big Morongo Canyon Preserve as a protected wilderness attached to Joshua Tree National Park, where no power lines are allowed. That would disrupt the contiguous transmission towers in one Green Path North alternative proposed by the Los Angeles power company.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20181</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Don Quixote fights the windmills - and so do the folks in Boulevard</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19917</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Should wind turbines hundreds of feet tall -higher than the existing Kumeyaay wind farm turbines- be allowed in the rural McCain Valley/Boulevard region in East County? Does the nation's critical need for &quot;green&quot; energy outweigh the concerns of residents seeking to preserve the rural character of their backcountry communities? With new industrial-scale wind farms proposed across America, East County Magazine's Gayle Early set out on a quest to explore these issues in depth for our three-part series on wind energy. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Should wind turbines hundreds of feet tall -higher than the existing Kumeyaay wind farm turbines- be allowed in the rural McCain Valley/Boulevard region in East County? Does the nation's critical need for &quot;green&quot; energy outweigh the concerns of residents seeking to preserve the rural character of their backcountry communities? With new industrial-scale wind farms proposed across America, East County Magazine's Gayle Early set out on a quest to explore these issues in depth for our three-part series on wind energy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19917</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm opponents hire D.C. law firm; Activists continue to fight construction</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18306</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:16:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ With final approval of a siting permit less than a week away, anti-windfarm activists are firing yet another round of legal salvos in their bid to stop the construction of 124 wind turbines slated for north-central Greenbrier County.

State Public Service Commission hearings begin next Wednesday to determine if Beech Ridge Energy, owned by the Chicago-based company Invenergy, has complied with dozens of preconstruction terms that the PSC ordered when a conditional building permit was approved in 2007. ...Dave Buhrman said the Washington law firm Meyer Glitzenstein &amp; Crystal has been hired to sue Beech Ridge over potential violations of the Endangered Species Act if construction goes forward.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>With final approval of a siting permit less than a week away, anti-windfarm activists are firing yet another round of legal salvos in their bid to stop the construction of 124 wind turbines slated for north-central Greenbrier County.

State Public Service Commission hearings begin next Wednesday to determine if Beech Ridge Energy, owned by the Chicago-based company Invenergy, has complied with dozens of preconstruction terms that the PSC ordered when a conditional building permit was approved in 2007. ...Dave Buhrman said the Washington law firm Meyer Glitzenstein &amp; Crystal has been hired to sue Beech Ridge over potential violations of the Endangered Species Act if construction goes forward.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18306</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Maine eyed for hydro project </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18258</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:40:23 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wiscasset is being considered for the largest energy development proposal - and potentially the largest development project of any kind - in the history of the state.

A Toronto entrepreneur who has developed Canadian wind farms has floated the idea of building a massive $2 billion underground hydropower station at the old Maine Yankee nuclear power station site.

The project would be one of the first of its kind anywhere.

The proposal raises questions about impacts on the Back River and groundwater, and it would use as much energy as it creates.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wiscasset is being considered for the largest energy development proposal - and potentially the largest development project of any kind - in the history of the state.

A Toronto entrepreneur who has developed Canadian wind farms has floated the idea of building a massive $2 billion underground hydropower station at the old Maine Yankee nuclear power station site.

The project would be one of the first of its kind anywhere.

The proposal raises questions about impacts on the Back River and groundwater, and it would use as much energy as it creates.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18258</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Eastern Oregon attracting wind power development </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17329</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:18:12 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In Harney County, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the county have seen a jump in interest surrounding the windy Eastern Oregon ridges and peaks near Steens Mountain as wind development companies look for different sources of the renewable power to meet state standards. 

Harney County has already permitted one wind farm and is considering three more ...
But the wind farms that have either been approved or are under construction would add 2,400 megawatts to that total in the coming years, he said. 

&quot;Oregon in the next couple of years will move from around ninth in the country (for wind power production) to maybe third,&quot; Torres said. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>In Harney County, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the county have seen a jump in interest surrounding the windy Eastern Oregon ridges and peaks near Steens Mountain as wind development companies look for different sources of the renewable power to meet state standards. 

Harney County has already permitted one wind farm and is considering three more ...
But the wind farms that have either been approved or are under construction would add 2,400 megawatts to that total in the coming years, he said. 

&quot;Oregon in the next couple of years will move from around ninth in the country (for wind power production) to maybe third,&quot; Torres said. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17329</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Federal lawsuit against Kenedy County wind farms dismissed</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17265</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A federal judge in Austin dismissed a lawsuit that sought to prevent further construction of two Kenedy County wind farm projects.

The suit was filed in December by the Coastal Habitat Alliance, a nine-member environmental group that includes King Ranch, claiming the projects would cause irrevocable damage to the environment and birds. The alliance also filed a suit in state court that was dismissed earlier this year.

The wind farm projects, by Australian-based Babcock and Brown Ltd. and Oregon-based Iberdrola Renewables, formerly PPM Energy, continued with site preparation and initial construction and erection of wind turbines
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A federal judge in Austin dismissed a lawsuit that sought to prevent further construction of two Kenedy County wind farm projects.

The suit was filed in December by the Coastal Habitat Alliance, a nine-member environmental group that includes King Ranch, claiming the projects would cause irrevocable damage to the environment and birds. The alliance also filed a suit in state court that was dismissed earlier this year.

The wind farm projects, by Australian-based Babcock and Brown Ltd. and Oregon-based Iberdrola Renewables, formerly PPM Energy, continued with site preparation and initial construction and erection of wind turbines
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17265</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Study says turbines may affect wildlife</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16456</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Florida Power &amp; Light Co.'s proposal to put six wind turbines on company-owned property near the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant might affect several threatened species of wildlife, according to a recently released analysis by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

According to the findings, FPL's proposal would have &quot;a substantial adverse impact&quot; on federally managed fisheries in the south Atlantic region and wetlands, the report states. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Florida Power &amp; Light Co.'s proposal to put six wind turbines on company-owned property near the St. Lucie Nuclear Plant might affect several threatened species of wildlife, according to a recently released analysis by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

According to the findings, FPL's proposal would have &quot;a substantial adverse impact&quot; on federally managed fisheries in the south Atlantic region and wetlands, the report states. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16456</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm project could double in size</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16363</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ By year's end, developers expect to have about 250 huge wind turbines in place on Kenedy Ranch north of Raymondville, generating enough electricity to power approximately 90,000 homes.

And more could be on the way. ...In May, the alliance filed a court petition seeking to stop the development. The federal judge who heard the case has not yet made a decision.

The groups say that the ranch is on a major migratory pathway for birds, and they believe that tall, fast-spinning turbines on that pathway could lead to trouble.

&quot;We think there's a very high likelihood of catastrophic bird kills,&quot; said Elyse Yates, spokeswoman for the alliance.



 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>By year's end, developers expect to have about 250 huge wind turbines in place on Kenedy Ranch north of Raymondville, generating enough electricity to power approximately 90,000 homes.

And more could be on the way. ...In May, the alliance filed a court petition seeking to stop the development. The federal judge who heard the case has not yet made a decision.

The groups say that the ranch is on a major migratory pathway for birds, and they believe that tall, fast-spinning turbines on that pathway could lead to trouble.

&quot;We think there's a very high likelihood of catastrophic bird kills,&quot; said Elyse Yates, spokeswoman for the alliance.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16363</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine skeptics question effects on environment </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16142</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:43:49 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As Florida Power &amp; Light Co. gets closer to a public hearing on its wind turbine plan, skeptics of the project have plenty of questions left unanswered.

What about the effect on birds? Or sea turtles? And why put turbines in St. Lucie County in the first place? Nick Blount, external affairs manager for FPL on the Treasure Coast, tried to answer some of those questions from about 20 members of the St. Lucie County Conservation Alliance on Wednesday night and promised to try to find answers to others raised by residents.

&quot;I respect people's opinion about our wind project, but what I do want to do is tell our side of the story,&quot; Blount said. &quot;That's what we want.&quot;



 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>As Florida Power &amp; Light Co. gets closer to a public hearing on its wind turbine plan, skeptics of the project have plenty of questions left unanswered.

What about the effect on birds? Or sea turtles? And why put turbines in St. Lucie County in the first place? Nick Blount, external affairs manager for FPL on the Treasure Coast, tried to answer some of those questions from about 20 members of the St. Lucie County Conservation Alliance on Wednesday night and promised to try to find answers to others raised by residents.

&quot;I respect people's opinion about our wind project, but what I do want to do is tell our side of the story,&quot; Blount said. &quot;That's what we want.&quot;



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16142</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine sites aired for Galloo Island</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16178</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 02:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The state Department of Environmental Conservation on Wednesday released preliminary plans for the surveys and information required on the Galloo Island Wind Farm environmental impact statement.

The 36-page draft scoping statement includes plans for studies on the effects of the wind project on the land, Lake Ontario, public safety, archaeological resources, wetlands and wildlife. The plan does not include the effects on public roads or from noise and shadow flicker from the turbines, because the site is remote, the plan said. 

Interested parties have more than a month to file comments with the department before the scope of the impact statement is finalized.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The state Department of Environmental Conservation on Wednesday released preliminary plans for the surveys and information required on the Galloo Island Wind Farm environmental impact statement.

The 36-page draft scoping statement includes plans for studies on the effects of the wind project on the land, Lake Ontario, public safety, archaeological resources, wetlands and wildlife. The plan does not include the effects on public roads or from noise and shadow flicker from the turbines, because the site is remote, the plan said. 

Interested parties have more than a month to file comments with the department before the scope of the impact statement is finalized.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16178</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Concerns aired in wind energy forum</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15979</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Jim Congdon said two friends living in the town of Byron are experiencing significant sound problems and constant blade flicker since the $250 million Forward Wind Energy Center began operating.

&quot;It's extremely irritating,&quot; he said. &quot;What is the company going to do with somebody like that?&quot;

Laura Miner, asset manager associate for Chicago-based Invenergy Wind LLC, said it's currently fielding all complaints .

&quot;What we did when we built the project was to have a 1,000-foot setback and try to prevent some of those things from happening,&quot; she said. &quot;Now we're doing drive-by tests and going up to the houses to try to gauge what's going on.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Jim Congdon said two friends living in the town of Byron are experiencing significant sound problems and constant blade flicker since the $250 million Forward Wind Energy Center began operating.

&quot;It's extremely irritating,&quot; he said. &quot;What is the company going to do with somebody like that?&quot;

Laura Miner, asset manager associate for Chicago-based Invenergy Wind LLC, said it's currently fielding all complaints .

&quot;What we did when we built the project was to have a 1,000-foot setback and try to prevent some of those things from happening,&quot; she said. &quot;Now we're doing drive-by tests and going up to the houses to try to gauge what's going on.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15979</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Groups sue wind project to protect bats, birds</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15919</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 15:31:21 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Eleven citizen and environmental groups in West Virginia and Maryland have filed a 60-day notice about their intent to sue a wind power project.
They say the huge turbines from the NedPower Mount Storm project would kill endangered bats and squirrels near the Dolly Sods Wilderness Area. 

The groups also will sue corporate owners Dominion Resources and Shell Wind Energy for violating the Endangered Species Act, according to Judy Rodd, director of Friends of Blackwater Canyon, based in Charleston. ...Landowners who live near the project also have filed a nuisance suit against NedPower citing concerns about their health and safety, as well as reductions in their property values. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Eleven citizen and environmental groups in West Virginia and Maryland have filed a 60-day notice about their intent to sue a wind power project.
They say the huge turbines from the NedPower Mount Storm project would kill endangered bats and squirrels near the Dolly Sods Wilderness Area. 

The groups also will sue corporate owners Dominion Resources and Shell Wind Energy for violating the Endangered Species Act, according to Judy Rodd, director of Friends of Blackwater Canyon, based in Charleston. ...Landowners who live near the project also have filed a nuisance suit against NedPower citing concerns about their health and safety, as well as reductions in their property values. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15919</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Opposition high for projects</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15899</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:16:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Nearly all of some 175 landowners raised their hands during a meeting here Friday when a West Texas lawmaker asked how many wanted legislators to oppose billionaire T. Boone Pickens' efforts to obtain rights of way for water pipeline and electricity transmission lines.

The lines would also pass through parts of Archer, Hardeman, Jack, Wichita and Wilbarger counties. A similar meeting has been scheduled Thursday in Holliday.

One landowner shouted &quot;Do it,&quot; during the show of hands urging lawmakers fight Pickens' attempts to obtain rights of way to build the world's largest wind farm and to ship water from the Panhandle to thirsty areas downstate.

No one - not even Pickens' representatives - raised their hands when state Sen. Bob Duncan asked who wanted lawmakers to support the projects.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Nearly all of some 175 landowners raised their hands during a meeting here Friday when a West Texas lawmaker asked how many wanted legislators to oppose billionaire T. Boone Pickens' efforts to obtain rights of way for water pipeline and electricity transmission lines.

The lines would also pass through parts of Archer, Hardeman, Jack, Wichita and Wilbarger counties. A similar meeting has been scheduled Thursday in Holliday.

One landowner shouted &quot;Do it,&quot; during the show of hands urging lawmakers fight Pickens' attempts to obtain rights of way to build the world's largest wind farm and to ship water from the Panhandle to thirsty areas downstate.

No one - not even Pickens' representatives - raised their hands when state Sen. Bob Duncan asked who wanted lawmakers to support the projects.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15899</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
