    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c112+116?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Waymart wind facility topography, Wayne County, PA</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/12992</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/12992</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Pawnee Buttes</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/10340</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind turbines from the Cedar Creek Wind Energy Project are seen across the horizon behind one of the Pawnee Buttes. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind turbines from the Cedar Creek Wind Energy Project are seen across the horizon behind one of the Pawnee Buttes. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/10340</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Lower Austria/Burgenland</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/11023</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ East of Vienna near the Hungarian border ]]></content:encoded>
<description>East of Vienna near the Hungarian border</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/11023</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Uncluttered Landscape</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/9165</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:08:51 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Workers build a new powerline in southwest Minnesota to take energy from wind turbines into the national grid. Utility companies are planning hundreds of miles of new lines.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Workers build a new powerline in southwest Minnesota to take energy from wind turbines into the national grid. Utility companies are planning hundreds of miles of new lines. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/9165</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Manawatu</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/8449</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Maori have attacked plans for more wind turbines in the Tararua Ranges, saying turbines are weakening the mauri (life force) and mana of the hill tops. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Maori have attacked plans for more wind turbines in the Tararua Ranges, saying turbines are weakening the mauri (life force) and mana of the hill tops. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/8449</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Mojave Desert</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/8209</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Some environmentalists oppose wind farms, such as this one in the Mojave Desert in California, because they consider the projects to be eyesores planted on near-pristine landscapes.  
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Some environmentalists oppose wind farms, such as this one in the Mojave Desert in California, because they consider the projects to be eyesores planted on near-pristine landscapes.  
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/8209</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Bear Creek: Post Construction</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7895</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7895</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7333</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7333</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Mars Hill Construction- Turbine #9</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/5919</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ We believe this is a photo of Turbine #9 taken from the north looking south. <br>

The FAA's 7460-1 database appears to corroborate that assumption - see: <br>https://www.oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaaEXT/searchAction.jsp?action=displayOECase&amp;oeCaseID=454417 .  <br>
Dan Boone has made of map of the locations of the Mars Hill turbines. It is available via the following link:<br>
http://www.windaction.org/pictures/6552
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>We believe this is a photo of Turbine #9 taken from the north looking south. 

The FAA's 7460-1 database appears to corroborate that assumption - see: https://www.oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaaEXT/searchAction.jsp?action=displayOECase&amp;oeCaseID=454417 .  
Dan Boone has made of map of the locations of the Mars Hill turbines. It is available via the following link:
http://www.windaction.org/pictures/6552
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/5919</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Shetland Simulation</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4822</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ ISLANDERS in Shetland will have the chance for the first time this weekend to see how a 600MW windfarm would affect the isles' landscape.



Ever since the massive project was first mooted almost three years ago, public debate has been slow to get started.

Today (Saturday 9/2/06) managers behind the Viking Energy project will exhibit computer generated images at the Shetland Showcase Exhibition, in the Lerwick Clickimin Centre.

A comprehensive consultation website at www.vikingenergy.co.uk, designed to interact with the public, is also to go live at the weekend.

The project has already been branded as far too big for Shetland by one local environmental campaigner.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>ISLANDERS in Shetland will have the chance for the first time this weekend to see how a 600MW windfarm would affect the isles' landscape.



Ever since the massive project was first mooted almost three years ago, public debate has been slow to get started.

Today (Saturday 9/2/06) managers behind the Viking Energy project will exhibit computer generated images at the Shetland Showcase Exhibition, in the Lerwick Clickimin Centre.

A comprehensive consultation website at www.vikingenergy.co.uk, designed to interact with the public, is also to go live at the weekend.

The project has already been branded as far too big for Shetland by one local environmental campaigner.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4822</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Elk River (KS) After</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4255</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:16:55 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4255</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>South Pointe, Hawaii: Abandoned Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4147</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:42:32 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The South Pointe wind plant was built in 1986 and later abandoned ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The South Pointe wind plant was built in 1986 and later abandoned</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4147</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>South Pointe, Hawaii: Abandoned Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4146</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The South Pointe wind plant  was built in 1986 and later abandoned ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The South Pointe wind plant  was built in 1986 and later abandoned</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4146</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>South Pointe, Hawaii: Abandoned Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4145</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The South Pointe wind plant was built in 1986 and later abandoned ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The South Pointe wind plant was built in 1986 and later abandoned</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4145</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>South Pointe, Hawaii: Abandoned Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/4144</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The South Pointe wind plant was built in 1986 and later abandoned.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The South Pointe wind plant was built in 1986 and later abandoned. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/4144</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Mojave Wind Plant</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2628</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Norbert Woerns recently took this photo of the Mojave Wind installation as he was driving down a freeway in Southern California toward the Joshua Tree National Park. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Norbert Woerns recently took this photo of the Mojave Wind installation as he was driving down a freeway in Southern California toward the Joshua Tree National Park. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2628</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Bradwell on Sea - Simulation</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2540</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:56:18 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A Gale of protest is forming on the Dengie Marshes</p>


If you were in any doubt about the pros and cons of building ten wind turbines at Bradwell on Sea, perhaps the photograph below will help you decide. This is the impact just ten such turbines will have on the tranquillity of the area, there could be as many as thirty nine in the adjacent country side if construction is approved.</p>

The photograph, taken from St. Nicholas Church, Tillingham, depicts the view across the Bradwell marshes alongside St. Peter’s Way where the Wind Farm is to be sited. The turbines have been superimposed and are accurately portrayed in both scale and position.</p>

The machines will totally dominate the landscape for four or five miles around, will be visible up to twenty miles away and will seriously affect the ambience and spirituality of St. Peter’s on the Wall which is the oldest church of its type in the world.</p>

The scale and environmental impact of this industrial development in a rural and tranquil area will be enormous. The resulting electricity produced is minimal and expensive; the Carbon Dioxide emission savings are insignificant on a UK scale and too small to measure on a world scale.</p>


Maldon District Council advises that should you want to make representation about this proposal then quote Application No. FUL/MAL/06/00291 and write to The Chief Planning Officer, Council Offices, Princes Road, Maldon, CM9 5DL or email to dc.planning@maldon.gov.uk.&lt;/p.

Neil Yates 
On behalf of 900 plus BATTLE members. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A Gale of protest is forming on the Dengie Marshes


If you were in any doubt about the pros and cons of building ten wind turbines at Bradwell on Sea, perhaps the photograph below will help you decide. This is the impact just ten such turbines will have on the tranquillity of the area, there could be as many as thirty nine in the adjacent country side if construction is approved.

The photograph, taken from St. Nicholas Church, Tillingham, depicts the view across the Bradwell marshes alongside St. Peter’s Way where the Wind Farm is to be sited. The turbines have been superimposed and are accurately portrayed in both scale and position.

The machines will totally dominate the landscape for four or five miles around, will be visible up to twenty miles away and will seriously affect the ambience and spirituality of St. Peter’s on the Wall which is the oldest church of its type in the world.

The scale and environmental impact of this industrial development in a rural and tranquil area will be enormous. The resulting electricity produced is minimal and expensive; the Carbon Dioxide emission savings are insignificant on a UK scale and too small to measure on a world scale.


Maldon District Council advises that should you want to make representation about this proposal then quote Application No. FUL/MAL/06/00291 and write to The Chief Planning Officer, Council Offices, Princes Road, Maldon, CM9 5DL or email to dc.planning@maldon.gov.uk.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2540</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind developer faces legal setback</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23518</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An environmental court judge has dealt a setback to a wind energy developer that wants to build a project in the Northeast Kingdom. 

The judge has set a trial for December to hear arguments about whether the project complies with Vermont's water quality regulations. Parts of Judge Merideth Wright's ruling went in favor of First Wind, the company that wants to put the 16 turbines on a ridgeline in Sheffield. But when the judge focused on how the project will affect the water quality of high elevation streams, she handed the opponents a victory. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>An environmental court judge has dealt a setback to a wind energy developer that wants to build a project in the Northeast Kingdom. 

The judge has set a trial for December to hear arguments about whether the project complies with Vermont's water quality regulations. Parts of Judge Merideth Wright's ruling went in favor of First Wind, the company that wants to put the 16 turbines on a ridgeline in Sheffield. But when the judge focused on how the project will affect the water quality of high elevation streams, she handed the opponents a victory. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23518</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind event draws crowd </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23411</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ With the very audible rapid whirring of two ceiling fans overhead a constant reminder of the issue, about 500 people jammed into the centre to learn more about proposed industrial wind turbines in the area. 

Ward 16 Coun. David Marsh told the audience he was holding the town hall meeting as a means to get clarification from the private company Energy Farming Ontario about its intention to build up to 30 of the turbines. He also raised concern that the provincial government's new Green Energy Act ...removes residents' and the city's right to appeal the towers going in to their neighbourhoods. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>With the very audible rapid whirring of two ceiling fans overhead a constant reminder of the issue, about 500 people jammed into the centre to learn more about proposed industrial wind turbines in the area. 

Ward 16 Coun. David Marsh told the audience he was holding the town hall meeting as a means to get clarification from the private company Energy Farming Ontario about its intention to build up to 30 of the turbines. He also raised concern that the provincial government's new Green Energy Act ...removes residents' and the city's right to appeal the towers going in to their neighbourhoods. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23411</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>APA approves two residential windmills</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22706</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Adirondack Park Agency commissioners approved two residential wind turbines at their recent meeting: one in Essex, the other in Indian Lake.

In discussion, APA commissioners considered refining their use of &quot;substantial invisibility&quot; as it applies to slender, residential wind turbines, which disappear to the naked eye a mile away.

Commissioner Richard Booth suggested APA Tower's Policy may not be a good regulatory fit for accessory, homeowner wind turbines.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Adirondack Park Agency commissioners approved two residential wind turbines at their recent meeting: one in Essex, the other in Indian Lake.

In discussion, APA commissioners considered refining their use of &quot;substantial invisibility&quot; as it applies to slender, residential wind turbines, which disappear to the naked eye a mile away.

Commissioner Richard Booth suggested APA Tower's Policy may not be a good regulatory fit for accessory, homeowner wind turbines.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22706</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
