Category:
USA and West Virginia
Browse in :
All
> Location
> USA
(1910)
All > Location > USA > West Virginia (412)
Any of these categories
All > Location > USA > West Virginia (412)
Any of these categories
Environmentalists divided over wind farm, endangered bats
October 21, 2009 by Maria Glod in Washington Post
October 21, 2009 by Maria Glod in Washington Post
Workers atop mountain ridges are putting together 389-foot windmills with massive blades that will turn Appalachian breezes into energy. Retiree David Cowan is fighting to stop them.
Because of the bats. ...It is the first court challenge to wind power under the Endangered Species Act, lawyers on both sides say. With President Obama's goal of doubling renewable energy production by 2012, wind and solar farms are rapidly expanding. As they do, battles are being waged to reach the right balance between the benefits of clean energy and the impact on birds, bats and even the water supply.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Bats]
A proposed West Virginia wind power project will harm a tiny, endangered bat and its developers should be should be required to obtain permits under the Endangered Species Act, attorneys for two environmental groups argued Wednesday in federal court.
The developers admit bats will be killed by the turbines, but refuse to acknowledge the endangered Indiana bat will be among them, plaintiffs attorney Eric Glitzenstein argued in his opening statements.
A U.S. congressman has added his voice to those who seek to protect Camp Allegheny, the Civil War battlefield now considered endangered by the industrial wind energy utility under construction nearby.
Congressman Nick J. Rahall II (D-3rd District) of Beckley represents 17 counties in West Virginia, including Pocahontas County, where the battleground lies.
Also filed under [
Impact on Landscape|
Virginia]
Environmental and animal rights groups want to stop further construction on a West Virginia wind farm, citing potential harm to the endangered Indiana bat.
The Animal Welfare Institute and Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy filed a motion for a preliminary injunction Friday in U.S. District Court in Maryland.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife]
More rules needed for wind power, study concludes
May 4, 2007 by Ken Ward Jr. in The Charleston Gazette
May 4, 2007 by Ken Ward Jr. in The Charleston Gazette
Appalachian states lack strong and detailed guidelines to regulate the continued growth of wind power facilities along the Mid-Atlantic highlands, according to a new study by the National Academy of Sciences.
A team of academy experts concluded that wind power can help offset the greenhouse emissions caused by coal and other fossil-fuel energy sources, but the projected growth of wind power in West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania creates potential threats to bird and bat populations that are not fully understood, the academy study found.
Windmill "farms" also can cause other environmental problems and create legitimate aesthetic concerns for local communities - ranging from damage to scenic vistas to noise and "shadow flicker," a strobe-like effect created by rotating turbines, the report found.
"The United States is in the early stages of learning how to plan for and regulate wind-energy facilities," says the report, compiled by the National Academy's National Research Council.
The report said the cumulative effects of continued growth in wind power are unclear, and that further study is needed.
Rep. Alan B. Mollohan, D-W.Va., told a House committee Tuesday about the dangers wind turbines in West Virginia and elsewhere pose to birds and bats.
"In the past, West Virginia's natural resources were exploited without regard to the long-term environmental consequences, and I think it's imperative that this not be allowed to happen again," Mollohan told the House Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans during Tuesday's hearing, the first congressional hearing on the impact of huge wind turbines on wildlife.
Mollohan also spoke about the size of the wind projects on West Virginia's mountain ridges.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
Congress urged to study effects of wind power on bats, birds
May 2, 2007 by Tara Copp in American-Statesman
May 2, 2007 by Tara Copp in American-Statesman
WASHINGTON - An unusual coalition of conservationists and coal advocates told Congress on Tuesday that before the nation continues its rapid expansion of wind power, an assessment is needed of how many bats and birds are maimed and killed by wind turbines' blades.
That study should be followed up with regulations to protect those species, witnesses told a House Natural Resources subcommittee.
West Virginia governor backs idea of guaranteed price floors for oil
September 17, 2006 by Peter Gartrell in The News Record
September 17, 2006 by Peter Gartrell in The News Record
But Manchin's proposal went a step beyond talk and ideas, setting out a concrete way to begin attracting more money to development of ethanol, biodiesel, solar, wind or biomass electricity generation.
“I've always been told the $35, $40 range (per barrel of oil) is where alternative fuels become viable” Manchin told The News-Record after a tour of Arch Coal's Black Thunder mine. “Let's find that benchmark ... I don't see another way.”
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
Wyoming]
Details and a registration form are available at the link below for the Wildlife and Wind Energy Conference to be held on Saturday, December 2, 2006 at Kutztown University in Kutztown, PA USA.
Peltz sees windmills as “a small piece of the puzzle,” with the major roles in the energy drama occupied by oil and coal.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
A group of Grant County landowners has filed a lawsuit seeking to block construction of a Mount Storm area wind-power project.
Wind energy committee gathers on Wednesday
December 8, 2005 by Anne Adams • Staff Writer in The Recorder (VA)
December 8, 2005 by Anne Adams • Staff Writer in The Recorder (VA)
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Virginia Highlanders following the debate on the impacts of commercial wind turbine projects may want to head next door to West Virginia next Wednesday.
Also filed under [
Energy Policy|
Virginia]
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder," Dave Groberg, project developer for Invenergy Wind LLC told 60 members of Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy (MCRE) Tuesday at Williamsburg’s community center. "While many people find wind turbines graceful and attractive, others disagree." He was referring to the 131 wind turbines his Chicago-based company hopes to erect on the mountain ridges of northwestern Greenbrier County.
Also filed under [
General|
Energy Policy]
Grant residents sue to block wind turbine project
November 30, 2005 by Ken Ward Jr., Staff writer in The Charleston Gazette
November 30, 2005 by Ken Ward Jr., Staff writer in The Charleston Gazette
Seven Grant County residents have filed suit to try to block construction of 200 giant wind turbines proposed near their homes.
Jerome E. Burch and six other residents sued developers of the $150 million Mount Storm wind project.
In their 14-page complaint, the residents allege that the NedPower Mount Storm LLC project will be a “nuisance” and “an eyesore” that creates excess noise and kills birds and bats.
The suit also alleges that the project will generate little power but receive lucrative federal and state tax breaks.
Residents speak out against wind farm
November 23, 2005 by Eric Eyre, Staff Writer in West Virginia Gazette
November 23, 2005 by Eric Eyre, Staff Writer in West Virginia Gazette
More than 700 Greenbrier County residents have sent letters to the state Public Service Commission, opposing a plan to build one of the largest wind-power projects east of the Mississippi River.
The residents say the wind turbines will spoil mountain views, decrease property values, kill bats and birds, hurt tourism and ruin hunting and fishing in the area. They predict the wind turbines will catch fire during lightning strikes. And they say the turbines will interfere with emergency radio communications.
Citizens Sue Norton for Wildlife Death Information
November 16, 2004 by Friends of Blackwater et al in Press Release
November 16, 2004 by Friends of Blackwater et al in Press Release
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife]
Animal Welfare Institute et.al. motion for preliminary injunction against the Beech Ridge wind energy facility
July 10, 2009
by Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal
The Animal Welfare Institute, Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy and David G. Cowan have filed a law suit against Beech Ridge Energy LLC and Invenergy Wind LLC under the federal Endangered Species Act ("ESA"). This filing seeks preliminary injunction to halt further construction, turbine erection, and operation of the Beech Ridge industrial wind power project. The plaintiffs argue that the project, if constructed, will result in the "likely killing, injury, and other forms of "take" of endangered Indiana bats in violation of the ESA." The wind project is proposed to be located on ridgelines in Greenbrier County, West Virginia.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Bats]
The Nature Conservancy released a report last month, "Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America."
The conservancy pointed out that wind, solar and renewable energy sources require far more land than nuclear energy and coal. ...The term "energy sprawl" accurately describes the multiple trade-offs that face the nation. The American people need to think through what they are being urged to do.
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape]
Also filed under [
Energy Policy]
I had always favored building wind farms. The burden of coal mining-and particularly mountaintop removal coal mining-is so great that anything would be better. If wind farms diminish that then they are worth it. ...Now there is a new twist to the argument, something that makes thinking about wind power even more difficult. In the article that begins on page 14 of this issue, Ms. Collins argues that building more wind farms will not reduce the use of coal. She argues that because wind farms only make electricity when the wind blows, they are inefficient and unreliable. ...If it true that wind farms do not diminish the use of coal, then we do have some rethinking to do. If they do not replace any coal, then what is the point? Why should a single bat die, a single hiker be inconvenienced, a single tree be cut if wind power is not going to reduce the use of coal or some other source of electricity?
Also filed under [
Impact on Wildlife|
Impact on Landscape]
- Options :
- View Archives