    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c109+122?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Critics sound off on wind farm plan</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23953</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:34:32 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ [Walter] Wiersma, of Friesland, was one of many people at the standing-room-only hearing who said worries about the health effects, safety and noise from wind turbines in a 17,300-acre area of the towns of Scott and Randolph, should lead the commission to reject the We Energies proposal for Glacier Hills Wind Park. &quot;I'm for green energy,&quot; he said, &quot;but I don't want it to hurt my family and friends.&quot;

The afternoon and evening sessions for the hearing were moved from the Randolph Town Hall to the Friesland Village Hall to accommodate more people.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>[Walter] Wiersma, of Friesland, was one of many people at the standing-room-only hearing who said worries about the health effects, safety and noise from wind turbines in a 17,300-acre area of the towns of Scott and Randolph, should lead the commission to reject the We Energies proposal for Glacier Hills Wind Park. &quot;I'm for green energy,&quot; he said, &quot;but I don't want it to hurt my family and friends.&quot;

The afternoon and evening sessions for the hearing were moved from the Randolph Town Hall to the Friesland Village Hall to accommodate more people.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23953</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Towns plan for new wind siting law </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23447</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Officials in Union and Magnolia townships consider moratoriums on wind turbines to be the temporary answer in response to a new state law. 
Wind developer EcoEnergy has proposed projects in both communities. 

Local residents are concerned the new process on siting wind energy systems signed into law this week will erase their work to protect themselves from negative effects. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Officials in Union and Magnolia townships consider moratoriums on wind turbines to be the temporary answer in response to a new state law. 
Wind developer EcoEnergy has proposed projects in both communities. 

Local residents are concerned the new process on siting wind energy systems signed into law this week will erase their work to protect themselves from negative effects. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23447</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Questions emerge over how, where to place wind farms</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23111</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  How close would you want to live to a wind farm? That's a question lawmakers are considering as they try to create more wind energy projects.
State Senators are scheduled Tuesday to vote on a bill (SB 185), which would direct the Public Service Commission to set a statewide set of standards on where turbines could be sited in relation to homes and businesses.

As of now, depending on the county, those tall spinning turbines can as be close as 500 feet from homes, or as far away as one mile.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description> How close would you want to live to a wind farm? That's a question lawmakers are considering as they try to create more wind energy projects.
State Senators are scheduled Tuesday to vote on a bill (SB 185), which would direct the Public Service Commission to set a statewide set of standards on where turbines could be sited in relation to homes and businesses.

As of now, depending on the county, those tall spinning turbines can as be close as 500 feet from homes, or as far away as one mile.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23111</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wisconsin wind farm siting legislation accounts for neighbors</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22538</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:16:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A state senate panel has advanced a bill that would create a statewide standard for siting wind farms in Wisconsin. But senators changed the plan to add protections for people who live near the massive wind turbines. ...under a provision passed by a senate panel, the PSC would have to consider the health effects of wind turbines when they decide how far to set them back from homes. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A state senate panel has advanced a bill that would create a statewide standard for siting wind farms in Wisconsin. But senators changed the plan to add protections for people who live near the massive wind turbines. ...under a provision passed by a senate panel, the PSC would have to consider the health effects of wind turbines when they decide how far to set them back from homes. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22538</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Calumet County sets wind turbine moratorium after Supreme Court decision</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22270</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind turbine construction is off the table in Calumet County for the time being as supervisors regroup from a court decision that invalidated their restrictions on placement of the systems.

The Calumet County Board passed a moratorium on turbine construction Tuesday that could remain in effect until the end of the year. It could end earlier should the board change or replace the ordinance.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind turbine construction is off the table in Calumet County for the time being as supervisors regroup from a court decision that invalidated their restrictions on placement of the systems.

The Calumet County Board passed a moratorium on turbine construction Tuesday that could remain in effect until the end of the year. It could end earlier should the board change or replace the ordinance.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22270</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ruling reopens wind energy debate in Calumet County; Court voids Calumet's wind turbine policy</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22219</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A wind energy debate that's turned neighbor against neighbor in Calumet County took a new turn last week through 13 pages prepared by a three-judge panel.

A county ordinance that regulated wind turbines is no longer valid, according the state Court of Appeals.

Officials said it's too early to tell what the decision will mean to the future of wind energy in Calumet County.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A wind energy debate that's turned neighbor against neighbor in Calumet County took a new turn last week through 13 pages prepared by a three-judge panel.

A county ordinance that regulated wind turbines is no longer valid, according the state Court of Appeals.

Officials said it's too early to tell what the decision will mean to the future of wind energy in Calumet County.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22219</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wisconsin court limits local wind turbine regulations</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22136</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A Wisconsin appeals court is limiting the restrictions that local municipalities can place on the installation of wind turbines.

The District 2 Court of Appeals says state law promotes alternative energy sources such as wind energy and discourages local policies that arbitrarily limit them.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A Wisconsin appeals court is limiting the restrictions that local municipalities can place on the installation of wind turbines.

The District 2 Court of Appeals says state law promotes alternative energy sources such as wind energy and discourages local policies that arbitrarily limit them.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22136</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wis. court tosses local wind turbine regulations </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22150</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A Wisconsin appeals court on Wednesday effectively struck down numerous municipal ordinances that have slowed the development of wind energy, lawyers said.

Local governments cannot pass broad rules dictating how far wind turbines must be from other buildings, how tall they can be or how much noise they can produce, the Waukesha-based District 2 Court of Appeals ruled.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A Wisconsin appeals court on Wednesday effectively struck down numerous municipal ordinances that have slowed the development of wind energy, lawyers said.

Local governments cannot pass broad rules dictating how far wind turbines must be from other buildings, how tall they can be or how much noise they can produce, the Waukesha-based District 2 Court of Appeals ruled.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22150</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wisconsin regulators to consider plans for wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21988</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ State regulators plan to vote today on a Wisconsin utility's plans to build a massive wind farm in southern Minnesota.

Wisconsin Power &amp; Light Co., a subsidiary of Madison-based Alliant Energy, wants permission to start the first phase of the farm on 32,500 acres just north of Albert Lea in Freeborn County. Plans call for scores of turbines that would generate about 200 megawatts of electricity. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>State regulators plan to vote today on a Wisconsin utility's plans to build a massive wind farm in southern Minnesota.

Wisconsin Power &amp; Light Co., a subsidiary of Madison-based Alliant Energy, wants permission to start the first phase of the farm on 32,500 acres just north of Albert Lea in Freeborn County. Plans call for scores of turbines that would generate about 200 megawatts of electricity.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21988</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Group wants changes to wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/22018</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The bent tree wind farm project has been in the works since 2003.

Now the Wisconsin Power and Light Utility Company is looking to secure a permit in Minnesota to begin construction on the project.

But not everybody is happy.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The bent tree wind farm project has been in the works since 2003.

Now the Wisconsin Power and Light Utility Company is looking to secure a permit in Minnesota to begin construction on the project.

But not everybody is happy.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/22018</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Minnesota wind farm prompts Wisconsin vote</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21979</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ State regulators plan to vote Thursday on a Wisconsin utility's plans to build a massive wind farm in southern Minnesota.

Wisconsin Power &amp; Light Co., a subsidiary of Madison-based Alliant Energy, wants permission to start the first phase of the farm on 32,500 acres just north of Albert Lea in Freeborn County. Plans call for scores of turbines that would generate about 200 megawatts of electricity.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>State regulators plan to vote Thursday on a Wisconsin utility's plans to build a massive wind farm in southern Minnesota.

Wisconsin Power &amp; Light Co., a subsidiary of Madison-based Alliant Energy, wants permission to start the first phase of the farm on 32,500 acres just north of Albert Lea in Freeborn County. Plans call for scores of turbines that would generate about 200 megawatts of electricity.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21979</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Legal wrangling erupts over wind development </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21976</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:27:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ More local disputes over siting of wind turbines are headed for the courts. The legal fights are popping up, as state lawmakers debate a statewide siting bill. 
Some people in Trempealeau County are the latest to file a complaint alleging a county law on wind turbine siting is too restrictive.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>More local disputes over siting of wind turbines are headed for the courts. The legal fights are popping up, as state lawmakers debate a statewide siting bill. 
Some people in Trempealeau County are the latest to file a complaint alleging a county law on wind turbine siting is too restrictive.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21976</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Officials urge state wind rules</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21943</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wisconsin Rapids officials are working to create a policy regulating small wind-energy systems but want legislators in Madison to create a statewide law for consistency.

With a planned 350,000-square-foot plant expected to produce large, industrial wind turbine blades, the city currently has no rules regulating smaller, more residential wind mills, Mayor Mary Jo Carson said.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wisconsin Rapids officials are working to create a policy regulating small wind-energy systems but want legislators in Madison to create a statewide law for consistency.

With a planned 350,000-square-foot plant expected to produce large, industrial wind turbine blades, the city currently has no rules regulating smaller, more residential wind mills, Mayor Mary Jo Carson said.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21943</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Menomonee Falls looks at establishing standards for wind turbines </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21818</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:43:56 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ As the state pushes for more wind energy and fewer local restrictions, Menomonee Falls is one of the first communities in southeastern Wisconsin to tackle the issue, trying to strike a compromise between small windmills and commercial farms.

Village employees began researching the issue after a local resident expressed interest in installing a small wind turbine in his yard to reduce energy costs.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>As the state pushes for more wind energy and fewer local restrictions, Menomonee Falls is one of the first communities in southeastern Wisconsin to tackle the issue, trying to strike a compromise between small windmills and commercial farms.

Village employees began researching the issue after a local resident expressed interest in installing a small wind turbine in his yard to reduce energy costs.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21818</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Residents and officials clash over wind-farm standards </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/21597</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A bill that would help determine where wind farms can be built in Wisconsin is sparking debate among people in Monroe County. 
Retired farmer Fernnell Becher says it's been an ongoing debate for years. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A bill that would help determine where wind farms can be built in Wisconsin is sparking debate among people in Monroe County. 
Retired farmer Fernnell Becher says it's been an ongoing debate for years. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/21597</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Local residents concerned wind bill would wipe out their work</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/20804</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:09:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Tom Alisankus' blood pressure rises when discussion turns to a proposed bill to regulate wind energy.
The issue angers him, he said, because the proposed state regulations would remove local control, wiping out months of work by a study committee he chaired to write an local ordinance regulating wind energy in Union Township.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Tom Alisankus' blood pressure rises when discussion turns to a proposed bill to regulate wind energy.
The issue angers him, he said, because the proposed state regulations would remove local control, wiping out months of work by a study committee he chaired to write an local ordinance regulating wind energy in Union Township.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/20804</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Manitowoc says no to wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19621</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Manitowoc County Board of Adjustment rejected earlier this week a developer's request for approval to build a seven-turbine wind project west of Two Rivers.

The decision marks the latest setback in the project developer's four-year-long quest to erect a community-scale wind project in the Town of Mishicot, according to a press release from Renew Wisconsin. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Manitowoc County Board of Adjustment rejected earlier this week a developer's request for approval to build a seven-turbine wind project west of Two Rivers.

The decision marks the latest setback in the project developer's four-year-long quest to erect a community-scale wind project in the Town of Mishicot, according to a press release from Renew Wisconsin. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19621</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>County takes public comment on wind farm ordinance</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19349</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:12:31 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An ordinance created to guide wind energy development in Douglas County gets a public hearing Tuesday in the Government Center.
The purpose of the ordinance is to provide a regulatory scheme for the placement, construction and operation of wind energy facilities in Douglas County to preserve the public health and safety.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>An ordinance created to guide wind energy development in Douglas County gets a public hearing Tuesday in the Government Center.
The purpose of the ordinance is to provide a regulatory scheme for the placement, construction and operation of wind energy facilities in Douglas County to preserve the public health and safety.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19349</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Judge upholds towns' vetoes of wind permits</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19093</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Plans of a Chicago-based wind developer to erect over 60 wind turbines in the area may have been derailed by a ruling in Monroe County Circuit Court last week.

In a decision released Wednesday, Judge Michael McAlpine upheld the actions of the towns of Wilton and Ridgeville, which vetoed conditional use permits (CUPs) issued to the wind developer. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Plans of a Chicago-based wind developer to erect over 60 wind turbines in the area may have been derailed by a ruling in Monroe County Circuit Court last week.

In a decision released Wednesday, Judge Michael McAlpine upheld the actions of the towns of Wilton and Ridgeville, which vetoed conditional use permits (CUPs) issued to the wind developer. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19093</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Local laws leave wind farms out to pasture</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18881</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Lawmakers will rally again for statewide regulations on wind farm development in the upcoming legislative session, and, if the standards pass, local regulation could be a thing of the past.

&quot;We will push for the (Public Service Commission of Wisconsin) to create uniform standards and regulation of wind energy for all projects,&quot; said Curt Pawlisch, an attorney with Cullen Weston Pines &amp; Bach LLP, Madison. Pawlisch is revising wind farm standards that failed to get out of legislative committees last session. 

&quot;I wouldn't say local regulations would be for naught,&quot; he said, &quot;but the PSC would determine what works and what doesn't.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Lawmakers will rally again for statewide regulations on wind farm development in the upcoming legislative session, and, if the standards pass, local regulation could be a thing of the past.

&quot;We will push for the (Public Service Commission of Wisconsin) to create uniform standards and regulation of wind energy for all projects,&quot; said Curt Pawlisch, an attorney with Cullen Weston Pines &amp; Bach LLP, Madison. Pawlisch is revising wind farm standards that failed to get out of legislative committees last session. 

&quot;I wouldn't say local regulations would be for naught,&quot; he said, &quot;but the PSC would determine what works and what doesn't.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18881</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
