    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c108+46?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Commission: Deny wind power project - Horizon Wind Energy project now goes to county commissioners for review of recommendation</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/1446</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Kittitas County Planning Commission on Monday voted 5-0 to recommend denial of the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project proposed for 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Kittitas County Planning Commission on Monday voted 5-0 to recommend denial of the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project proposed for 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/1446</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm opponents speak out</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/1275</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:28:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Opponents of the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project dominated Wednesday’s second hearing on the wind farm proposed for 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg. They said the damage to scenic views from the wind turbines can’t be lessened and will reduce property values.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Opponents of the Kittitas Valley Wind Power Project dominated Wednesday’s second hearing on the wind farm proposed for 12 miles northwest of Ellensburg. They said the damage to scenic views from the wind turbines can’t be lessened and will reduce property values.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/1275</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm makes its case for approval - Some dispute land values study</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/1243</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Roger Weaver, owner of three RE/MAX Community Realty offices in Kittitas County, said he testified and challenged the consultant’s study. He said there was “no way a wind farm won’t have a significant impact on residential development in the Kittitas Valley.”
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Roger Weaver, owner of three RE/MAX Community Realty offices in Kittitas County, said he testified and challenged the consultant’s study. He said there was “no way a wind farm won’t have a significant impact on residential development in the Kittitas Valley.”
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/1243</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Testimony of David Taylor Before the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/306</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Q. In your experience, do adjacent land uses affect property values?<p>

A. Yes. It's been my experience property values are directly affected by neighboring land uses. For example, property uses that create noise, light, glare, and other such nuisances often negatively affect property values.<p> ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Q. In your experience, do adjacent land uses affect property values?

A. Yes. It's been my experience property values are directly affected by neighboring land uses. For example, property uses that create noise, light, glare, and other such nuisances often negatively affect property values.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/306</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Economic Impacts of Wind Power in Kittitas County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/194</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Study Objectives <p>
Primary Analysis Questions:<p> 
1) Determine effect of wind turbines on 
residential property values <p>
2) Determine economic impacts to local 
economy <p>
3) Estimate new tax revenues for Kittitas 
County from proposed wind farm.<p>

This study along with the REPP study are the two most often cited by wind developers to support their claim that industrial windplants do not adversely affect property values.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Study Objectives 
Primary Analysis Questions: 
1) Determine effect of wind turbines on 
residential property values 
2) Determine economic impacts to local 
economy 
3) Estimate new tax revenues for Kittitas 
County from proposed wind farm.

This study along with the REPP study are the two most often cited by wind developers to support their claim that industrial windplants do not adversely affect property values.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/194</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Local Reaction to the ECO-Northwest “Economic” Study Of Wind Farms</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/549</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ ECO-Northwest’s 1-month, $15,000 study, sponsored by the local business lobby organization, the Phoenix Group, has been met with deep skepticism in the Kittitas Valley. Regardless of how people feel about wind farms in this valley, most people recognize this report as simply a blatant endorsement of proposed local wind energy projects, bought and paid for by those behind these projects. A local newspaper story about ECO Northwest’s report  titled “Are Wind Farm Benefits Full of Hot Air?” (The Yakima Herald-Republic, 10/2102) reflects this public skepticism about the impartiality of this study. </p>

The report makes the incredible claim that property values will not be affected and the unsubstantiated claim that the county will receive millions of dollars in increased revenue. Although the wind energy companies state that they will hire only 22 people, the report manages to inflate this to 53 jobs and claims that these people will somehow result in an additional $4.2m being spent within the county.</p>
 
ECO Northwest’s report also neglects to consider the effect of major wind farms on tourism, one of the most important factors in the local economy. It does not consider alternative locations for such projects, or alternative forms of renewable energy in Kittitas County, or whether the county will benefit from the power generated. Nor does it consider that the proposed location for these wind farms is an area that the city of Ellensburg will need for future expansion of its population, an area that will be closed off for housing if wind farms are built there.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>ECO-Northwest’s 1-month, $15,000 study, sponsored by the local business lobby organization, the Phoenix Group, has been met with deep skepticism in the Kittitas Valley. Regardless of how people feel about wind farms in this valley, most people recognize this report as simply a blatant endorsement of proposed local wind energy projects, bought and paid for by those behind these projects. A local newspaper story about ECO Northwest’s report  titled “Are Wind Farm Benefits Full of Hot Air?” (The Yakima Herald-Republic, 10/2102) reflects this public skepticism about the impartiality of this study. 

The report makes the incredible claim that property values will not be affected and the unsubstantiated claim that the county will receive millions of dollars in increased revenue. Although the wind energy companies state that they will hire only 22 people, the report manages to inflate this to 53 jobs and claims that these people will somehow result in an additional $4.2m being spent within the county.
 
ECO Northwest’s report also neglects to consider the effect of major wind farms on tourism, one of the most important factors in the local economy. It does not consider alternative locations for such projects, or alternative forms of renewable energy in Kittitas County, or whether the county will benefit from the power generated. Nor does it consider that the proposed location for these wind farms is an area that the city of Ellensburg will need for future expansion of its population, an area that will be closed off for housing if wind farms are built there.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/549</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
