    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c107+52?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Map of Potential Wind Sites in Northeast</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/240</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  ]]></content:encoded>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/240</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Commission's goal is 'empowering' towns in power projects in Vermont</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38296</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:11:52 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ &quot;Overall, I can say with some confidence that we have addressed the issues we consistently heard from the public and the industry developers alike -- that our current process is too complicated, too expensive, too slow, not transparent enough and not sensitive enough to cultural and environmental considerations,&quot; he said. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>&quot;Overall, I can say with some confidence that we have addressed the issues we consistently heard from the public and the industry developers alike -- that our current process is too complicated, too expensive, too slow, not transparent enough and not sensitive enough to cultural and environmental considerations,&quot; he said.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38296</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vt. Legislature's push to address concerns about wind power projects sputters, splinters</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38273</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ On Friday, the Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee agreed to the House's pared-down version of what was originally a bill regulating large wind turbine projects, including a three-year moratorium.

But although Senate bill 30 is moving forward without any controls on energy siting, some key provisions are still on the table. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>On Friday, the Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee agreed to the House's pared-down version of what was originally a bill regulating large wind turbine projects, including a three-year moratorium.

But although Senate bill 30 is moving forward without any controls on energy siting, some key provisions are still on the table.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38273</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Siting commission recommends more transparent, inclusive permitting process for energy projects</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38244</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ On Tuesday, the Vermont Energy Generation Siting Policy Commission submitted its final report and recommendations to the governor and the Vermont Legislature. The commission recommends a revision of the Section 248 permitting process. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>On Tuesday, the Vermont Energy Generation Siting Policy Commission submitted its final report and recommendations to the governor and the Vermont Legislature. The commission recommends a revision of the Section 248 permitting process.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38244</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>No freeze on wind projects, but greater voice for towns</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38192</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:25:16 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Advocates of the temporary ban say a compromise package being voted out of a House committee this week could at least bring more scrutiny of the regulatory process that governs ridgeline wind projects. ...Sen. Robert Hartwell, a Bennington County Democrat and lead sponsor of the original moratorium language, said he believes those summer hearings will yield legislation next year that will amplify citizens' voices in the regulatory process. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Advocates of the temporary ban say a compromise package being voted out of a House committee this week could at least bring more scrutiny of the regulatory process that governs ridgeline wind projects. ...Sen. Robert Hartwell, a Bennington County Democrat and lead sponsor of the original moratorium language, said he believes those summer hearings will yield legislation next year that will amplify citizens' voices in the regulatory process.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38192</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Energy Siting Panel: Towns could say no to big wind</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/38129</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:26:33 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  The latest round of draft recommendations from the Governor's Energy Generation Siting Policy Commission would not force a town like Newark or Brighton to find a place for big wind turbines, unlike a previous draft.

Instead, the draft recommendations now say that towns can reject one form of renewable technology as long as the towns promote alternative renewable energy projects instead. ]]></content:encoded>
<description> The latest round of draft recommendations from the Governor's Energy Generation Siting Policy Commission would not force a town like Newark or Brighton to find a place for big wind turbines, unlike a previous draft.

Instead, the draft recommendations now say that towns can reject one form of renewable technology as long as the towns promote alternative renewable energy projects instead.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/38129</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vermont Senate: Study turbine impacts</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37915</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 19:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ On Friday, Galbraith argued that the significance of that assessment and report should not be downplayed. Armed with information from the study, lawmakers could revisit the wind-power legislation in their next session starting in January.

&quot;Then, we have our bite at the apple,&quot; Galbraith said.

He also pointed out that the bill still contains a provision banning wind turbines -- or any other commercial development -- on state land.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>On Friday, Galbraith argued that the significance of that assessment and report should not be downplayed. Armed with information from the study, lawmakers could revisit the wind-power legislation in their next session starting in January.

&quot;Then, we have our bite at the apple,&quot; Galbraith said.

He also pointed out that the bill still contains a provision banning wind turbines -- or any other commercial development -- on state land. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37915</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vt. Senate passes scaled-down wind bill</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37864</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:48:46 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The 24-6 vote came after a much closer series of votes on an amendment to remove provisions requiring greater consideration of town and regional plans when the Public Service Board reviews energy projects. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The 24-6 vote came after a much closer series of votes on an amendment to remove provisions requiring greater consideration of town and regional plans when the Public Service Board reviews energy projects.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37864</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vt. Green energy bill advances but is scaled down</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37865</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 01:18:58 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Foes of mountaintop wind power in Vermont were dealt a setback Tuesday when a bill calling for more study of large-scale renewable energy development was significantly reduced in scope.

Though the bill won preliminary approval in the Senate, it was only after provision calling for a slowdown of such development was scaled back, then removed completely. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Foes of mountaintop wind power in Vermont were dealt a setback Tuesday when a bill calling for more study of large-scale renewable energy development was significantly reduced in scope.

Though the bill won preliminary approval in the Senate, it was only after provision calling for a slowdown of such development was scaled back, then removed completely.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37865</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vote on controversial bill on siting of energy projects delayed</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37790</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Senate Bill 30 is being pushed by critics of wind projects that they say have been damaging Vermont's mountaintops without significantly reducing the state's greenhouse gaCampbell said the delay was partly in response to a letter he received from Jeff Wolfe, owner of GroSolar, who threatened to work to unseat Campbell if he voted for the bill. Because Campbell would be presiding over the Senate on Wednesday, he couldn’t vote on the bill, which he did not want to be interpreted as cowering to the threat.s emissions. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Senate Bill 30 is being pushed by critics of wind projects that they say have been damaging Vermont's mountaintops without significantly reducing the state's greenhouse gaCampbell said the delay was partly in response to a letter he received from Jeff Wolfe, owner of GroSolar, who threatened to work to unseat Campbell if he voted for the bill. Because Campbell would be presiding over the Senate on Wednesday, he couldn’t vote on the bill, which he did not want to be interpreted as cowering to the threat.s emissions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37790</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Senators drop wind moratorium</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37534</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Requiring the Public Service Board to enforce Act 250 criteria, the state's governing land-use law, which relies heavily on town plans, was also a substantial change, Hartwell said.

While the Public Service Board already considers Act 250 criteria, the quasi-judicial body is not required to conform with the land-use law, according to Hartwell. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Requiring the Public Service Board to enforce Act 250 criteria, the state's governing land-use law, which relies heavily on town plans, was also a substantial change, Hartwell said.

While the Public Service Board already considers Act 250 criteria, the quasi-judicial body is not required to conform with the land-use law, according to Hartwell.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37534</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>In New England, a Natural Gas Trap</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37395</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The underlying issue in New England is that gas pipeline capacity is inadequate to keep prices steady in times of high home heating demand, said Vamsi Chadalavada, executive vice president and chief operating officer of ISO New England. ISO is leading a study focused mainly on reliability, but reliability is intertwined with price, he said. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The underlying issue in New England is that gas pipeline capacity is inadequate to keep prices steady in times of high home heating demand, said Vamsi Chadalavada, executive vice president and chief operating officer of ISO New England. ISO is leading a study focused mainly on reliability, but reliability is intertwined with price, he said.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37395</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Public Service Board chair opposes moving energy project permitting authority to Act 250 boards</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37267</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:21:44 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Volz said it would be difficult for the Public Service Board to ensure the state’s energy needs are met, if the board lost the power to permit energy generation projects.

“Projects being proposed by Vermont utilities for the purpose of maintaining reliability should stay with the Public Service Board,” he said.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Volz said it would be difficult for the Public Service Board to ensure the state’s energy needs are met, if the board lost the power to permit energy generation projects.

“Projects being proposed by Vermont utilities for the purpose of maintaining reliability should stay with the Public Service Board,” he said. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37267</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Activists press their case, but wind moratorium unlikely</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37228</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ &quot;The damage is physical in terms of geological and hydrologic effects. It's biological in that it destroys critical habitat and migration routes,&quot; he said. &quot;And it's aesthetic and cultural, not least in that it has caused deep divisions in the environmental community. These divisions play directly into the hands of corporate interests whose roots are outside Vermont.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>&quot;The damage is physical in terms of geological and hydrologic effects. It's biological in that it destroys critical habitat and migration routes,&quot; he said. &quot;And it's aesthetic and cultural, not least in that it has caused deep divisions in the environmental community. These divisions play directly into the hands of corporate interests whose roots are outside Vermont.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37228</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Vermont wind moratorium would impede efforts to combat global warming</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37173</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:12:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Sanders said he was weighing in on a state legislative issue - which Vermont's federal representatives usually avoid doing - because of the potential impact of the state's action on the national debate. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Sanders said he was weighing in on a state legislative issue - which Vermont's federal representatives usually avoid doing - because of the potential impact of the state's action on the national debate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37173</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Committee shake-up gives boost to statewide wind moratorium</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37004</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:46:41 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A rare shake-up in Senate committee assignments Thursday bounced Sen. Virginia Lyons out as chairwoman of the Natural Resources and Energy Committee she has led for many years, and put in her place a leading proponent of a statewide moratorium on wind development.
 
Sen. Robert Hartwell, D-Bennington, was appointed to chair the committee. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A rare shake-up in Senate committee assignments Thursday bounced Sen. Virginia Lyons out as chairwoman of the Natural Resources and Energy Committee she has led for many years, and put in her place a leading proponent of a statewide moratorium on wind development.
 
Sen. Robert Hartwell, D-Bennington, was appointed to chair the committee.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37004</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>VLCT Board considers Public Service Board process</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37039</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:53:37 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ After substantial discussion of the issue, the VLCT Board voted to support the position that the PSB be required to give substantial consideration to municipalities, by at least: requiring any decision on the project address the local concerns raised in the local decisions.
  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>After substantial discussion of the issue, the VLCT Board voted to support the position that the PSB be required to give substantial consideration to municipalities, by at least: requiring any decision on the project address the local concerns raised in the local decisions.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37039</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind moratorium bill unveiled at statehouse</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36954</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ “We shouldn’t permit ourselves to be pressured by corporate, mostly out-of-state entities, while we take that time,” said Hartwell. “We shouldn’t be allowing our cherished mountains, our cherished history to be destroyed while we take that time. We shouldn’t involve ourselves in social upheaval while we take that time. For that reason, a bipartisan effort … is being made to make sure we back up the train, set the reset button and redefine a conversation with Vermont’s history and environmental proactivism involved in the discussion.” ]]></content:encoded>
<description>“We shouldn’t permit ourselves to be pressured by corporate, mostly out-of-state entities, while we take that time,” said Hartwell. “We shouldn’t be allowing our cherished mountains, our cherished history to be destroyed while we take that time. We shouldn’t involve ourselves in social upheaval while we take that time. For that reason, a bipartisan effort … is being made to make sure we back up the train, set the reset button and redefine a conversation with Vermont’s history and environmental proactivism involved in the discussion.”</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36954</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Bill seeks to ban wind projects </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36891</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ &quot;And I think the reason you're seeing folks come around on this issue is that members are beginning to see projects proposed in their districts, and so are beginning to understand what it actually means for their constituents,&quot; he said.

Senate President John Campbell says the vote count in favor of the moratorium could be as high as 18. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>&quot;And I think the reason you're seeing folks come around on this issue is that members are beginning to see projects proposed in their districts, and so are beginning to understand what it actually means for their constituents,&quot; he said.

Senate President John Campbell says the vote count in favor of the moratorium could be as high as 18. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36891</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Call continues for wind moratorium</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36850</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:16:18 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Vermont Senate is likely to consider a moratorium when the Legislature convenes in January, Senate President Pro Tempore John Campbell said. He supports a two-year moratorium and said a growing number of senators do.

&quot;I believe for two years we should look at what we expect Vermont to look like,&quot; Campbell said.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Vermont Senate is likely to consider a moratorium when the Legislature convenes in January, Senate President Pro Tempore John Campbell said. He supports a two-year moratorium and said a growing number of senators do.

&quot;I believe for two years we should look at what we expect Vermont to look like,&quot; Campbell said.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36850</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
