    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c106?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Possible wind development sites in Bath County, VA</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17488</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Commercial wind projects in the Appalachian region are typically built in strings of about seven turbines per mile along ridge crests. This map shows the potential for 88 miles of turbine strings on Bath County ridges.

Possible development sites occur within Wind Power Class 3 through 7, and were derived from resource maps obtained from the National Renewable Energy Lab. Of the possible turbine sites in Bath County Virginia, 52 percent are located on national forest land and 12 percent are located on The Nature Conservancy's Warm Springs Mountain Preserve; 25 percent of the total possible turbine sites are presumably off limits, including all of those in TNC's preserve and about one-third of those on national forest. The identification of national forest lands as &quot;suitable&quot; or &quot;unsuitable&quot; is based on the draft management plan for the George Washington National Forest. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Commercial wind projects in the Appalachian region are typically built in strings of about seven turbines per mile along ridge crests. This map shows the potential for 88 miles of turbine strings on Bath County ridges.

Possible development sites occur within Wind Power Class 3 through 7, and were derived from resource maps obtained from the National Renewable Energy Lab. Of the possible turbine sites in Bath County Virginia, 52 percent are located on national forest land and 12 percent are located on The Nature Conservancy's Warm Springs Mountain Preserve; 25 percent of the total possible turbine sites are presumably off limits, including all of those in TNC's preserve and about one-third of those on national forest. The identification of national forest lands as &quot;suitable&quot; or &quot;unsuitable&quot; is based on the draft management plan for the George Washington National Forest.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17488</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Highland County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7914</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:39:50 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A plan to put 19 wind turbines in an area of Highland County, Va. has prompted debate. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A plan to put 19 wind turbines in an area of Highland County, Va. has prompted debate. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7914</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Monterey - Virginia's Little Switzerland</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/2070</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:56:08 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Monterey is the county seat of Highland County whose mountains and climate have local boosters calling it &quot;Virginia's Little Switzerland.&quot; ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Monterey is the county seat of Highland County whose mountains and climate have local boosters calling it &quot;Virginia's Little Switzerland.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/2070</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Governor signs repeal of renewable energy incentives</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37479</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:13:30 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The change means utilities, such as Dominion Virginia Power, will no longer be eligible for a bonus for obtaining a certain portion of their energy from renewable sources, such as solar power. Reduced incentives remain for nuclear and offshore wind power. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The change means utilities, such as Dominion Virginia Power, will no longer be eligible for a bonus for obtaining a certain portion of their energy from renewable sources, such as solar power. Reduced incentives remain for nuclear and offshore wind power.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37479</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Va. General Assembly strikes down tall structures legislation </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37208</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Legislation that could have trumped Tazewell County's two-year-old ridgeline protection ordinance has died in the General Assembly. ...Area leaders argued the bill was an attempt to override a local county ordinance that prohibits the development of tall structures, including wind turbines, on East River Mountain and other protected ridgelines.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Legislation that could have trumped Tazewell County's two-year-old ridgeline protection ordinance has died in the General Assembly. ...Area leaders argued the bill was an attempt to override a local county ordinance that prohibits the development of tall structures, including wind turbines, on East River Mountain and other protected ridgelines.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37208</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbines: VACo joins Tazewell opposition </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37144</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Charles Stacy, eastern district representative on the board of supervisors said that the Virginia Association of Counties has expressed concerns about SB 1341, the renewable energy facilities; exemption from land use regulations,&quot; bill that was introduced in the General Assembly by State Senator Richard L. Saslaw, D-Springfield. &quot;VACo is adamantly opposed to this bill for reasons other than windmills.&quot;  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Charles Stacy, eastern district representative on the board of supervisors said that the Virginia Association of Counties has expressed concerns about SB 1341, the renewable energy facilities; exemption from land use regulations,&quot; bill that was introduced in the General Assembly by State Senator Richard L. Saslaw, D-Springfield. &quot;VACo is adamantly opposed to this bill for reasons other than windmills.&quot; </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37144</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Legislation in General Assembly seeks renewable energy exemption </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37124</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ State Senator Richard L. Saslaw, D-Springfield, introduced Senate Bill 1341, the &quot;Renewable energy facilities; exemption from land use regulations,&quot; bill. According to the bill summary, the bill: &quot;Exempts certain electrical generation facilities powered by renewable sources of energy from local zoning and land use requirements.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>State Senator Richard L. Saslaw, D-Springfield, introduced Senate Bill 1341, the &quot;Renewable energy facilities; exemption from land use regulations,&quot; bill. According to the bill summary, the bill: &quot;Exempts certain electrical generation facilities powered by renewable sources of energy from local zoning and land use requirements. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37124</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Virginia offshore wind farm might not be built for another decade - or more</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/37058</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The earliest Virginia offshore commercial wind development could occur would likely be 2022, or even five years later than that, energy officials said Thursday.

Getting the required permits to build an offshore wind farm could take seven years alone.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The earliest Virginia offshore commercial wind development could occur would likely be 2022, or even five years later than that, energy officials said Thursday.

Getting the required permits to build an offshore wind farm could take seven years alone.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/37058</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Critics call Virginia's renewable energy bonuses a waste renewable energy</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/36302</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 23:22:02 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Environmental groups say Virginia‘s renewable-energy program is a loophole-riddled corporate giveaway that allows utilities to boost rates without building a single wind or solar facility in the Old Dominion.
 
Republican Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli calls the whole subsidy arrangement a waste. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Environmental groups say Virginia‘s renewable-energy program is a loophole-riddled corporate giveaway that allows utilities to boost rates without building a single wind or solar facility in the Old Dominion.
 
Republican Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli calls the whole subsidy arrangement a waste.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/36302</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>County could take action on windmills Monday night</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35989</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:22:38 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Carroll County Supervisor Bob Martin believes the county needs to go ahead and take action one way or another in regards to windmills in the county. A formal recommendation is expected Monday night.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Carroll County Supervisor Bob Martin believes the county needs to go ahead and take action one way or another in regards to windmills in the county. A formal recommendation is expected Monday night. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35989</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>County will take more time to study windmills</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35820</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ After the public hearing, Board of Supervisors' Chairman Sam Dickson asked supervisors Bob Martin and Joshua Hendrick if they wanted to make a suggestion about windmills since they make up the county's committee to study windmills. Martin said there still seemed to be a lot of confusion. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>After the public hearing, Board of Supervisors' Chairman Sam Dickson asked supervisors Bob Martin and Joshua Hendrick if they wanted to make a suggestion about windmills since they make up the county's committee to study windmills. Martin said there still seemed to be a lot of confusion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35820</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Company delays Roanoke County wind farm </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/35072</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The company, which once hoped to have the power-generating turbines spinning by the end of this year, said its decision was based on the uncertain future of government incentives for wind energy. ...Invenergy's announcement was seen as a setback for local supporters of renewable energy, but good news for some Poor Mountain residents, who fear that the 443-foot-tall turbines will be a noisy eyesore to their peaceful community.
  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The company, which once hoped to have the power-generating turbines spinning by the end of this year, said its decision was based on the uncertain future of government incentives for wind energy. ...Invenergy's announcement was seen as a setback for local supporters of renewable energy, but good news for some Poor Mountain residents, who fear that the 443-foot-tall turbines will be a noisy eyesore to their peaceful community.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/35072</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Plans for Chesapeake Bay wind turbine suspended</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/34931</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:19:22 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A towering offshore wind turbine off the Eastern Shore seemed likely as recently as late March, when the state gave its blessing for a prototype energy spire in the Chesapeake Bay.
 
Barely one month later, those plans have been blown away.
  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A towering offshore wind turbine off the Eastern Shore seemed likely as recently as late March, when the state gave its blessing for a prototype energy spire in the Chesapeake Bay.
 
Barely one month later, those plans have been blown away.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/34931</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Offshore wind suffers setback in Virginia</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/34928</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 12:53:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Gamesa and a development partner are suspending further development of an offshore wind turbine off the coast of Virginia, citing the massive amounts of capital needed to pursue a project with a cloudy future due to uncertain federal support.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Gamesa and a development partner are suspending further development of an offshore wind turbine off the coast of Virginia, citing the massive amounts of capital needed to pursue a project with a cloudy future due to uncertain federal support. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/34928</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm concerns aired in Floyd County</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/34252</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:24:50 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Floyd County draft ordinance prohibits the construction, repair or improvement of structures more than 40 feet high on any ridge 2,000 feet or more above sea level and 500 feet or more above an adjacent valley floor, a geographical catchment area that covers much of Floyd County. The ordinance makes an exception for water, radio, telecommunications and television towers. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Floyd County draft ordinance prohibits the construction, repair or improvement of structures more than 40 feet high on any ridge 2,000 feet or more above sea level and 500 feet or more above an adjacent valley floor, a geographical catchment area that covers much of Floyd County. The ordinance makes an exception for water, radio, telecommunications and television towers.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/34252</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Floyd County ordinance likely wipes out wind turbines proposal</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/33825</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ &quot;I think this will help protect the natural beauty of the county, preserve the ridges,&quot; said Clinger.

A public hearing on the potential ridge line ordinance is scheduled for January 31st, but supervisors do not expect much if any opposition.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>&quot;I think this will help protect the natural beauty of the county, preserve the ridges,&quot; said Clinger.

A public hearing on the potential ridge line ordinance is scheduled for January 31st, but supervisors do not expect much if any opposition.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/33825</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Residents to get a chance to speak up on wind power</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/33726</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:18:04 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The panels are considering a proposed ordinance that would allow wind turbines in the medium-density residential district by special-use permit.

It calls for turbines to be 70 feet tall or shorter. They must be placed on land parcels that are a minimum of 1 acre.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The panels are considering a proposed ordinance that would allow wind turbines in the medium-density residential district by special-use permit.

It calls for turbines to be 70 feet tall or shorter. They must be placed on land parcels that are a minimum of 1 acre.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/33726</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Virginia's offshore battle: Wind Vs. oil drilling; Potential for off-shore drilling eyed</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/33596</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Obama administration's proposal to exclude Virginia from offshore drilling exploration has angered many top politicians in the commonwealth who view drilling as a potential source of jobs. But the decision has reinvigorated environmentalists' arguments that there's more to gain from wind power. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Obama administration's proposal to exclude Virginia from offshore drilling exploration has angered many top politicians in the commonwealth who view drilling as a potential source of jobs. But the decision has reinvigorated environmentalists' arguments that there's more to gain from wind power.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/33596</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Bent Mountain group sues over wind ordinance</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/33312</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:28:13 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ One company and 26 residents want the court to overturn the county's wind ordinance and prevent a company from erecting turbines near their homes, according to documents filed by Roanoke attorney John Fishwick on Thursday in Roanoke County Circuit Court.

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>One company and 26 residents want the court to overturn the county's wind ordinance and prevent a company from erecting turbines near their homes, according to documents filed by Roanoke attorney John Fishwick on Thursday in Roanoke County Circuit Court.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/33312</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Roanoke County supervisor wants to revisit wind turbine noise ordinance</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/33313</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:31:57 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Elswick asked the county board of supervisors on Tuesday to rescind a 60-decibel maximum limit on large wind turbines. That policy regulates how loud the turbines can be at the nearest property lines.

The 60-decibel limit is too high, Elswick said Tuesday. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Elswick asked the county board of supervisors on Tuesday to rescind a 60-decibel maximum limit on large wind turbines. That policy regulates how loud the turbines can be at the nearest property lines.

The 60-decibel limit is too high, Elswick said Tuesday. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/33313</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
