	<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
        <title>www.windaction.org</title>
        <subtitle>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</subtitle>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/" title="www.windaction.org" /> 
        <link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c106?theme=atom" rel="self"/>
		<author>
			<name>Windaction</name> 
		</author>
		<id>http://www.windaction.org/articles/c106?theme=atom</id>
        <generator uri="http://www.xaraya.com" version="1.00">Xarayar</generator>
		<updated>2006-06-12T02:16:27Z</updated>
		            <p>
       [
             
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c106+116/">
                Impact on Landscape</a>
       ]
   </p>
<div id="main-content">
   <ul>
                <li>
                    <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/17488">
<img src="http://www.windaction.org/images/1666.jpg?height=117&amp;width=150" alt="Possible wind development sites in Bath County, VA"  width="150" height="117" />                        <span>
                            Possible wind development sites in Bath County, VA</span>
                   </a>
               </li>
</ul>
</div>


<div class="xar-articles-keywords">
</div>            <p>
       [
             
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c106+112/">
                General</a>
       ]
   </p>
<div id="main-content">
   <ul>
                <li>
                    <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/7914">
<img src="http://www.windaction.org/images/1158.jpg?height=57&amp;width=150" alt="Highland County"  width="150" height="57" />                        <span>
                            Highland County</span>
                   </a>
               </li>
</ul>
</div>


<div class="xar-articles-keywords">
</div>            <p>
       [
             
            <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c106+112/">
                General</a>
       ]
   </p>
<div id="main-content">
   <ul>
                <li>
                    <a href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/2070">
<img src="http://www.windaction.org/images/558.jpg?height=100&amp;width=150" alt="Monterey - Virginia's Little Switzerland"  width="150" height="100" />                        <span>
                            Monterey - Virginia's Little Switzerland</span>
                   </a>
               </li>
</ul>
</div>


<div class="xar-articles-keywords">
</div>            <entry>
	<title>Windmill debate churns</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24140" title="Windmill debate churns"/> 
	<id>.24140</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-18T11:37:12Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-18T11:37:12Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Although the official public hearing was delayed until January, area residents still spoke out Tuesday over the controversial topic of wind turbines.

&amp;quot;How are we guaranteed that so many jobs will be created?&amp;quot; Mark Tyson of Tazewell, said. &amp;quot;We have to take the word of BP and Dominion - the same people who funded 50 percent of this study.&amp;quot;

&amp;quot;As far as this study is concerned, I know it is an economic impact study, but I pray there will be other studies you all will look at other than economics,&amp;quot; Donna Kelly of Bluefield, Va., said. &amp;quot;It's not all just about money. I feel a few will profit from this but the majority will suffer.&amp;quot;
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24140">
		<![CDATA[ Although the official public hearing was delayed until January, area residents still spoke out Tuesday over the controversial topic of wind turbines.

&amp;quot;How are we guaranteed that so many jobs will be created?&amp;quot; Mark Tyson of Tazewell, said. &amp;quot;We have to take the word of BP and Dominion - the same people who funded 50 percent of this study.&amp;quot;

&amp;quot;As far as this study is concerned, I know it is an economic impact study, but I pray there will be other studies you all will look at other than economics,&amp;quot; Donna Kelly of Bluefield, Va., said. &amp;quot;It's not all just about money. I feel a few will profit from this but the majority will suffer.&amp;quot;
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Windmill study provides statistics and more for divided community</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24138" title="Windmill study provides statistics and more for divided community"/> 
	<id>.24138</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-18T11:32:00Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-18T11:32:00Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The long-awaited wind energy study compiled by Springsted Inc., was released on Monday. While it didn't include a lot of surprises, it did come with plenty of statistics, projections and hypothetical scenarios related to wind turbine farms. ...While it doesn't provide a lot of new details, the Springsted study still provides a lot of information for folks to digest. The official public hearing on the proposed mountain construction ordinance, also known as the mountain ridge protection ordinance, will be held on Tuesday, Dec. 1, at 6:15 p.m. or soon thereafter at Tazewell High School.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24138">
		<![CDATA[ The long-awaited wind energy study compiled by Springsted Inc., was released on Monday. While it didn't include a lot of surprises, it did come with plenty of statistics, projections and hypothetical scenarios related to wind turbine farms. ...While it doesn't provide a lot of new details, the Springsted study still provides a lot of information for folks to digest. The official public hearing on the proposed mountain construction ordinance, also known as the mountain ridge protection ordinance, will be held on Tuesday, Dec. 1, at 6:15 p.m. or soon thereafter at Tazewell High School. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind energy study details Tazewell County impact</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24112" title="Wind energy study details Tazewell County impact"/> 
	<id>.24112</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-17T12:04:31Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-17T12:04:31Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A proposed wind turbine farm for East River Mountain would provide $9.2 million in new revenue to Tazewell County over a 20 year period, according to the findings of a new wind energy economic impact study. 

The study, which was made public Monday through the county's website, will be discussed in detail at tonight's Board of Supervisors meeting. The meeting begins at 5 p.m. at Tazewell Middle School with a wind turbine discussion scheduled for 7:30 p.m. 

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24112">
		<![CDATA[ A proposed wind turbine farm for East River Mountain would provide $9.2 million in new revenue to Tazewell County over a 20 year period, according to the findings of a new wind energy economic impact study. 

The study, which was made public Monday through the county's website, will be discussed in detail at tonight's Board of Supervisors meeting. The meeting begins at 5 p.m. at Tazewell Middle School with a wind turbine discussion scheduled for 7:30 p.m. 

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Pivotal turn coming in Tazewell windmill saga</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24087" title="Pivotal turn coming in Tazewell windmill saga"/> 
	<id>.24087</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-14T18:56:53Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-14T18:56:53Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Tazewell County leaders will tackle the controversial topic of wind turbines Tuesday during the first of two meetings that could determine the fate of a controversial East River Mountain project.

The board meets Tuesday at 5 p.m. at Tazewell Middle School, and will begin the wind turbine discussion at 7:30 p.m. At that time, John Anzivion, senior vice president of the Springsted Company, is scheduled to present the results of a wind turbine economic impact study to the board.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24087">
		<![CDATA[ Tazewell County leaders will tackle the controversial topic of wind turbines Tuesday during the first of two meetings that could determine the fate of a controversial East River Mountain project.

The board meets Tuesday at 5 p.m. at Tazewell Middle School, and will begin the wind turbine discussion at 7:30 p.m. At that time, John Anzivion, senior vice president of the Springsted Company, is scheduled to present the results of a wind turbine economic impact study to the board.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>New Tazewell board members: No decision on wind turbines</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24003" title="New Tazewell board members: No decision on wind turbines"/> 
	<id>.24003</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-09T16:43:59Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-09T16:43:59Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The newly elected members of the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors say they haven't made a decision yet when it comes to wind turbines on East River Mountain.

&amp;quot;I'm going to have to research that a little bit better,&amp;quot; John Absher, who defeated incumbent Bill Wimmer for the Western District board seat, said when asked about wind turbines. &amp;quot;I haven't made a decision on that one way or another. We are just going to have to talk about the pros and cons of it.&amp;quot;

Although the wind turbine project is not planned in his district, Absher said he has still had several questions from residents.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/24003">
		<![CDATA[ The newly elected members of the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors say they haven't made a decision yet when it comes to wind turbines on East River Mountain.

&amp;quot;I'm going to have to research that a little bit better,&amp;quot; John Absher, who defeated incumbent Bill Wimmer for the Western District board seat, said when asked about wind turbines. &amp;quot;I haven't made a decision on that one way or another. We are just going to have to talk about the pros and cons of it.&amp;quot;

Although the wind turbine project is not planned in his district, Absher said he has still had several questions from residents.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Virginia SCC postpones wind turbine hearing</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23990" title="Virginia SCC postpones wind turbine hearing"/> 
	<id>.23990</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-07T13:32:27Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-07T13:32:27Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A hearing scheduled for November 10 at the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) regarding the Tamarack Ridge wind energy project has been postponed by request of the Virginia Department of Historical Resources (DHR). ...DHR requested the continuance until it has received the requested information from the Parks Service and had time to &amp;quot;review, analyze and consult with Highland New Wind about these reports.&amp;quot;</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23990">
		<![CDATA[ A hearing scheduled for November 10 at the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) regarding the Tamarack Ridge wind energy project has been postponed by request of the Virginia Department of Historical Resources (DHR). ...DHR requested the continuance until it has received the requested information from the Parks Service and had time to &amp;quot;review, analyze and consult with Highland New Wind about these reports.&amp;quot; ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Can visual impacts be mitigated? West Virginia agency accepts grant offer from wind company</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23963" title="Can visual impacts be mitigated? West Virginia agency accepts grant offer from wind company"/> 
	<id>.23963</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-05T19:44:23Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-05T19:44:23Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">As Virginia wrangles over the visual impact of 400-foot towers on nearby historic properties, a similar situation in West Virginia resulted in a $10,000 grant offer from a wind energy company building 23 wind turbines overlooking some 18 historic places in Mineral County.

Not everyone agrees it's an appropriate solution, but Pinnacle Wind Force LLC offered to make that amount available for historic preservation efforts after the West Virginia Division of Culture and History (the State Historic Preservation Office) found its wind project would have an adverse impact on historic resources nearby.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23963">
		<![CDATA[ As Virginia wrangles over the visual impact of 400-foot towers on nearby historic properties, a similar situation in West Virginia resulted in a $10,000 grant offer from a wind energy company building 23 wind turbines overlooking some 18 historic places in Mineral County.

Not everyone agrees it's an appropriate solution, but Pinnacle Wind Force LLC offered to make that amount available for historic preservation efforts after the West Virginia Division of Culture and History (the State Historic Preservation Office) found its wind project would have an adverse impact on historic resources nearby.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Boundary commission visits Tamarack Ridge</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23968" title="Boundary commission visits Tamarack Ridge"/> 
	<id>.23968</id> 
	<updated>2009-11-04T22:23:12Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-11-04T22:23:12Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">West Virginia boundary commission members Charles Sypolt and Curt Keplinger visited Tamarack Ridge Saturday morning to inspect the site of a proposed industrial wind farm. ...Governor Manchin formed the boundary commission in September after the Pocahontas County Commission alerted him that the wind project might encroach into West Virginia territory. 

The county commission became concerned after the developer, Highland New Wind Development, LLC (HNWD), issued a site plan with the state line re-plotted on the base topographic map and two turbines very close to the re-plotted state line.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23968">
		<![CDATA[ West Virginia boundary commission members Charles Sypolt and Curt Keplinger visited Tamarack Ridge Saturday morning to inspect the site of a proposed industrial wind farm. ...Governor Manchin formed the boundary commission in September after the Pocahontas County Commission alerted him that the wind project might encroach into West Virginia territory. 

The county commission became concerned after the developer, Highland New Wind Development, LLC (HNWD), issued a site plan with the state line re-plotted on the base topographic map and two turbines very close to the re-plotted state line.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Waiting in wings on windmills</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23721" title="Waiting in wings on windmills"/> 
	<id>.23721</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-20T00:13:08Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-20T00:13:08Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Several additional companies have inquired about the possibility of building windmills in Tazewell County, officials confirmed Monday.

Although Dominion and BP Wind Energy North America are planning a large-scale wind turbine farm for East River Mountain near Bluefield, other areas of interest for other wind energy companies have included Morris Knob, near Tazewell, and Burkes Garden, according to Board of Supervisors Chairman David Anderson.

</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23721">
		<![CDATA[ Several additional companies have inquired about the possibility of building windmills in Tazewell County, officials confirmed Monday.

Although Dominion and BP Wind Energy North America are planning a large-scale wind turbine farm for East River Mountain near Bluefield, other areas of interest for other wind energy companies have included Morris Knob, near Tazewell, and Burkes Garden, according to Board of Supervisors Chairman David Anderson.

 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>State agency reviewing wind developer's analysis</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23772" title="State agency reviewing wind developer's analysis"/> 
	<id>.23772</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-17T01:17:02Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-17T01:17:02Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Late last Friday, before a hearing scheduled for Tuesday this week, Highland New Wind Development submitted further analysis of its wind project to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. 

The hearing was set by the State Corporation Commission following a complaint from DHR that a condition attached to HNWD's state permit for Virginia's first wind utility were not being met. DHR said it believed the SCC's condition to &amp;quot;coordinate with DHR for guidance regarding the potential need for archaeological and architectural surveys, recommended studies and field
surveys to evaluate the project's impacts to historic resources,&amp;quot; had meaning, and that HNWD was not coordinating with the agency as ordered.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23772">
		<![CDATA[ Late last Friday, before a hearing scheduled for Tuesday this week, Highland New Wind Development submitted further analysis of its wind project to the Virginia Department of Historic Resources. 

The hearing was set by the State Corporation Commission following a complaint from DHR that a condition attached to HNWD's state permit for Virginia's first wind utility were not being met. DHR said it believed the SCC's condition to &amp;quot;coordinate with DHR for guidance regarding the potential need for archaeological and architectural surveys, recommended studies and field
surveys to evaluate the project's impacts to historic resources,&amp;quot; had meaning, and that HNWD was not coordinating with the agency as ordered.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Hearing on Tamarack Ridge wind project rescheduled</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23626" title="Hearing on Tamarack Ridge wind project rescheduled"/> 
	<id>.23626</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-14T07:17:24Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-14T07:17:24Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) has rescheduled a hearing to determine whether a wind energy company has complied with pre-construction conditions regarding protection of historic resources. The hearing, originally scheduled for October 12, will be held on November 11 at 10 a.m. The hearing will be available as a webcast from the SCC website. 

The Virginia Attorney General's Office, representing DHR, filed a motion on October 9 to reschedule the hearing, which was granted by hearing examiner Alexander Skirpan.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23626">
		<![CDATA[ The Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) has rescheduled a hearing to determine whether a wind energy company has complied with pre-construction conditions regarding protection of historic resources. The hearing, originally scheduled for October 12, will be held on November 11 at 10 a.m. The hearing will be available as a webcast from the SCC website. 

The Virginia Attorney General's Office, representing DHR, filed a motion on October 9 to reschedule the hearing, which was granted by hearing examiner Alexander Skirpan.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Wind farm developers address state's concerns</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23535" title="Wind farm developers address state's concerns"/> 
	<id>.23535</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-10T11:52:48Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-10T11:52:48Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The SCC had scheduled the hearing on a complaint from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, which had accused Highland New Wind Development of failing to consult with it on how the wind farm will affect the nearby Camp Allegheny battlefield.

But on Friday, Highland New Wind provided two preliminary studies to the Department of Historic Resources, according to a motion filed with the SCC late in the day.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23535">
		<![CDATA[ The SCC had scheduled the hearing on a complaint from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, which had accused Highland New Wind Development of failing to consult with it on how the wind farm will affect the nearby Camp Allegheny battlefield.

But on Friday, Highland New Wind provided two preliminary studies to the Department of Historic Resources, according to a motion filed with the SCC late in the day.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Planning Commission: Allow wind turbines</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23483" title="Planning Commission: Allow wind turbines"/> 
	<id>.23483</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-07T16:43:54Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-07T16:43:54Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">Albemarle County Planning Commission members sent a clear message Tuesday: The county should allow wind turbines. 
Turbines are prohibited in Albemarle, but the Planning Commission unanimously approved a resolution calling for the county to allow small power-generating wind turbines. However, some specifics about where turbines should be allowed and what restrictions should be established were left up in the air.
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23483">
		<![CDATA[ Albemarle County Planning Commission members sent a clear message Tuesday: The county should allow wind turbines. 
Turbines are prohibited in Albemarle, but the Planning Commission unanimously approved a resolution calling for the county to allow small power-generating wind turbines. However, some specifics about where turbines should be allowed and what restrictions should be established were left up in the air.
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Tazewell officials hope for wind energy study by next week</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23493" title="Tazewell officials hope for wind energy study by next week"/> 
	<id>.23493</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-06T20:59:20Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-06T20:59:20Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">A long-awaited wind energy economic impact study for Tazewell County could be ready as early as next week. ...Following a five-minute recess in Tuesday's meeting, [County Administrator Jim] Spencer told media representatives that he was told by Springsted officials on the telephone that the wind energy study wouldn't be finished until mid-October.


</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23493">
		<![CDATA[ A long-awaited wind energy economic impact study for Tazewell County could be ready as early as next week. ...Following a five-minute recess in Tuesday's meeting, [County Administrator Jim] Spencer told media representatives that he was told by Springsted officials on the telephone that the wind energy study wouldn't be finished until mid-October.


 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>York planning staff told to craft wind turbine rules</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23395" title="York planning staff told to craft wind turbine rules"/> 
	<id>.23395</id> 
	<updated>2009-10-01T01:41:07Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-10-01T01:41:07Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">York officials have taken the first steps toward crafting wind turbine regulations.

At a Wednesday night Planning Commission work session, the five commissioners in attendance were unanimous in their support for regulations that would permit the use of wind turbines for generating electricity.

During the lengthy discussion, commissioners differed on how regulations should be applied.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23395">
		<![CDATA[ York officials have taken the first steps toward crafting wind turbine regulations.

At a Wednesday night Planning Commission work session, the five commissioners in attendance were unanimous in their support for regulations that would permit the use of wind turbines for generating electricity.

During the lengthy discussion, commissioners differed on how regulations should be applied. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>Virginia to consider visual impact in wind turbine approval</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23396" title="Virginia to consider visual impact in wind turbine approval"/> 
	<id>.23396</id> 
	<updated>2009-09-30T01:49:27Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-09-30T01:49:27Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The company planning an industrial wind facility on Tamarack Ridge didn't want to talk about visual impact on Camp Allegheny when it seeks approval to build the 19 gigantic turbines. 

But a Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) hearing examiner ordered on September 23 that visual impact will be considered when the SCC hears arguments over the company's compliance with permit conditions. 
</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23396">
		<![CDATA[ The company planning an industrial wind facility on Tamarack Ridge didn't want to talk about visual impact on Camp Allegheny when it seeks approval to build the 19 gigantic turbines. 

But a Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) hearing examiner ordered on September 23 that visual impact will be considered when the SCC hears arguments over the company's compliance with permit conditions. 
 ]]>
	</content>
</entry>            <entry>
	<title>York tilts gently at energy windmills</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23325" title="York tilts gently at energy windmills"/> 
	<id>.23325</id> 
	<updated>2009-09-26T13:38:26Z</updated> 
	<published>2009-09-26T13:38:26Z</published> 
	<summary type="text">The Planning Commission will consider during a work session next week whether York County should create a zoning ordinance allowing wind turbines in neighborhoods. ...Planning staff suggest proceeding slowly. &amp;quot;The lack of any first-hand, real-world experience with wind turbines anywhere in the region probably calls for a cautious approach,&amp;quot; one document cautions.</summary>
	<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.windaction.org/articles/23325">
		<![CDATA[ The Planning Commission will consider during a work session next week whether York County should create a zoning ordinance allowing wind turbines in neighborhoods. ...Planning staff suggest proceeding slowly. &amp;quot;The lack of any first-hand, real-world experience with wind turbines anywhere in the region probably calls for a cautious approach,&amp;quot; one document cautions. ]]>
	</content>
</entry>	</feed>
