    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c104+67?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Colo. loses bid to Texas for Vestas research lab</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16157</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:16:33 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Colorado has lost out on a bid for a Vestas Wind Systems research center. 

Vestas, which opened a major blade-manufacturing plant earlier this year in Windsor, announced Monday it will locate the research facility in Houston. 

Colorado was the other finalist, according to Tom Clark, executive vice president of the Metro Denver Economic Development Corp. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Colorado has lost out on a bid for a Vestas Wind Systems research center. 

Vestas, which opened a major blade-manufacturing plant earlier this year in Windsor, announced Monday it will locate the research facility in Houston. 

Colorado was the other finalist, according to Tom Clark, executive vice president of the Metro Denver Economic Development Corp. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16157</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Renewables are coming, but sticker shock likely</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/13755</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Austin Energy customers are one reason the agency is moving ahead so rapidly, he said. They're willing to pay more for renewables - so much so, the program had to close when all the energy was spoken for. When the program reopened this month, most of the available energy sold out within the first week to industrial companies, despite a price difference of 2 cents per kilowatt hour. ...He also noted that adding renewables doesn't change customer expectations. 

&quot;They expect near-perfect reliability,&quot; he said, &quot;and they expect it at a low price.&quot; 

Springs Utilities, which is heavily reliant on coal to power its electric plants, had planned to build another coal plant within the next decade. But in the past six months, City Council members have said they want to delay the plant or cut its size by supplementing with renewables or managing demand better. 

Councilman Randy Purvis, who attended Wednesday's session, said Colorado Springs customers are like Austin's - they've said on surveys they're willing to pay more for alternatives, such as wind. 

But so far, Springs Utilities has offered only a small amount of wind, about 1 megawatt, and sells it to customers who sign up to pay more.


 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Austin Energy customers are one reason the agency is moving ahead so rapidly, he said. They're willing to pay more for renewables - so much so, the program had to close when all the energy was spoken for. When the program reopened this month, most of the available energy sold out within the first week to industrial companies, despite a price difference of 2 cents per kilowatt hour. ...He also noted that adding renewables doesn't change customer expectations. 

&quot;They expect near-perfect reliability,&quot; he said, &quot;and they expect it at a low price.&quot; 

Springs Utilities, which is heavily reliant on coal to power its electric plants, had planned to build another coal plant within the next decade. But in the past six months, City Council members have said they want to delay the plant or cut its size by supplementing with renewables or managing demand better. 

Councilman Randy Purvis, who attended Wednesday's session, said Colorado Springs customers are like Austin's - they've said on surveys they're willing to pay more for alternatives, such as wind. 

But so far, Springs Utilities has offered only a small amount of wind, about 1 megawatt, and sells it to customers who sign up to pay more.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/13755</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>BP to add wind power projects</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/7330</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:56:46 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ BP Alternative Energy North America Inc. expects to begin construction on five U.S. wind power generation projects in 2007 across four states, including Texas. 

The projects — also located in California, Colorado and North Dakota — are expected to deliver a combined generation capacity of 550 megawatts. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>BP Alternative Energy North America Inc. expects to begin construction on five U.S. wind power generation projects in 2007 across four states, including Texas. 

The projects — also located in California, Colorado and North Dakota — are expected to deliver a combined generation capacity of 550 megawatts. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/7330</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Ropin' the wind</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/6277</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:49:10 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Greenblatt noted that while wind power could produce impressive amounts of peak energy during strong gusts, the biggest problem was wind power’s intermittency. The problem could be addressed by a process called compressed air energy storage, where excess energy could be used to pump compressed air into underground storage facilities that could include abandoned mines. When the wind was not blowing, he said, the compressed air could be tapped and combined with the burning of natural gas to create high-efficiency electrical generators approximating the efficiency levels of coal-fueled power plants. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Greenblatt noted that while wind power could produce impressive amounts of peak energy during strong gusts, the biggest problem was wind power’s intermittency. The problem could be addressed by a process called compressed air energy storage, where excess energy could be used to pump compressed air into underground storage facilities that could include abandoned mines. When the wind was not blowing, he said, the compressed air could be tapped and combined with the burning of natural gas to create high-efficiency electrical generators approximating the efficiency levels of coal-fueled power plants. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/6277</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>How less became more: Wind, power and unintended consequences in the Colorado energy market</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/26827</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This new report from Colorado's natural gas industry says increased use of wind energy indirectly results in raised pollution levels produced by some coal-fired power plants along the Front Range. The report recommends curbing the use of wind energy during the next one or two years to levels that match power output at existing natural gas-fired power plants -- and building more natural gas plants in the long term. The introductory sections of the report are provided below. To access the full document click on the link at the bottom of this page. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>This new report from Colorado's natural gas industry says increased use of wind energy indirectly results in raised pollution levels produced by some coal-fired power plants along the Front Range. The report recommends curbing the use of wind energy during the next one or two years to levels that match power output at existing natural gas-fired power plants -- and building more natural gas plants in the long term. The introductory sections of the report are provided below. To access the full document click on the link at the bottom of this page.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/26827</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
