    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
     <channel>
        <title>www.windaction.org |  facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</title>
        <link>http://www.windaction.org/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://www.windaction.org/articles/c100+122?theme=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>facts, analysis, exposure of wind energy's real impacts</description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>Windaction</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:admin@windaction.org" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
            <item>
<title>Planning: special use for transfer station But questions compatibility with Comp Plan</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/24098</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The Planning Board voted to send two recommendations to the Town Council Monday in regard to a zoning change at the transfer station. 

In its first vote the board recommended a special use permit process for any development in the proposed zone, which could include a wind turbine. In its second vote, the board crafted a recommendation that pointed out concerns about the proposed zone's compatibility with the town's Comprehensive Plan.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The Planning Board voted to send two recommendations to the Town Council Monday in regard to a zoning change at the transfer station. 

In its first vote the board recommended a special use permit process for any development in the proposed zone, which could include a wind turbine. In its second vote, the board crafted a recommendation that pointed out concerns about the proposed zone's compatibility with the town's Comprehensive Plan.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/24098</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Transfer station windmill proposal met with neighborly blowback</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/23232</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:50:43 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Byron was on hand to explain the abbey's decision to install a wind turbine at the school three years ago and the financial benefits the school has enjoyed since.

But the rosy picture he painted, and whether it could translate to Block Island, was challenged by many transfer station neighbors in the Town Hall over three hours that night.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Byron was on hand to explain the abbey's decision to install a wind turbine at the school three years ago and the financial benefits the school has enjoyed since.

But the rosy picture he painted, and whether it could translate to Block Island, was challenged by many transfer station neighbors in the Town Hall over three hours that night.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/23232</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Revised estimate of wind speed may kill Barrington turbine proposal</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/19273</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:50:19 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A proposal that the town build a $2.4-million wind turbine seems poised to topple due to a new consultant's report showing that wind speeds at the prospective site are not as strong as previously believed.

AWS Truewind, of Albany, N.Y., which initially gauged the average wind speed above Brickyard Pond at 13.4 mph, now says that the average speed per year is just under 12 mph.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A proposal that the town build a $2.4-million wind turbine seems poised to topple due to a new consultant's report showing that wind speeds at the prospective site are not as strong as previously believed.

AWS Truewind, of Albany, N.Y., which initially gauged the average wind speed above Brickyard Pond at 13.4 mph, now says that the average speed per year is just under 12 mph.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/19273</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind turbine bond language clarified in Barrington </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18475</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Official documents and a video recording of last May's Financial Town Meeting confirm that the bond vote regarding the proposed wind turbine project was to allow the construction on any town-owned property and not just at the high school. ...The wind turbine project has received some staunch opposition, including the recent circulation of an e-mail discussing the &quot;catastrophic failure&quot; of a wind turbine in Searsburg, Vt. The release, from the website www.windaction.org, was dated Oct. 16 and included photos. ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Official documents and a video recording of last May's Financial Town Meeting confirm that the bond vote regarding the proposed wind turbine project was to allow the construction on any town-owned property and not just at the high school. ...The wind turbine project has received some staunch opposition, including the recent circulation of an e-mail discussing the &quot;catastrophic failure&quot; of a wind turbine in Searsburg, Vt. The release, from the website www.windaction.org, was dated Oct. 16 and included photos.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18475</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Miller cites concerns on wind farm </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18194</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ State Senator Josh Miller is rasing concerns about the wind farm project announced by Governor Carcieri last week.

&quot;While the General Assembly has fully supported developing renewable energy projects in Rhode Island, I am concerned that Governor Carcieri has unilaterally moved Deepwater Wind to the front of the line when major questions remain about their experience and background. I am troubled by the lack of disclosure from Deepwater Wind's CEO about his financial relationship with First Wind,&quot; stated Senator Miller.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>State Senator Josh Miller is rasing concerns about the wind farm project announced by Governor Carcieri last week.

&quot;While the General Assembly has fully supported developing renewable energy projects in Rhode Island, I am concerned that Governor Carcieri has unilaterally moved Deepwater Wind to the front of the line when major questions remain about their experience and background. I am troubled by the lack of disclosure from Deepwater Wind's CEO about his financial relationship with First Wind,&quot; stated Senator Miller.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18194</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Councilor says turbine could tear town apart </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/18157</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Unanswered questions and legitimate objections - that's why Barrington Town Council member Jamie Schwartz believes the proposed wind turbine project would not get his vote of approval ... at least not right now.

Last week Mr. Schwartz went public with his position regarding the wind turbine. He said if he had to vote on the project tomorrow, he would vote no.

&quot;The disagreements over the economic model, the wind adequacy, the environmental impact, vendor qualifications, property values, construction impacts, aesthetics, etc., suggest that community buy-in is insufficient to approve the project,&quot; Mr. Schwartz wrote in a letter last week. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Unanswered questions and legitimate objections - that's why Barrington Town Council member Jamie Schwartz believes the proposed wind turbine project would not get his vote of approval ... at least not right now.

Last week Mr. Schwartz went public with his position regarding the wind turbine. He said if he had to vote on the project tomorrow, he would vote no.

&quot;The disagreements over the economic model, the wind adequacy, the environmental impact, vendor qualifications, property values, construction impacts, aesthetics, etc., suggest that community buy-in is insufficient to approve the project,&quot; Mr. Schwartz wrote in a letter last week. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/18157</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Residents angry with wind turbine site in Barrington </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17636</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Michael Khouri lives on Middle Highway. Like many of the residents at the Committee for Renewable Energy for Barrington (CREB) community meeting Wednesday night, Aug. 20, Mr. Khouri went to the event in search of answers.

Most of the two-and-a-half hour meeting, however, was spent in heated debate. 

The majority of the residents at the meeting at the American Legion Hall said they were concerned about the proximity of the wind turbine to their home if it is constructed at Legion Way, the noise it will generate, and its impact on wildlife in the area.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Michael Khouri lives on Middle Highway. Like many of the residents at the Committee for Renewable Energy for Barrington (CREB) community meeting Wednesday night, Aug. 20, Mr. Khouri went to the event in search of answers.

Most of the two-and-a-half hour meeting, however, was spent in heated debate. 

The majority of the residents at the meeting at the American Legion Hall said they were concerned about the proximity of the wind turbine to their home if it is constructed at Legion Way, the noise it will generate, and its impact on wildlife in the area.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17636</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Foes of Barrington wind turbine say it flouts zoning</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/17090</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Critics of a plan to build a wind turbine at the high school are adding zoning concerns to their list of objections to the project, which town officials say they want to relocated to a piece of town-owned land on Brickyard Pond at the end of Legion Way.

But the Town Council president counters that those concerns are groundless because the town is not bound by its own zoning bylaw. ...The town has until the end of the year to close a deal on the turbine if it wants to take advantage of a $2.1-million interest-free loan being offered by the IRS.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Critics of a plan to build a wind turbine at the high school are adding zoning concerns to their list of objections to the project, which town officials say they want to relocated to a piece of town-owned land on Brickyard Pond at the end of Legion Way.

But the Town Council president counters that those concerns are groundless because the town is not bound by its own zoning bylaw. ...The town has until the end of the year to close a deal on the turbine if it wants to take advantage of a $2.1-million interest-free loan being offered by the IRS.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/17090</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Barrington High School not ruled out as turbine site</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16859</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A dozen opponents of the high school site were at the meeting to ask the committee to immediately declare the high school off limits, and they presented a 21-page report that, they contended, proves that the turbine would pose a physical danger and noise hazard to students.

But committee members said they wanted to review the report and hear counter-arguments from the town's renewable energy committee, which has asserted that the device is safe. It has voted to give preference to the alternative site, which would be 1,000 feet from any house and have stronger winds.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A dozen opponents of the high school site were at the meeting to ask the committee to immediately declare the high school off limits, and they presented a 21-page report that, they contended, proves that the turbine would pose a physical danger and noise hazard to students.

But committee members said they wanted to review the report and hear counter-arguments from the town's renewable energy committee, which has asserted that the device is safe. It has voted to give preference to the alternative site, which would be 1,000 feet from any house and have stronger winds.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16859</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Barrington resident challenges zoning of wind turbine </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16531</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 05:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An abutter to Barrington High School believes the town may be violating a number of zoning ordinances with its siting of the proposed wind turbine. Kathleen Shafer, who lives at 210 Lincoln Ave., recently requested a zoning certificate regarding the wind turbine, which is slated to be built on the school's campus. The certificate would act to clarify the project with respect to any zoning implications of the proposed use. 
Barrington Building Official Robert Speaker replied to the request by stating that the high school property - and all other town-owned property - was exempt from town zoning ordinances.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>An abutter to Barrington High School believes the town may be violating a number of zoning ordinances with its siting of the proposed wind turbine. Kathleen Shafer, who lives at 210 Lincoln Ave., recently requested a zoning certificate regarding the wind turbine, which is slated to be built on the school's campus. The certificate would act to clarify the project with respect to any zoning implications of the proposed use. 
Barrington Building Official Robert Speaker replied to the request by stating that the high school property - and all other town-owned property - was exempt from town zoning ordinances.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16531</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Island wind turbine sites narrowed down to three</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16415</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Open space designations, deed restrictions and &quot;shadow flicker&quot; forced six of 10 properties off the list of considerations in the preliminary phase of the wind energy feasibility study. Site possibilities could change again if additional fatal flaws emerge, the Jamestown Wind Energy Committee determined at its June 10 meeting. ...The preliminary documents showed itemized limitations of the six sites eliminated from the list. Fox Hill Farm and Dutch Island were restricted as conservation areas set aside for wildlife habitat. Fort Wetherill, Battery Lane and the school grounds, all limited in space, threatened shadow flicker that would fall on populated areas. Watershed farms, as well as Fox Hill Farm had deeds that restricted development.  ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Open space designations, deed restrictions and &quot;shadow flicker&quot; forced six of 10 properties off the list of considerations in the preliminary phase of the wind energy feasibility study. Site possibilities could change again if additional fatal flaws emerge, the Jamestown Wind Energy Committee determined at its June 10 meeting. ...The preliminary documents showed itemized limitations of the six sites eliminated from the list. Fox Hill Farm and Dutch Island were restricted as conservation areas set aside for wildlife habitat. Fort Wetherill, Battery Lane and the school grounds, all limited in space, threatened shadow flicker that would fall on populated areas. Watershed farms, as well as Fox Hill Farm had deeds that restricted development. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16415</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Did town rush into turbine project? </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16201</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:04:06 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The vote over the proposed wind turbine in town has been cast, but that hasn't stopped one man from raising concerns over the project. While the majority of people attending last week's Financial Town Meeting voted in favor of a 264-foot wind turbine at Barrington High School, Ron Russo believes the project has too many problems for it to continue as proposed. 
He pointed to the overall height of the tower, its proximity to the high school's athletic fields and main building, some unclear information that could have confused voters, and said the project appeared to be fast-tracked by local town officials and the committee assigned to study the work. ...&quot;I feel like this was a rush to judgment. I think it's the wrong size and the wrong location.&quot; 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>The vote over the proposed wind turbine in town has been cast, but that hasn't stopped one man from raising concerns over the project. While the majority of people attending last week's Financial Town Meeting voted in favor of a 264-foot wind turbine at Barrington High School, Ron Russo believes the project has too many problems for it to continue as proposed. 
He pointed to the overall height of the tower, its proximity to the high school's athletic fields and main building, some unclear information that could have confused voters, and said the project appeared to be fast-tracked by local town officials and the committee assigned to study the work. ...&quot;I feel like this was a rush to judgment. I think it's the wrong size and the wrong location.&quot; 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16201</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>7 bid to build wind farm</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16115</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 02:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Seven developers, one as far away as Houston, have submitted proposals to build an offshore wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island.

Yesterday was the deadline for private developers to respond to the state's &quot;request for proposals&quot; that sought bids to finance, construct and operate a wind farm big enough to supply 15 percent of the state's electricity usage. ...It was unclear up until yesterday's deadline how many companies would make proposals, he said. There were 64 firms that registered their names with the state in order to download information about submitting a proposal, according to a list provided by Moynihan. The seven bids were not received until Thursday and yesterday.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Seven developers, one as far away as Houston, have submitted proposals to build an offshore wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island.

Yesterday was the deadline for private developers to respond to the state's &quot;request for proposals&quot; that sought bids to finance, construct and operate a wind farm big enough to supply 15 percent of the state's electricity usage. ...It was unclear up until yesterday's deadline how many companies would make proposals, he said. There were 64 firms that registered their names with the state in order to download information about submitting a proposal, according to a list provided by Moynihan. The seven bids were not received until Thursday and yesterday.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16115</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Turbine, budget approved by voters</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/16073</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In an overwhelming vote, but not without some passionate objection, residents at the Financial Town Meeting last night approved a plan to build a $2.4 million wind turbine, probably at the high school.

It took nearly an hour of debate for the proposal to pass, and the OK came only after the voters rejected an amendment that would have banned a windmill from the high school, but permit it anywhere else in town. ...
Nearly all of last night's debate was over the turbine, whose blade tips will sweep 328 feet into the air if it is built at the high school.

Supporters of the project have argued that the unit would save millions of dollars in energy costs over the 20-year life of the device.

Critics expressed their fears over safety and noise, saying there were better sites in town with more wind. ...&quot;I was really scared about what it would be like to sit on my deck and listen to the windmill,&quot; said Cynthia Thomsen, of 28 Upland Way. After visiting the turbine at Portsmouth Abbey, she said, she was still opposed to having it at the high school.

&quot;It is disturbing noise if it is 24 hours a day,&quot; she said. &quot;I believe my quality of life would be impacted in a negative way.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>In an overwhelming vote, but not without some passionate objection, residents at the Financial Town Meeting last night approved a plan to build a $2.4 million wind turbine, probably at the high school.

It took nearly an hour of debate for the proposal to pass, and the OK came only after the voters rejected an amendment that would have banned a windmill from the high school, but permit it anywhere else in town. ...
Nearly all of last night's debate was over the turbine, whose blade tips will sweep 328 feet into the air if it is built at the high school.

Supporters of the project have argued that the unit would save millions of dollars in energy costs over the 20-year life of the device.

Critics expressed their fears over safety and noise, saying there were better sites in town with more wind. ...&quot;I was really scared about what it would be like to sit on my deck and listen to the windmill,&quot; said Cynthia Thomsen, of 28 Upland Way. After visiting the turbine at Portsmouth Abbey, she said, she was still opposed to having it at the high school.

&quot;It is disturbing noise if it is 24 hours a day,&quot; she said. &quot;I believe my quality of life would be impacted in a negative way.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/16073</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Wind farm gathers steam</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15034</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wind farm developers, show us your plans.

That's the message Governor Carcieri sent yesterday to private developers who may be interested in building a massive offshore wind farm that would generate at least 15 percent of the electricity consumed throughout Rhode Island -- about 1.3 million megawatts of power a year.

At a State House news conference yesterday afternoon, Carcieri announced that the state has begun a formal request for proposals process, in which it seeks a partner in the private sector who would construct, finance and operate the wind farm.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Wind farm developers, show us your plans.

That's the message Governor Carcieri sent yesterday to private developers who may be interested in building a massive offshore wind farm that would generate at least 15 percent of the electricity consumed throughout Rhode Island -- about 1.3 million megawatts of power a year.

At a State House news conference yesterday afternoon, Carcieri announced that the state has begun a formal request for proposals process, in which it seeks a partner in the private sector who would construct, finance and operate the wind farm.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15034</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Carcieri proposes wind farm off Block Island </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/15041</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Such a project would require an estimated 105 wind turbines, making it about the size of the proposed Cape Wind project off Cape Cod. 

The proposal would meet Carcieri's goal of securing 15 percent of the state's energy needs through clean-energy sources. But questions remained after his 1 p.m. news conference about the cost of the project and its time-frame. ...The governor's plan appears at odds with a proposal by the staff of the R.I. Coastal Resources Management Council - the state agency charged with permitting projects in state waters - for a one-year moratorium on development proposals. 

 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Such a project would require an estimated 105 wind turbines, making it about the size of the proposed Cape Wind project off Cape Cod. 

The proposal would meet Carcieri's goal of securing 15 percent of the state's energy needs through clean-energy sources. But questions remained after his 1 p.m. news conference about the cost of the project and its time-frame. ...The governor's plan appears at odds with a proposal by the staff of the R.I. Coastal Resources Management Council - the state agency charged with permitting projects in state waters - for a one-year moratorium on development proposals. 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/15041</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Carcieri's energy goal a long way off</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14730</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ A New York-based investment firm that caught state officials off guard last fall with a proposal to build up to 338 wind turbines in Rhode Island waters now says it wants to pay for a meteorological tower needed to draft zoning regulations for development of a wind farm. 

The proposal was made public last week at a hearing during which R.I. Coastal Resources Management Council - the state agency that regulates Rhode Island's waters voted unanimously to put off a decision about placing a one-year moratorium on all offshore alternative energy projects, something the agency's staff proposed following the New York firm's surprise wind-farm application. ...Gov. Donald L. Carcieri's ambitious goal to produce a minimum of 15 percent of Rhode Island's energy needs through the development of wind-, wave- and solar-energy sources by 2011 is almost certainly not going to happen. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>A New York-based investment firm that caught state officials off guard last fall with a proposal to build up to 338 wind turbines in Rhode Island waters now says it wants to pay for a meteorological tower needed to draft zoning regulations for development of a wind farm. 

The proposal was made public last week at a hearing during which R.I. Coastal Resources Management Council - the state agency that regulates Rhode Island's waters voted unanimously to put off a decision about placing a one-year moratorium on all offshore alternative energy projects, something the agency's staff proposed following the New York firm's surprise wind-farm application. ...Gov. Donald L. Carcieri's ambitious goal to produce a minimum of 15 percent of Rhode Island's energy needs through the development of wind-, wave- and solar-energy sources by 2011 is almost certainly not going to happen. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14730</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Coastal seeks year-long wind farm moratorium; Effort to create rules and to map the ocean</title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14622</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In an effort to create ground rules as well as to determine what state waters would best serve potential wind farms, the Coastal Resources Management Council will vote next week on a proposed year-long moratorium on alternative energy projects in state waters.

The move would place a &quot;one-year moratorium on all renewable energy proposals in the state's territorial waters pending the development of an ocean special area management plan, or SAMP,&quot; reads the agency's notice on its website.

According to CRMC spokeswoman Laura Ricketson-Dwyer, coastal is acting because &quot;there is no specific section of our Redbook [regulation manual] that addresses wind farms.&quot;
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>In an effort to create ground rules as well as to determine what state waters would best serve potential wind farms, the Coastal Resources Management Council will vote next week on a proposed year-long moratorium on alternative energy projects in state waters.

The move would place a &quot;one-year moratorium on all renewable energy proposals in the state's territorial waters pending the development of an ocean special area management plan, or SAMP,&quot; reads the agency's notice on its website.

According to CRMC spokeswoman Laura Ricketson-Dwyer, coastal is acting because &quot;there is no specific section of our Redbook [regulation manual] that addresses wind farms.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14622</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Transmission limits hamper renewable energy plans </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14583</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ State and regional regulators acknowledge the hurdles - especially in northern New Hampshire - but don't have ready solutions. A bill before the New Hampshire Senate would have the state be ready to act if no regional solution is forthcoming.

ISO New England, which manages power for the region, is considering changing rules so more of the costs of transmission upgrades could be shared regionally. But as things stand now, backers of projects generally must pay for upgrades needed to connect them to the system.

&quot;None of this is a real speedy process,&quot; acknowledges Michael Harrington, senior regional policy adviser for the state Public Utilities Commission.
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>State and regional regulators acknowledge the hurdles - especially in northern New Hampshire - but don't have ready solutions. A bill before the New Hampshire Senate would have the state be ready to act if no regional solution is forthcoming.

ISO New England, which manages power for the region, is considering changing rules so more of the costs of transmission upgrades could be shared regionally. But as things stand now, backers of projects generally must pay for upgrades needed to connect them to the system.

&quot;None of this is a real speedy process,&quot; acknowledges Michael Harrington, senior regional policy adviser for the state Public Utilities Commission.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14583</guid>
</item>
            <item>
<title>Environmental groups oppose moratorium on offshore renewable-energy projects </title>
<link>http://www.windaction.org/articles/14531</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
<content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Two of Rhode Island's most active environmental groups have come out against a proposal by the staff of the R.I. Coastal Resources Management Council to put a one-year moratorium on applications from developers to build wind- and wave-energy projects in state waters. 

Grover Fugate, the CRMC's executive director, has said implementing a moratorium would enable the state agency responsible for regulating Rhode Island's waters and coastline to avoid the risk of costly, drawn-out political battles over wind farm proposals - similar to the decade-old effort by developer Cape Wind Associates to build a wind farm in Massachusetts' Nantucket Sound - while drafting zoning regulations for offshore energy projects here. 
 ]]></content:encoded>
<description>Two of Rhode Island's most active environmental groups have come out against a proposal by the staff of the R.I. Coastal Resources Management Council to put a one-year moratorium on applications from developers to build wind- and wave-energy projects in state waters. 

Grover Fugate, the CRMC's executive director, has said implementing a moratorium would enable the state agency responsible for regulating Rhode Island's waters and coastline to avoid the risk of costly, drawn-out political battles over wind farm proposals - similar to the decade-old effort by developer Cape Wind Associates to build a wind farm in Massachusetts' Nantucket Sound - while drafting zoning regulations for offshore energy projects here. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.windaction.org/articles/14531</guid>
</item>
   </channel>
</rss>
